scholarly journals Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for the treatment of optic nerve sheath meningiomas

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-125
Author(s):  
David W. Andrews

Radiosurgery has become an important treatment alternative to surgery for a variety of intracranial lesions. As currently practiced, it has in fact replaced surgery as a standard of care in some instances, compliments surgery as a post-operative adjunct in others, and most commonly represents an alternative to surgery or the only treatment option. Radiosurgery techniques have evolved quickly with the development of new technologies enabling more complex yet more efficient treatment plans. As a consequence, these technologies have broadened radiosurgery applications and improved radiosurgery outcomes. Among these newer techniques, treatments involving fractionated stereotactic radiation referred to as fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy, or FSR, have emerged as a consequence of linear accelerators designed for and dedicated to stereotactic techniques. Without the logistical constraints of retrofitted general purpose linear accelerators used in radiation oncology, often available only once or twice a week, dedicated units have enabled the design of treatment paradigms that strive for an ideal treatment based on the radiobiology of the target and dose-limiting contiguous tissues.This chapter will summarize our fifteen year experience with the Varian 600SR, initially with the Radionics software more recently modified to a Novalis shaped beam radiosurgery unit, and our practice of FSR for a variety of intracranial lesions. Special attention will be devoted to tumors involving or near the special sensory cranial nerves. Given the versatility of the Novalis treatment planning platform, one has the option of comparing different treatment planning solutions at once, including stereotactic intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). For selected skull base lesions, we have found that stereotactic IMRT yields greater conformality than FSR and we will therefore include its application among fractionation strategies. 

2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camilla Schalin-Jäntti ◽  

Pituitary adenomas characterised by excessive growth or hormonal overproduction despite surgical and medical interventions are a treatment challenge. This article discusses fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) as an adjuvant treatment for pituitary adenomas. Previously, management largely depended on conventional radiotherapy (RT). RT is effective but induces irradiation of surrounding healthy tissues, which has raised safety concerns. With the introduction of modern high-precision stereotactic techniques, irradiation of surrounding tissues can be avoided. The dose can be delivered in one (stereotactic radiosurgery) or several fractions (FSRT). While the use of radiosurgery is restricted to smaller tumours located away from the optic chiasm and nerves, there are no such restrictions for FSRT. FSRT provides an efficient and safe option for pituitary adenomas refractory to conventional treatments. The results seem to be at least as good as those achieved with RS but no direct comparison of these two techniques is yet available.


Neurosurgery ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 734-740 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy N. Showalter ◽  
Maria Werner-Wasik ◽  
Walter J. Curran ◽  
David P. Friedman ◽  
Xia Xu ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To review outcomes after fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSR) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for nonacoustic cranial nerve schwannomas. METHODS We reviewed medical records of 39 patients who received FSR or SRS for nonacoustic cranial nerve schwannomas at our institution during the period from 1996 to 2007. RESULTS Tumors involved Cranial Nerves V (n = 19), III (n = 2), VI (n = 3), VII (n = 5), IX (n = 2), X (n = 5), and XII (n = 2) and the cavernous sinus (n = 1). Irradiation was performed after partial resection, biopsy, or no previous surgery in 16, 2, and 21 patients, respectively. Twenty-four patients received FSR, delivered in 1.8- to 2.0-Gy fractions to a median dose of 50.4 Gy (range, 45.0–54.0 Gy). Fifteen patients received SRS to a median dose of 12.0 Gy (range, 12–15 Gy). Mild acute toxicity occurred in 23% of the patients. The 2-year actuarial tumor control rate after FSR and SRS was 95%. The median follow-up period was 24 months. Changes in cranial nerve deficits after stereotactic irradiation were analyzed for patients with follow-up periods greater than 12 months (n = 26); cranial nerve deficits improved in 50%, were stable in 46%, and worsened in 4% of the patients. No significant difference was observed for FSR compared with SRS with regard to local control or to improvement of cranial nerve-related symptoms (P = 0.17). CONCLUSION SRS and FSR are both well-tolerated treatments for nonacoustic cranial nerve schwannomas, providing excellent tumor control and a high likelihood of symptomatic improvement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document