scholarly journals Improving genetic counseling access for parents of newborns who screen positive for cystic fibrosis: consensus guidelines

Author(s):  
Elinor Langfelder-Schwind ◽  
Karen Raraigh ◽  
Richard Parad

Introduction A risk associated with cystic fibrosis newborn screening (CFNBS) is parental misunderstanding of genetic information generated by the over 6,600 positive screens reported annually in the US. CFNBS algorithms incorporating DNA analysis can generate genetic information that requires clinical interpretation and has significance for the newborn, parents, and other relatives. Engagement between CF care centers and trained genetic counseling providers, such as licensed and/or certified genetic counselors (GCs), is variable and limited in providing information to CFNBS positive (CFNBS+) families. Methods Using a modified Delphi process, a workgroup of CF experts developed recommendations for engagement of genetic counseling services in CF care centers where CFNBS+ diagnostic evaluations are performed. Statements were assessed over three rounds of surveys, one face-to-face meeting, and through public feedback. Results Seventeen statements achieved >80% consensus (range: 82-100%). The workgroup affirmed prior CFF policy statements recommending genetic counseling for parents of infants with CFNBS+. The remaining statements addressed infrastructure and logistics of genetic counseling services, including defining appropriate training for genetic counseling providers and counseling content, establishing a path to equal access to genetic counseling providers across CF care centers, and setting a standard for client-centered CFNBS genetic counseling that is respectful of diverse patient needs and autonomy. Conclusions Implementation of client-centered genetic counseling for CFNBS+ families in CF care centers by providers with expertise in both CF and genetic counseling will require efforts to further define core concepts, enhance education of providers, and develop opportunities for access via telemedicine.

1980 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Passarge ◽  
F. Vogel ◽  
K. Berg ◽  
N. P. Bochkov ◽  
A. Czeizel ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Skinner ◽  
Colleen Guimond ◽  
Rachel Butler ◽  
Emily Dwosh ◽  
Anthony L. Traboulsee ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 976-983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allyson E. Somers ◽  
Stephanie M. Ware ◽  
Kathleen Collins ◽  
John L. Jefferies ◽  
Hua He ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 370-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajech Sharkia ◽  
Jalal Tarabeia ◽  
Abdelnaser Zalan ◽  
Esmael Atamany ◽  
Muhammad Athamna ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 996-1002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jubilee Brown ◽  
Aly Athens ◽  
David L. Tait ◽  
Erin K. Crane ◽  
Robert V. Higgins ◽  
...  

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to demonstrate the utility of a comprehensive program involving management-based evidence, telemedicine, and patient navigation to provide genetic counseling services for patients with ovarian and breast cancer across a geographically large health care system.MethodsWe identified all patients with newly diagnosed ovarian and breast cancer in our health care system from January 2013 to December 2015 through the cancer registry. Referral characteristics and testing outcomes were recorded for each year and compared using the χ2 or Fisher exact test.ResultsBecause the implementation of this program, the number of new ovarian cancer cases remained constant (109–112 cases/year) but patients referred for genetic counseling increased annually from 37% to 43% to 96% (P < 0.05). The percentage of ovarian cancer patients who underwent genetic testing increased annually from 24% to 27% to 53% (P < 0.05). The number of new breast cancer patients was constant (1543–1638 cases/year). The percentage of patients with triple negative breast cancer referred for genetic counseling rose from 69% in 2013 to 91% in 2015; the percentage of patients who underwent testing increased annually from 59% to 86% (P < 0.05). Of women with breast cancer diagnosed at less than 45 years of age, 78% to 85% were referred for genetic counseling across this period; the percentage of patients who underwent testing increased annually from 66% to 82% (P < 0.05). Patient navigation was initiated and was available to all patients in the system during this period. Telemedicine consults were performed in 118 breast/ovarian patients (6%) during this period.ConclusionsA comprehensive program may improve access to effective genetic counseling services in patients with ovarian and breast cancer despite geographic barriers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document