scholarly journals Psychiatry is warming up to personalized medicine 2.0

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 185-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Dirk Blom
2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 1077-1084 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Aarnoutse ◽  
J. M. P. G. M. de Vos-Geelen ◽  
J. Penders ◽  
E. G. Boerma ◽  
F. A. R. M. Warmerdam ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 63 (S 03) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Arndt ◽  
M. Beerens ◽  
H. Kramer ◽  
S. Klaassen ◽  
C. MacRae

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (09) ◽  
pp. 52-52

Die Digitalisierung und das Gesundheitswesen sind Partner, die es in Zukunft gemeinsam noch sehr weit bringen können – das ist die Botschaft des SAP Personalized Medicine Forum, das am 6. und 7. Juli in Bonn stattfand.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Giani ◽  
de Souza Patricia Borges ◽  
Stefania Bartoletti ◽  
Flavio Morselli ◽  
Andrea Conti ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. e8-e16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelica Tiotiu

Background: Severe asthma is a heterogeneous disease that consists of various phenotypes driven by different pathways. Associated with significant morbidity, an important negative impact on the quality of life of patients, and increased health care costs, severe asthma represents a challenge for the clinician. With the introduction of various antibodies that target type 2 inflammation (T2) pathways, severe asthma therapy is gradually moving to a personalized medicine approach. Objective: The purpose of this review was to emphasize the important role of personalized medicine in adult severe asthma management. Methods: An extensive research was conducted in medical literature data bases by applying terms such as “severe asthma” associated with “structured approach,” “comorbidities,” “biomarkers,” “phenotypes/endotypes,” and “biologic therapies.” Results: The management of severe asthma starts with a structured approach to confirm the diagnosis, assess the adherence to medications and identify confounding factors and comorbidities. The definition of phenotypes or endotypes (phenotypes defined by mechanisms and identified through biomarkers) is an important step toward the use of personalized medicine in asthma. Severe allergic and nonallergic eosinophilic asthma are two defined T2 phenotypes for which there are efficacious targeted biologic therapies currently available. Non-T2 phenotype remains to be characterized, and less efficient target therapy exists. Conclusion: Despite important progress in applying personalized medicine to severe asthma, especially in T2 inflammatory phenotypes, future research is needed to find valid biomarkers predictive for the response to available biologic therapies to develop more effective therapies in non-T2 phenotype.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document