scholarly journals A retificação do registro civil de pessoas transgênero na América do Sul em perspectiva comparada

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (39) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Luiza Moura

RESUMOEste artigo apresenta uma análise comparativa entre a legislação dos dez países da América do Sul integrantes do sistema interamericano de direitos humanos no que concerne à demanda de pessoas transgênero por retificação da menção de sexo no registro civil, a partir de uma perspectiva despatologizante. Após uma perspectiva geral da situação nos países mencionados, passa-se a uma análise crítica específica sobre o estado atual da questão no Brasil, tanto no que concerne às diretrizes legais no âmbito da saúde quanto no que se refere às normas de direito registral, apresentando, por fim, o projeto de lei brasileiro relativo à identidade de gênero, inspirado na legislação argentina sobre a matéria. PALAVRAS-CHAVETransexualidade. Direito Internacional dos Direitos Humanos. Direito comparado.ABSTRACTThis paper sought to analyze comparatively the legislation of the ten south American countries that are part of the Inter-American Human Rights System, regarding the civil registry rectification of transsexuals from a non-pathologizing perspective. After a general overview of the situation in the mentioned countries, a specific critical analysis is carried out on the current state of the issue in Brazil, in terms of legal guidelines in health and civil registration, presenting, in the end, the Brazilian bill on gender identity, inspired by the Argentine legislation, is presented. KEYWORDSTranssexuality. International Human Rights. Comparative Law.  

Author(s):  
Giovanni Farese

Chapter 8 provides a critical analysis of some of the difficulties experienced in attempting to promote the development of universal social and economic rights. It discusses the importance of ideology, human agency and power in the historical development of concepts of socio-economic rights in nation-states and then in international human rights mechanisms such as the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). It also discusses contemporary attempts by NGOs and other campaigning organisations to develop internationally agreed sustainable development goals (SDGs) and to promote the recognition and realisation of universal socio-economic rights globally.


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 331-347
Author(s):  
Caroline Adolphsen

Abstract The article provides a critical analysis of the new Danish Act on Use of Force in Somatic Treatment of Adults with a Permanently Impaired Ability to Give Consent (FTAC, Act no. 655 of 8 June 2017), which covers adults unable to give an informed consent. The rules in the Act are included in the legal framework governing medical treatment with and without consent in Denmark, and the article draws on international human rights in connection with the subject matter. The aim of the article is also to highlight the grey areas that still exist despite the new rules and to provide legal argumentation for solutions to the issues that can arise in these legal grey areas.


2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 122-145
Author(s):  
Malte Breiding Hansen

Since 2003, the United Nations international human rights framework has moved notably toward increased international human rights recognition for sexual and gender minorities. Most recently, 2016 saw the adoption of an Independent Expert on violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. Motivated by the nevertheless continued refusal by predominantly African and Middle Eastern countries to recognize any such human rights application, as well as postcolonial critiques of counterproductive moral imperialism and homonationalist strategies by proponent member States, this article asks how dynamics of member State disputes in the UN debates on SOGI-based rights may point to restraints and possibilities for achieving global human rights recognition for culturally diverse sexual and gender minorities. The article demonstrates how interand intradiscursive rules of formation in UN member State debates predicated on either universal or culturally relative readings of international human rights law reproduce normative polarization and obstruct national implementation of human rights protection for sexual and gender minorities. The article therefore finds universality truth claims to restrain transformative change, as well as represent a possibility for achieving human rights recognition through “perverse,” reiterations of the parameters of the universal, wielded from an open-ended multiplicity of sexual and gender minority expressions and articulations. A radical politics of top-down and bottom-up cultural translation is suggested as a possible strategy for human rights recognition for culturally diverse sexual and gender minorities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document