scholarly journals Supportive Care: Comprehensive Conservative Care in End-Stage Kidney Disease

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1909-1914 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fliss E.M. Murtagh ◽  
Aine Burns ◽  
Olivier Moranne ◽  
Rachael L. Morton ◽  
Saraladevi Naicker
Author(s):  
Wouter R Verberne ◽  
Iris D van den Wittenboer ◽  
Carlijn G N Voorend ◽  
Alferso C Abrahams ◽  
Marjolijn van Buren ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Non-dialytic conservative care (CC) has been proposed as a viable alternative to maintenance dialysis for selected older patients to treat end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). This systematic review compares both treatment pathways on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and symptoms, which are major outcomes for patients and clinicians when deciding on preferred treatment. Methods We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) Plus and PsycINFO from inception to 1 October 2019 for studies comparing patient-reported HRQoL outcomes or symptoms between patients who chose either CC or dialysis for ESKD. Results Eleven observational cohort studies were identified comprising 1718 patients overall. There were no randomized controlled trials. Studies were susceptible to selection bias and confounding. In most studies, patients who chose CC were older and had more comorbidities and worse functional status than patients who chose dialysis. Results were broadly consistent across studies, despite considerable clinical and methodological heterogeneity. Patient-reported physical health outcomes and symptoms appeared to be worse in patients who chose CC compared with patients who chose dialysis but had not yet started, but similar compared with patients on dialysis. Mental health outcomes were similar between patients who chose CC or dialysis, including before and after dialysis start. In patients who chose dialysis, the burden of kidney disease and impact on daily life increased after dialysis start. Conclusions The available data, while heterogeneous, suggest that in selected older patients, CC has the potential to achieve similar HRQoL and symptoms compared with a dialysis pathway. High-quality prospective studies are needed to confirm these provisional findings.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. e86-e94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barnaby Hole ◽  
Brenda Hemmelgarn ◽  
Edwina Brown ◽  
Mark Brown ◽  
Mignon I. McCulloch ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenny Chen ◽  
Narelle Ilic ◽  
Holly Mitchell

Abstract Background and Aims Renal supportive care (RSC) is a novel multidisciplinary patient-centred model of care that focuses on symptom management and quality of life improvement in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), including conservative care. Despite an increased interest in embedding RSC into routine nephrology practice, there is limited literature on the effects of symptom improvement in patients attending RSC services. We aimed to examine symptom improvement and symptom progression in patients receiving renal supportive care. Method Using Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale Renal (IPOS-renal) scores collected during routine RSC clinics, we analysed the changes in individual IPOS-renal items and summative scores for symptoms associated with chronic kidney disease, stratified by time from the initial clinic visit (0-6 months, 6-12 months, and >12 months), in all patients attending our RSC service in a tertiary hospital between November 2015 and July 2019. Results Of 245 patients referred to our RSC service, 61 patients completed two or more IPOS-renal surveys. At initial visit, majority of the patients were reviewed at hospital outpatient clinic (n=42, 71%), followed by dialysis (n=8, 13%), home visit (n=6, 10%), and inpatient ward (n=4, 7%). The median (IQR) eGFR was 13 (7-16) ml/min/1.73m2 and median Karnofsky score was 70 (60-80). Weakness (n=59, 97%) and poor mobility (n=52, 85%) were the most common initial complaints. For all reported symptoms, dyspnea improved the most for all three time periods (summative IPOS score changes of 28, 17, and 8 points for 0-6, 6-12, >12 months, respectively). Poor mobility was the only symptom that continued to deteriorate between 0-6 months despite attending renal supportive care (without a physiotherapist). For asymptomatic patients, more than half of the symptoms remained quiescent after attending RSC service for more than 12 months. Among newly developed symptoms, nausea, dyspnea, and drowsiness were most common between 0-6 months. In contrast, pruritus, dry mouth, and constipation were the most common complaints after 12 months. Conclusion RSC interventions provided symptom improvement in patients with advanced CKD and ESKD, but poor mobility remained a concern in this population. Incorporating physiotherapy to RSC may further improve symptom management.


2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Wearne ◽  
Rene Krause ◽  
Bianca Davidson ◽  
Frank Brennan

In South Africa, there is a high burden of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). This is due to the burgeoning epidemics of communicable diseases like HIV/AIDS and non-communicable diseases, particularly hypertension and diabetes mellitus. One of the most difficult situations encountered by healthcare professionals dealing with patients with ESKD in South Africa is the management of a conservative or palliative care pathway for the many patients who have no other option. Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) have a high burden of physical and psychosocial symptoms, poor outcomes, and high costs of care. Many patients are managed in primary healthcare settings and either do not have access to palliative care or are not referred appropriately. Renal supportive and palliative care involves a multidisciplinary approach to managing patients with ESKD, to ensure that symptoms are managed optimally and to provide support during advanced disease. It aims to improve quality of life for patients and their families and must be provided alongside curative medical care. This support should include those unable to gain access to life-saving dialysis and it should also provide care for patients where dialysis is not the best option. The aim of this consensus statement is to assist healthcare providers to improve the management of symptoms and biosocial factors of patients with end-stage kidney disease in a South African context. The document was compiled through consensus building among healthcare professionals across South Africa. The professionals that are represented included nephrologists, palliative care physicians, social workers, nurses, paediatricians and hospital managers. We wish to acknowledge the contribution of Dr Frank Brennan, a leading expert in renal palliative and supportive care, who assisted greatly in the compilation of this document.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karan K. Shah ◽  
Fliss E. M. Murtagh ◽  
Kevin McGeechan ◽  
Susan M. Crail ◽  
Aine Burns ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
SrinivasVinayak Shenoy ◽  
Gayatri Palat ◽  
Lakshmitha Shetty ◽  
Sivakumar Vishnubhotla

2012 ◽  
Vol 184 (5) ◽  
pp. E277-E283 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. L. Morton ◽  
P. Snelling ◽  
A. C. Webster ◽  
J. Rose ◽  
R. Masterson ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document