Postoperative management of the surgical oncology patient

2018 ◽  
pp. 327-328
Author(s):  
Martin Kessler
1991 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 125-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mike K. Chen ◽  
Wiley W. Souba ◽  
Edward M. Copeland

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Olshinka ◽  
S. Mottard

Sarcoma treatment during the covid-19 pandemic is a new challenge. This patient population is often immunocom­promised and potentially more susceptible to viral complications.    Government guidelines highlight the need to minimize patient exposure to unnecessary hospital visits. However, those guidelines lack practical recommendations on ways to manage triage and diagnosis expressly for new cancer patients. Furthermore, there are no reports on the efficiency of the guidelines.    One of the main issues in treating musculoskeletal tumours is the complexity and variability of presentation. We offer a triage model, used in a quaternary-referral musculoskeletal oncology centre, that allows us to maintain an open pathway for referral of new patients while minimizing exposure risks. A multidisciplinary approach and analysis of existing investigations allow for a pre-clinic evaluation.    The model identifies 3 groups of patients: Patients with suspected high-grade malignancy, or benign cases with aggressive features, both in need of further evaluation in the clinic and prompt treatment Patients with low-grade malignancy, and benign cases whose treatment is not urgent, that are managed, during the pandemic by telemedicine, with reassurance and information about their illness Patients who can be managed by their local medical professionals    In comparison to a pre-pandemic period, that approach resulted in a higher ratio of malignant-to-benign con­ditions for new patients seen in the clinic (3:4 vs. 1:3 respectively), thus using available resources more efficiently and prioritizing patients with suspected high-grade malignancy.    We believe that this triage system could be applied in other surgical oncology fields during a pandemic.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6105-6105
Author(s):  
C. R. Friese ◽  
L. H. Aiken

6105 Background: Increased attention has focused on the role of hospital characteristics on cancer patient outcomes. We examined two cancer-specific credentials, as well registered nurse practice environments, on outcomes of care. Methods: Through secondary analysis of existing data from hospital claims, the tumor registry, and a statewide of survey of nurses (RNs), we studied 30-day mortality (D) and failure to rescue (death given a complication) (FTR) for surgical oncology patients treated in 164 Pennsylvania hospitals from 1998–1999 (N=24,618). We compared D and FTR rates by a hospital’s NCI cancer center designation, American College of Surgeon’s (ACoS) cancer program approval and categorized scores on the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index (PES-NWI). The PES-NWI scales measure RN participation in hospital affairs, RN foundations for quality of care, nurse manager leadership/support, staffing/resource adequacy, and RN-physician relations. Multivariate logistic regression models examined predictors of D and FTR, controlling for 25 patient variables. Standard errors were corrected for patient clustering in hospitals. Results: NCI centers had lower D and FTR rates (p < .01). ACoS hospitals had lower D and FTR rates (ns). Hospitals with low scores on PES-NWI scales had the poorest outcomes (p < .01). In logistic regression models, significant predictors included unfavorable PES-NWI Scores for D (OR=1.32, 95% CI: 1.06–1.65) and FTR (OR=1.39, 95% CI:1.03–1.88), and NCI centers for D (OR=0.64, 95% CI: 0.50–0.83) and FTR (OR=0.67, 95% CI: 0.47–0.96). The NCI effect lost significance when environment was included. ACoS program effects were small (OR= 0.99, p = .90) for both outcomes. Conclusions: Favorable outcomes in NCI centers may be partly explained by practice environments. The practice environment of RNs significantly predicts surgical oncology patient outcomes, and should be a focus of quality improvement activities. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2011 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 449-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinil K. Shah ◽  
Peter A. Walker ◽  
Stacey D. Moore-Olufemi ◽  
Alamelu Sundaresan ◽  
Anil D. Kulkarni ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chelsia Gillis ◽  
Leslee Hasil ◽  
Popi Kasvis ◽  
Neil Bibby ◽  
Sarah J. Davies ◽  
...  

The nutrition care process is a standardized and systematic method used by nutrition professionals to assess, diagnose, treat, and monitor patients. Using the nutrition care process model, we demonstrate how nutrition prehabilitation can be applied to the pre-surgical oncology patient.


2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (3.5) ◽  
pp. QIM19-145
Author(s):  
Cari Utendorf ◽  
Tiffany Stump ◽  
Sara Wolfe ◽  
Lynne Brophy ◽  
Jennie Gerardi ◽  
...  

Background: Research has consistently demonstrated the benefits of exercise in the oncology patient (Blaney et al, Psychooncology 2013; Garcia and Thomson, Nutr Clin Pract 2014; Rock et al, CA Cancer J Clin 2012). Despite the benefits of exercise for cancer survivors, only 20%–30% of them will be active after cancer treatment (Rock et al, CA Cancer J Clin 2012). The known barriers to exercise in oncology are lack of patient education, lack of knowledge, fatigue, decreased motivation, and comorbidities (Blaney et al, Psychooncology 2013). Objectives: This quality initiative program between oncology rehabilitation physical therapy department and surgical oncology nursing aims to improve the quality of care provided to our patients by reducing the barriers to exercise. One main barrier for the patients is their lack of knowledge of how to begin an exercise program. This is overcome by prescribing physical therapy and designing an individualized exercise program that can be performed in their home. Secondary objectives are to determine a change in fatigue, compliance, and/or any barriers after physical therapy. Methods: Patients are identified by the breast surgical oncology team, and a referral for physical therapy is placed. A comprehensive evaluation is completed, including: past exercise preferences, 2-minute walk test, a fatigue questionnaire, and a 30-second sit to stand test, with these same outcome measures obtained at discharge. The James Exercise Program is provided via 4 1-hour sessions. A nurse from surgical oncology calls the patient, administers the fatigue questionnaire, and determines any barriers to exercise that the patient is facing at the 8- and 12-week mark. Results: The preliminary results of the program demonstrate compliance with exercise, reduction in fatigue, improvement in endurance and strength. Conclusion: This innovative quality initiative between physical therapy and surgical oncology nursing has benefitted our patients. We leverage the expertise of the physical therapists to provide personalized exercise regimens and the professional clearance/recommendation for physical therapy from oncology team, to minimize barriers to exercise in the oncology population. Limitations to this program are that some participants fail to arrive at the initial session, lack of support and resources in the participants hometown to allow adherence to the exercise program (despite all efforts to encourage the fact that the program can be completed in their own home), and the low number of participants.


2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-34
Author(s):  
Serra TOPAL ◽  
Ayça SAYAN ◽  
Zeynep GÜMÜŞKANAT TABUR ◽  
Ömer YALKIN ◽  
Nidal İFLAZOĞLU ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document