scholarly journals A review of the validity of computerized neurocognitive assessment tools in mild traumatic brain injury assessment

Concussion ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. CNC31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacques P Arrieux ◽  
Wesley R Cole ◽  
Angelica P Ahrens
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Mild Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Neurocognitive Assessment ◽  
Injury Assessment

scholarly journals Prospective, Head-to-Head Study of Three Computerized Neurocognitive Assessment Tools Part 2: Utility for Assessment of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Emergency Department Patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 293-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay D. Nelson ◽  
Robyn E. Furger ◽  
Peter Gikas ◽  
E. Brooke Lerner ◽  
William B. Barr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Mild Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Trauma Center ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Post Injury ◽  
Neurocognitive Assessment ◽  
Level I

AbstractObjectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of three computerized neurocognitive assessment tools (CNTs; i.e., ANAM, DANA, and ImPACT) for assessing mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in patients recruited through a level I trauma center emergency department (ED). Methods: mTBI (n=94) and matched trauma control (n=80) subjects recruited from a level I trauma center emergency department completed symptom and neurocognitive assessments within 72 hr of injury and at 15 and 45 days post-injury. Concussion symptoms were also assessed via phone at 8 days post-injury. Results: CNTs did not differentiate between groups at any time point (e.g., M 72-hr Cohen’s d=−.16, .02, and .00 for ANAM, DANA, and ImPACT, respectively; negative values reflect greater impairment in the mTBI group). Roughly a quarter of stability coefficients were over .70 across measures and test–retest intervals in controls. In contrast, concussion symptom score differentiated mTBI vs. control groups acutely), with this effect size diminished over time (72-hr and day 8, 15, and 45 Cohen’s d=−.78, −.60, −.49, and −.35, respectively). Conclusions: The CNTs evaluated, developed and widely used to assess sport-related concussion, did not yield significant differences between patients with mTBI versus other injuries. Symptom scores better differentiated groups than CNTs, with effect sizes weaker than those reported in sport-related concussion studies. Nonspecific injury factors, and other characteristics common in ED settings, likely affect CNT performance across trauma patients as a whole and thereby diminish the validity of CNTs for assessing mTBI in this patient population. (JINS, 2017, 23, 293–303)

scholarly journals Utility of recently-developed questionnaires in mild traumatic brain injury assessment

1997 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 380-381
Author(s):  
C. Paniak ◽  
G. Toller-Lobe ◽  
J. Nagy ◽  
A. Stock ◽  
M. I. Goltz
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Mild Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Injury Assessment

scholarly journals Neurocognitive Assessment Tools for Military Personnel With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Scoping Literature Review

10.2196/26360 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e26360
Author(s):  
Chelsea Jones ◽  
Jessica Harasym ◽  
Antonio Miguel-Cruz ◽  
Shannon Chisholm ◽  
Lorraine Smith-MacDonald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Thematic Analysis ◽  
Military Personnel ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Neurocognitive Assessment ◽  
Military Populations ◽  
Neuropsychological Assessments

Background Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) occurs at a higher frequency among military personnel than among civilians. A common symptom of mTBIs is cognitive dysfunction. Health care professionals use neuropsychological assessments as part of a multidisciplinary and best practice approach for mTBI management. Such assessments support clinical diagnosis, symptom management, rehabilitation, and return-to-duty planning. Military health care organizations currently use computerized neurocognitive assessment tools (NCATs). NCATs and more traditional neuropsychological assessments present unique challenges in both clinical and military settings. Many research gaps remain regarding psychometric properties, usability, acceptance, feasibility, effectiveness, sensitivity, and utility of both types of assessments in military environments. Objective The aims of this study were to explore evidence regarding the use of NCATs among military personnel who have sustained mTBIs; evaluate the psychometric properties of the most commonly tested NCATs for this population; and synthesize the data to explore the range and extent of NCATs among this population, clinical recommendations for use, and knowledge gaps requiring future research. Methods Studies were identified using MEDLINE, Embase, American Psychological Association PsycINFO, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, Psych Article, Scopus, and Military & Government Collection. Data were analyzed using descriptive analysis, thematic analysis, and the Randolph Criteria. Narrative synthesis and the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guided the reporting of findings. The psychometric properties of NCATs were evaluated with specific criteria and summarized. Results Of the 104 papers, 33 met the inclusion criteria for this scoping review. Thematic analysis and NCAT psychometrics were reported and summarized. Conclusions When considering the psychometric properties of the most commonly used NCATs in military populations, these assessments have yet to demonstrate adequate validity, reliability, sensitivity, and clinical utility among military personnel with mTBIs. Additional research is needed to further validate NCATs within military populations, especially for those living outside of the United States and individuals experiencing other conditions known to adversely affect cognitive processing. Knowledge gaps remain, warranting further study of psychometric properties and the utility of baseline and normative testing for NCATs.

Feasibility of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Assessment Based on Cardiovascular Response to Postural Change

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. E422-E428
Author(s):  
Katie N. Russell ◽  
Edward A. Preble ◽  
Meghan Hegarty-Craver ◽  
Jacques P. Arrieux ◽  
Wesley R. Cole ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Mild Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Cardiovascular Response ◽  
Postural Change ◽  
Injury Assessment
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document