scholarly journals The Maturation and Disintegration of the Hearsay Exception for Statements for Medical Examination in Child Sexual Abuse Cases

2002 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 47
Author(s):  
Robert P. Mosteller
2000 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin J. Gully ◽  
Karen Hansen ◽  
Helen Britton ◽  
Marcie Langley ◽  
Karma K. McBride

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 552-571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alyssa A. Rheingold ◽  
Tatiana M. Davidson ◽  
Heidi Resnick ◽  
Shannon Self-Brown ◽  
Carla Kmett Danielson

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 386-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alyssa A. Rheingold ◽  
Carla Kmett Danielson ◽  
Tatiana M. Davidson ◽  
Shannon Self-Brown ◽  
Heidi Resnick

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 381-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah Goldfarb ◽  
Gail S. Goodman ◽  
Rakel P. Larson ◽  
Mitchell L. Eisen ◽  
Jianjian Qin

Recent changes in statutes of limitations for crimes against children permit accusations of decades-old child sexual abuse to be considered in court. These laws challenge scientists to address the accuracy of long-term memory of genital contact. To examine theoretical, clinical, and legal concerns about long-term memory accuracy, children who in the 1990s (Time 1) were 3 to 17 years old and experienced a documented child maltreatment medical examination that included genital touch were interviewed between 2012 and 2014 (Time 2), as adults, about the medical experience. Almost half of the adults reported the childhood genital contact. Child sexual abuse and greater depression in adulthood predicted greater memory accuracy. No participant falsely reported chargeable offenses that did not occur, even when such offenses had been falsely suggested in a childhood interview. Some participants erred with regard to specific and misleading questions implying less egregious acts. Ramifications for theory and application are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document