scholarly journals Assessment of efficiency of open reduction and percutaneous fixation in treating options for calcaneal fractures

2022 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-90
Author(s):  
Dr. G Thanigaivelan ◽  
Dr. A Manikandarajan ◽  
Dr. Gurumoorthy M ◽  
Dr. Dhanpal Singh
Keyword(s):  
Open Reduction ◽  
Percutaneous Fixation ◽  
Calcaneal Fractures

scholarly journals Minimally invasive reduction and percutaneous fixation versus open reduction and internal fixation for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (7) ◽  
pp. 418-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haroon Majeed ◽  
James Barrie ◽  
Wendy Munro ◽  
Donald McBride
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Percutaneous Fixation ◽  
Calcaneal Fractures ◽  
Minimally Invasive Reduction

The aim of this article is to systematically identify and analyse research evidence available to compare the outcomes of minimally invasive reduction and percutaneous fixation (MIRPF) versus open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. Articles from 2000 to 2016 were searched through MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Library, Embase, ScienceDirect, Scopus and ISI Web of Knowledge using Boolean logic and text words. Of the 570 articles identified initially, nine were selected including three randomized controlled trials and six retrospective comparative studies. All nine studies had a total of 1031 patients with 1102 displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. Mean follow-up was 33 months. Of these, 602 (54.6%) were treated with MIRPF and 500 (45.4%) were treated with ORIF. Overall incidence of wound-related complications in patients treated with MIRPF was 4.3% (0% to 13%) compared with 21.2% (11.7% to 35%) in the ORIF group Functional outcomes were reported to be better in the minimally invasive group in all studies; however, the results did not reach statistical significance in some studies. All the studies had methodological flaws that put them at either ‘unclear’ or ‘high’ risk of bias for multiple domains. Overall quality of the available evidence is poor in support of either surgical technique due to small sample size, flaws in study designs and high risk of bias for various elements. Individual studies have reported minimally invasive techniques to be an effective alternative with lower risk of wound complications and better functional outcomes. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3:418-425. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170043

Could percutaneous fixation with crossed Schanz pins be an alternative to open reduction in the treatment of intra-articular calcaneal fractures?

2021 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 731-741
Author(s):  
Altuğ Duramaz ◽  
Ömer Polat ◽  
Mehmet Hakan İlter ◽  
Berhan Bayram ◽  
Alkan Bayrak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Open Reduction ◽  
Percutaneous Fixation ◽  
Calcaneal Fractures

Minimally invasive open reduction and percutaneous fixation of intra-articular calcaneal fractures

2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 272
Author(s):  
MohamedS Singer ◽  
Abdelsamie Halawa ◽  
HosamE Farag
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Percutaneous Fixation ◽  
Calcaneal Fractures

Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Intra-articular Calcaneal Fractures in Children

Orthopedics ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. e874-e879 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guang-rong Yu ◽  
Hong-mou Zhao ◽  
Yun-feng Yang ◽  
Jia-qian Zhou ◽  
Hai-feng Li
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Calcaneal Fractures ◽  
Fractures In Children
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document