scholarly journals Posthysterectomy vault prolapse of vaginal walls: Choice of operating procedure

2012 ◽  
Vol 140 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 666-672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajka Argirovic
Keyword(s):  
Pelvic Floor ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Vaginal Vault ◽  
Clear Understanding ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Vault Prolapse ◽  
Ureteric Injury ◽  
Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy

Post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse is a common complication following different types of hysterectomy with a negative impact on the woman?s quality of life due to associated urinary, anorectal and sexual dysfunction. A clear understanding of the supporting mechanisms for the uterus and vagina is important in order to make the right choice of the corrective procedure and also to minimize the risk of posthysterectomy occurrence of vault prolapse. Preexisting pelvic floor defect prior to hysterectomy is the single most important risk factor for vault prolapse. Various surgical techniques have been advanced in hysterectomy to prevent vault prolapse. Vaginal vault repair can be carried out abdominally or vaginally. Sacrospinous fixation and abdominal sacrocolpopexy are the commonly performed procedures. The vaginal approach for vault prolapse is superior to the abdominal approach in terms of complication rates, blood loss, postoperative discomfort, length of hospital stay and costeffectiveness. Moreover, it allows the simultaneous repair of all coexistent pelvic floor defects, such as cystocele, enterocele and rectocele. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy is associated with a lower rate of recurrent vault prolapse and dyspareunia than the vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy. Other less commonly performed procedures include uterosacral ligament suspension and illeococcygeal fixation with a high risk of ureteric injury. Surgical mesh of non-absorbent material is gaining in popularity and preliminary data from vaginal mesh procedures is encouraging.

scholarly journals Vaginal Vault Prolapse

2009 ◽  
Vol 2009 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Azubuike Uzoma ◽  
K. A. Farag
Keyword(s):  
Negative Impact ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Aging Population ◽  
Vaginal Vault Prolapse ◽  
Vaginal Vault ◽  
Clear Understanding ◽  
Vault Prolapse ◽  
Ureteric Injury ◽  
Sacrospinous Fixation ◽  
Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy

Introduction. Vaginal vault prolapse is a common complication following vaginal hysterectomy with negative impact on women's quality of life due to associated urinary, anorectal and sexual dysfunction. A clear understanding of the supporting mechanism for the uterus and vagina is important in making the right choice of corrective procedure. Management should be individualised, taking into consideration the surgeon's experience, patients age, comorbidities, previous surgery and sex life.Result. Preexisting pelvic floor defect prior to hysterectomy is the single most important risk factor for vault prolapse. Various surgical techniques have been advanced at hysterectomy to prevent vault prolapse. Studies have shown the McCall's culdoplasty under direct visualisation to be superior. Vault prolapse repair rely on either the use of patient's tissue or synthetic materials and can be carried out abdominally or vaginally. Sacrospinous fixation and abdominal sacrocolpopexy are the commonly performed procedures, with literature in favour of abdominal sacrocolpopexy over sacrospinous fixation due to its reported higher success rate of about 90%. Other less commonly performed procedures include uterosacral ligament suspension and illiococcygeal fixation, both of which are equally effective, with the former having a high risk of ureteric injury. Colpoclesis will play a greater role in the future as the aging population increases. Mesh procedures are gaining in popularity, and preliminary data from vaginal mesh procedures is encouraging. Laparoscopic techniques require a high level of skill and experience. There are many controversies on the mechanism of prolapse and management techniques, which we have tried to address in this article.Conclusion. As the aging population increases, the incidence of prolapse will also rise, older techniques using native tissue will continue, while new techniques using the mesh needs to be studied further. The later may well be the way forward in future.

scholarly journals COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC AND ABDOMINAL SACROCOLPOPEXY FOR POST HYSTERECTOMY VAGINAL VAULT PROLAPSE REPAIR: META ANALYSIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 33-44
Author(s):  
Fariska Zata Amani ◽  
Azami Denas ◽  
Hari Paraton ◽  
Gatut Hardianto ◽  
Eighty Mardiyan K ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Vaginal Vault Prolapse ◽  
Vaginal Vault ◽  
Vault Prolapse ◽  
Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy ◽  
Significant Difference

