Labor Law. Labor Management Relations Act. Employer May Fire Employee Refusing to Cross Another Union's Picket Line at Customer's Plant

Harvard Law Review ◽

10.2307/1336854 ◽

1952 ◽

Vol 66 (2) ◽

pp. 363

Keyword(s):

Labor Law ◽

Labor Management ◽

Picket Line

Labor Law. Labor Management Relations Act. "Object" of Picket Line Means Intended Results Rather Than Hopes of Union Members. Seafarers' Int'l Union v. NLRB (D. C. Cir. 1959)

Harvard Law Review ◽

10.2307/1338087 ◽

1960 ◽

Vol 73 (6) ◽

pp. 1232

Keyword(s):

Labor Law ◽

Labor Management ◽

Picket Line

Labor Law. Labor Management Relations Act. Federal Court Has No General Equity Jurisdiction over Administration of Union Welfare Funds. Moses v. Ammond (S. D. N. Y. 1958)

Harvard Law Review ◽

10.2307/1338310 ◽

1959 ◽

Vol 72 (4) ◽

pp. 778

Keyword(s):

Labor Law ◽

Federal Court ◽

Labor Management

Limitations Placed upon NLRB's Use of Dues Reimbursement Orders: Labor Law. Labor Management Relations. Brown-Olds Remedy

Stanford Law Review ◽

10.2307/1226889 ◽

1961 ◽

Vol 13 (2) ◽

pp. 401

Keyword(s):

Labor Law ◽

Labor Management

Labor Law: Labor-Management Relations Act: Constitutionality of the Emergency Strike Provisions

Michigan Law Review ◽

10.2307/1286022 ◽

1960 ◽

Vol 58 (4) ◽

pp. 595

Author(s):

James N. Adler

Keyword(s):

Labor Law ◽

Labor Management

A Study on the Revised Labor Law Analysis and Labor Management Plan for Korean SMEs to Enter the Cambodian Market

10.16980/jitc.17.2.202104.279 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 17 (2) ◽

pp. 279-300

Author(s):

Joon-Sang Cho

Keyword(s):

Labor Law ◽

Management Plan ◽

Labor Management

Employment Adjustments from the Perspective of Labor Law and Labor-Management Relations

Japanese Economic Studies ◽

10.2753/jes1097-203x080328 ◽

1980 ◽

Vol 8 (3) ◽

pp. 28-66

Author(s):

Yoshito Yamamoto

Keyword(s):

Labor Law ◽

Labor Management

Labor Law. Labor Management Relations Act. Section 301 (a) Gives Federal Courts Jurisdiction over Suit by Union for Enforcement of Award Made in Arbitration Pursuant to Collective-Bargaining Agreement. Textile Workers v. Cone Mills Corp. (4th Cir. 1959)

Harvard Law Review ◽

10.2307/1337992 ◽

1960 ◽

Vol 73 (7) ◽

pp. 1408

Keyword(s):

Collective Bargaining ◽

Labor Law ◽

Federal Courts ◽

Collective Bargaining Agreement ◽

Textile Workers ◽

Labor Management ◽

Made In ◽

Section 301

Labor Law. Labor Management Relations Act. When Union Struck One Member of Multiemployer Bargaining Association, Other Members Could Not without Economic Justification Lock out Employees

Harvard Law Review ◽

10.2307/1336908 ◽

1951 ◽

Vol 65 (2) ◽

pp. 353

Keyword(s):

Labor Law ◽

Labor Management ◽

Economic Justification

Bi-State Bargaining Unit Denied Union Shop Election in State with Anti-Union Shop Act: Labor Law. Labor-Management Relations Act, 1947. Section 14(b) Removes All Federal Restrictions upon State Legislation Prohibiting Compulsory Unionism

Stanford Law Review ◽

10.2307/1226166 ◽

1948 ◽

Vol 1 (1) ◽

pp. 151

Keyword(s):

Labor Law ◽

Bargaining Unit ◽

Labor Management ◽

State Legislation ◽

Union Shop

Labor Law: Employer Contributions to Joint Labor-Management Board Illegal under Taft-Hartley Act

California Law Review ◽

10.2307/3478384 ◽

1958 ◽

Vol 46 (3) ◽

pp. 480

Author(s):

Thomas A. Porter

Keyword(s):

Labor Law ◽

Labor Management ◽

Management Board