Chenopodium rubrum: Maiz-Tome, L.

Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
1996 ◽  
Vol 98 (3) ◽  
pp. 564-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivana Machackova ◽  
Josef Eder ◽  
Vaclav Motyka ◽  
Jan Hanus ◽  
Jan Krekule

2021 ◽  
pp. 153492
Author(s):  
David Gutiérrez-Larruscain ◽  
Oushadee A.J. Abeywardana ◽  
Manuela Krüger ◽  
Claudia Belz ◽  
Miloslav Juříček ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 392-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. M. Van der Sman ◽  
C. W. P. M. Blom ◽  
H. M. Van de Steeg

Reproductive development in three species from irregularly flooded areas of river forelands was studied in relation to time of emergence. In Chenopodium rubrum, flowering was induced earlier in plants germinated in April–May than in later cohorts. However, the period of vegetative growth diminished and the life cycle was completed in a shorter time in later germinated plants. Seed number was reduced, but seed size as well as reproductive effort per plant increased in later cohorts. Plants of both Rumex species flowered after a certain number of leaves had developed and before a critical photoperiod had passed. In earlier cohorts, the main shoot and several axillary shoots elongated and flowered. Fewer axillary shoots flowered closer to the critical photoperiod, and this resulted in a reduced seed output in later cohorts. The critical photoperiod as well as the time needed for completion of the life cycle was longer in Rumex palustris than in Rumex maritimus. It is argued that in the riparian habitat, plants of both Rumex species are only occasionally able to complete their life cycle in one growing season. Survival of these species on the population level will rely more upon adaptations towards flooding during the established phase than is the case for C. rubrum. Key words: flowering phenology, photoperiod, seed production, Chenopodium rubrum, Rumex maritimus, Rumex palustris.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document