Playing the Aesthetic Education Curriculum Game

1971 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 26
Author(s):  
David W. Ecker
1978 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 495
Author(s):  
Ralph A. Smith ◽  
Stanley S. Madeja ◽  
Sheila Onuska

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 83-90
Author(s):  
Zezhou Ye ◽  
◽  
Hui Xiang ◽  

The research defines the basic aesthetic qualities and divides them into three parts: aesthetic consciousness, common sense, and behavior. Empirical evidence from more than 1000 college students of ten universities showed that many students still lack basic aesthetic knowledge and skills, and there are also significant differences in gender, location, and qualification. Therefore, college students have a relatively large demand for aesthetic education curriculum, especially in the arts. But obviously, the current aesthetic education curriculums in colleges and universities cannot meet the needs of students, and it is even more difficult to guarantee the aesthetic ability of students who lack art education in primary and secondary schools. Therefore, it is necessary to make up for deficiency in university courses, and to carry out professional-based and even interdisciplinary and cross-border aesthetic courses can achieve the goals of aesthetic education in universities.


Author(s):  
Ben Hutchinson

Comparative literature is both central and marginal to literary studies: central because it draws on almost every discipline in the Humanities; marginal because it is not tied to any single tradition, risking being ignored by all of them. For all its past struggles and present debates, comparative literature has an increasingly central role to play in the Humanities’ future. ‘The futures of comparative literature’ explains that in this age of specialists, generalists continue to play a vital role in shaping and supporting the life of the mind. International, interdisciplinary forms of knowledge remain the very essence of modernity. Now more than ever, the aesthetic education of comparative literature is indispensable.


Author(s):  
Samantha Matherne ◽  
Nick Riggle

Abstract In his Letters on the Aesthetic Education of Man, Friedrich Schiller draws a striking connection between aesthetic value and individual and political freedom, claiming that, ‘it is only through beauty that man makes his way to freedom’. However, contemporary ways of thinking about freedom and aesthetic value make it difficult to see what the connection could be. Through a careful reconstruction of the Letters, we argue that Schiller’s theory of aesthetic value serves as the key to understanding not only his view of aesthetic engagement, but also his distinctive account of individual and political freedom. Whereas in Part I, we developed a reconstruction of Schiller's view that aesthetic value is the only path to individual freedom, in Part II we analyze how Schiller connects aesthetic value to political freedom. In the end, we show that Schiller defends a non-hedonic, action-oriented, communitarian theory of aesthetic value and a theory of freedom that makes the aesthetic not just supererogatory but fundamental for any fully autonomous life. Although we have lost touch with this way of thinking about aesthetic value and freedom, we submit that it is illuminating for contemporary thinking about both.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document