Objective: Comparing the clinical outcomes of laparoscopic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy in vaginal vault prolapse post-hysterectomy’s patient. Method: Systematic search data is performed on medical database (PUBMED, Cochrane Database) using keyword:(1) vault prolapse [title] AND (2) laparoscopic[title] AND sacrocolpopexy[title]. Inclusion criteria:(1) randomized controlled trial and observational studies, (2) women with vaginal vault prolapse post hysterectomy, (3) intervention studied: laparoscopic (LSC) and abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC), (4) the entire fully accessible papers can be accessed and data can be accurately analyzed. Comparison about clinical outcomes of LSC and ASC was performed using narrative analysis and meta-analysis (RevMan). Results: Three studies compared clinical outcomes of LSC and ASC with a total of 243 samples (118 in LSC and 125 in ASC group). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between LSC and ASC (OR 1.10;95%CI 0.58-2.08). LSC was associated with less blood loss (MD 111.64 mL,95%CI-166.13 - -57.15 mL) and shorter length of hospital stay (MD -1.82 days;95%CI -2.52- -1.12 days) but requires a longer operating time (MD 22.82 minutes,95%CI 0.43-45.22 minutes). There was no statistically significant difference to anatomical outcomes (measurement of point C on POP-Q), subjective outcomes measured by PGI-I and reoperation numbers (repeat surgical interventions) for prolapse recurrence between LSC and ASC groups after one year of follow-up. Conclusions: LSC showed similar anatomic results compared to ASC with less blood loss and shorter length of hospital stay in management patient with vaginal vault prolapse.

scholarly journals Transvaginal Appendectomy: A Systematic Review

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet Ali Yagci ◽  
Cuneyt Kayaalp
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Studies ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Minimal Invasive ◽  
Morbidly Obese ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
History Of ◽  
Patient Selection Criteria

Background. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is a new approach that allows minimal invasive surgery through the mouth, anus, or vagina.Objective. To summarize the recent clinical appraisal, feasibility, complications, and limitations of transvaginal appendectomy for humans and outline the techniques.Data Sources. PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane, Google-Scholar, EBSCO, clinicaltrials.gov and congress abstracts, were searched.Study Selection. All related reports were included, irrespective of age, region, race, obesity, comorbidities or history of previous surgery. No restrictions were made in terms of language, country or journal.Main Outcome Measures. Patient selection criteria, surgical techniques, and results.Results. There were total 112 transvaginal appendectomies. All the selected patients had uncomplicated appendicitis and there were no morbidly obese patients. There was no standard surgical technique for transvaginal appendectomy. Mean operating time was 53.3 minutes (25–130 minutes). Conversion and complication rates were 3.6% and 8.2%, respectively. Mean length of hospital stay was 1.9 days.Limitations.There are a limited number of comparative studies and an absence of randomized studies.Conclusions. For now, nonmorbidly obese females with noncomplicated appendicitis can be a candidate for transvaginal appendectomy. It may decrease postoperative pain and enable the return to normal life and work off time. More comparative studies including subgroups are necessary.

scholarly journals Sacrocolpopexy in management of vaginal vault prolapse

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Javed Iqbal ◽  
Fauzia Nausheen ◽  
Fozia Ali Bhatti ◽  
Arif Tajammul Khan ◽  
Shahida Sheikh
Keyword(s):  
Operation Time ◽  
Abdominal Hysterectomy ◽  
Vaginal Vault Prolapse ◽  
Vaginal Vault ◽  
Vault Prolapse ◽  
Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
One Year ◽  
Study Setting

