The Business of the Supreme Court of the United States. A Study in the Federal Judicial System. VIII. The Future of Supreme Court Litigation

1927 ◽  
Vol 40 (8) ◽  
pp. 1110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix Frankfurter ◽  
James M. Landis
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
The United States ◽  
Judicial System ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Future

The Federal Judicial Conference

1932 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 482-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norman J. Padelford
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Annual Meeting ◽  
Attorney General ◽  
Legal Profession ◽  
The United States ◽  
Judicial System ◽  
Annual Reports ◽  
Chief Justice ◽  
The Supreme Court

The Conference held its ninth annual meeting in Washington on October 1-3, 1931. Authorized by the Judiciary Act of September 14, 1922, the conference of the senior circuit judges with the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and the Attorney-General has become an established part of the judicial system of the United States. The reports of these conferences are to be found in the annual reports of the Attorney-General, beginning in 1924. The 1922 and 1923 reports may best be found in the Texas Law Review, Vol. II, pages 445 and 448, and in the Journal of the American Judicature Society, Vol. VIII, pages 85 and 92. In view of the general inaccessibility of the reports of the Attorney-General to the legal profession, it has been suggested that they be published in the Supreme Court Reports. The suggestion has not as yet, however, been adopted.

The Business of the Supreme Court of the United States. A Study in the Federal Judicial System

1925 ◽  
Vol 38 (8) ◽  
pp. 1005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix Frankfurter ◽  
James M. Landis
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
The United States ◽  
Judicial System ◽  
The Supreme Court

scholarly journals The supreme court of US as an authority of Constitutional jurisdiction

2021 ◽  
pp. 82-87
Author(s):  
A.S. Yarova ◽  
A.I. Sisova
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
United States Of America ◽  
The United States ◽  
The Body ◽  
Judicial System ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Creation ◽  
The Individual

Given the uniqueness of the judicial system in the United States of America and the role of the Supreme Court in shaping the country’s entire judicial system, the authors devoted an article to an analysis of the Supreme Court of the United States as the body that makes up the country’s Basic Law, the Constitution. Taking into account the specificity of one of the oldest written Constitutions of the world, it was appropriate to understand the mechanism of its creation, the powers of the body, which creates it also in the characteristics of this body, which the authors of the article have implemented. The authors analyzed a number of scientific works of both domestic and foreign scholars, the legal literature of the United States of America, the provisions of the Constitution, and fundamentally analyzed the legal system of the United States, and in this way the authors reached the correct conclusions. The history of the creation of the Supreme Court of the United States, its functions and powers were also analysed. The stages of the creation of the Constitution and the procedure for amending it were studied; the evolution of the interpretation of various provisions and of the amendments to the Constitution was studied; The role of the Court’s case law in the creation of the Constitution has been clarified; a number of constitutional precedents have been examined, particularly those that have influenced the interpretation of the V Amendment to the United States Constitution. The term «living Constitution» had been interpreted and explained, what the phenomenon was and what role the Supreme Court played. Sufficient attention has been paid to the individual thoughts and views of Supreme Court judges in the various periods of the institution’s existence. Special attention was also devoted to the analysis of the content of the concept of “constitutional control”, its interpretation in a broad and narrow sense. In the conclusions, the authors stress the principal aim of the founding parents, what meaning was given to the provi-sion of the Constitution, and note the impact of the Court on the State, the social system and the legal status of the individual. In particular, the authors note that the Supreme Court of the United States of America has established effective and acceptable jurisprudence for the Ukrainian judicial system, which has provided the basis for this study.

Conclusion: The Future of Abortion as a “Private Choice”

1989 ◽  
Vol 15 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 233-243
Author(s):  
Edward R. Grant
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Reproductive Health ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
The United States ◽  
Public Hospitals ◽  
Reproductive Health Services ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Future ◽  
State Employees

The immediate impact of Webster v. Reproductive Health Services on the majority of abortions performed in the United States will be marginal. Even if most states enact provisions similar to those approved in Webster, no abortions would be outlawed, and only abortions performed after viability or performed in public hospitals would be directly affected. At one point, Webster had the potential for breaking new constitutional ground on the extent to which states may restrict counseling for abortion in state facilities, and by state employees. However, due to Missouri's failure to appeal the invalidation of some of these provisions, and to the limiting construction given to the provisions that were appealed, these issues were not fully joined before the Supreme Court. Their resolution is postponed to another day.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document