scholarly journals On the complementary quantum capacity of the depolarizing channel

Quantum ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debbie Leung ◽  
John Watrous

The qubit depolarizing channel with noise parameter η transmits an input qubit perfectly with probability 1−η, and outputs the completely mixed state with probability η. We show that its complementary channel has positive quantum capacity for all η>0. Thus, we find that there exists a single parameter family of channels having the peculiar property of having positive quantum capacity even when the outputs of these channels approach a fixed state independent of the input. Comparisons with other related channels, and implications on the difficulty of studying the quantum capacity of the depolarizing channel are discussed.

2020 ◽  
Vol 125 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Fanizza ◽  
Farzad Kianvash ◽  
Vittorio Giovannetti

1989 ◽  
Vol 257 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
R G Duggleby ◽  
J C Nash

Current methods for fitting integrated rate equations to enzyme progress curves treat each observation as if it were an independent measurement. When the data are obtained by taking several successive readings from each of a series of progress curves, the data will not be truly independent and will exhibit autocorrelation. Here we propose a simple pragmatic extension of integrated rate equations which takes account of first-order autocorrelations. The value of the method is assessed when applied to five sets of experimental data.


2007 ◽  
Vol 05 (01n02) ◽  
pp. 119-124
Author(s):  
SIMONA SALVINI ◽  
STEFANO OLIVARES ◽  
MATTEO G. A. PARIS

We compare the sensitivity of Hilbert and Bures distances between two qubits in revealing small perturbations occurring to one of the qubits. We also analyze sensitivity in revealing perturbations to noise parameter of a depolarizing channel.


Author(s):  
Brian Street

This chapter discusses a case for single-parameter singular integral operators, where ρ‎ is the usual distance on ℝn. There, we obtain the most classical theory of singular integrals, which is useful for studying elliptic partial differential operators. The chapter defines singular integral operators in three equivalent ways. This trichotomy can be seen three times, in increasing generality: Theorems 1.1.23, 1.1.26, and 1.2.10. This trichotomy is developed even when the operators are not translation invariant (many authors discuss such ideas only for translation invariant, or nearly translation invariant operators). It also presents these ideas in a slightly different way than is usual, which helps to motivate later results and definitions.


Author(s):  
András Bárány
Keyword(s):  

This chapter models some of the results of the previous chapter. It builds on the recently developed notion of parameter hierarchies. Parameter hierarchies are sets of dependent parameters giving rise to chains of implicational relations among languages. The languages discussed in this book are positioned on a parameter hierarchy of ϕ‎-probes: some languages do not show any kind of agreement, others with a single ϕ‎-probe can agree with one argument, yet others with more than one probe with more arguments. It is argued that this hierarchy restricts agreement across languages in some ways, but that other parameters are needed to account for the full range of data studied in the book. This chapter concludes that there is no single parameter that governs differential object and differential subject marking.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document