Aims & Objectives: To review the efficacy of Sacrocolpopexy in the management of vaginal vault prolapse Study Design: Interventional study. Setting & Population: Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Jinnah Hospital, Lahore. Women with vaginal vault prolapse after hysterectomy. Methods and Main-outcome measures: Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy using proline mesh. Follow-up in these patients were carried out at one week, four weeks, six months, and one year. Results: Sacrocolpopexy was carried out in ten patients for vaginal vault prolapse after vaginal (6) and abdominal hysterectomy (4). The mean age was 49.8 years. Parity was between P3 - P6 (Mean parity 4.3). Mean operation time was 79.3 minutes. Estimated blood loss was less than 200m1. No intra-operative or post-operative complications occurred in any case. Conclusion: Abdominal sacrocolpopexy is effective and safe in the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. This procedure has high success rate in correcting prolapse without a time dependent decrease in efficacy.

scholarly journals Impact of an acute Care Surgery Model on the Management of acute Appendicitis in South Korea: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gun-Hee Yi ◽  
Hak-Jae Lee ◽  
Seul Lee ◽  
Jong-Hee Yoon ◽  
Suk-Kyung Hong
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
South Korea ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Acute Care Surgery ◽  
Medical Procedure ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Care Surgery

Abstract Background The acute care surgery (ACS) system is a new model for the prompt management of diseases that require rapid treatment in patients with acute abdomen. This study compared the outcomes and characteristics of the ACS system and traditional on-call system (TROS) for acute appendicitis in South Korea. Methods This single-center, retrospective study included all patients (aged ≥18 years) who underwent surgery for acute appendicitis in 2016 and 2018. The TROS and ACS system were used for the 2016 and 2018 groups, respectively. We retrospectively obtained data on each patient from the electrical medical records. The independent samples t-test and Mann-Whitney U-test were used for continuous and non-normally distributed data, respectively.Results In total, 126 patients were included. The time taken to get from the emergency room admission to the operating room, operation times, and postoperative complication rates were similar between both groups. However, the length of the hospital stay was shorter in the ACS group than in the TROS group (4.3±3.2 days vs. 7.2±9.6 days, p=0.039).Conclusions Since the introduction of the ACS system, the length of hospital stay for surgical patients has decreased. This may be due to the application of an integrated medical procedure, such as a new clinical pathway, rather than differences in the surgical techniques.Trial registration: Retrospectively registered.

Surgical treatment of vaginal vault prolapse using different prosthetic mesh implants: a finite element analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 85 (5) ◽  
pp. 331-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aroj Bhattarai ◽  
Medisa Jabbari ◽  
Ralf Anding ◽  
Manfred Staat
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Pelvic Floor ◽  
Vaginal Vault Prolapse ◽  
Prosthetic Mesh ◽  
Vaginal Vault ◽  
Tissue Stiffness ◽  
Vault Prolapse ◽  
Vaginal Cuff ◽  
Female Pelvic Floor ◽  
Rectangular Mesh

Abstract Particularly multiparous elderly women may suffer from vaginal vault prolapse after hysterectomy due to weak support from lax apical ligaments. A decreased amount of estrogen and progesterone in older age is assumed to remodel the collagen thereby reducing tissue stiffness. Sacrocolpopexy is either performed as open or laparoscopic surgery using prosthetic mesh implants to substitute lax ligaments. Y-shaped mesh models (DynaMesh, Gynemesh, and Ultrapro) are implanted in a 3D female pelvic floor finite element model in the extraperitoneal space from the vaginal cuff to the first sacral (S1) bone below promontory. Numerical simulations are conducted during Valsalva maneuver with weakened tissues modeled by reduced tissue stiffness. Tissues are modeled as incompressible, isotropic hyperelastic materials whereas the meshes are modeled either as orthotropic linear elastic or as isotropic hyperlastic materials. The positions of the vaginal cuff and the bladder base are calculated from the pubococcygeal line for female pelvic floor at rest, for prolapse and after repair using the three meshes. Due to mesh mechanics and mesh pore deformation along the loaded direction, the DynaMesh with regular rectangular mesh pores is found to provide better mechanical support to the organs than the Gynemesh and the Ultrapro with irregular hexagonal mesh pores.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document