Latin-American Economic Development, Land Reform, and U.S. Aid with Special Reference to Guatemala

1962 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 351-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. Hildebrand

President Kennedy, in his inaugural address, spoke of an “Alliance for Progress” with Latin America and more recently of an expanded Latin-American aid program. His phrase “Alliance for Progress” underscores the fact that the U. S. chooses not to be identified with blind defenders of the status quo but to support evolutionary change calling for political, social, and economic reform.What motivates U. S. citizens to tax themselves to help the underdeveloped countries help themselves? One observes an interesting mixture of goals with respect to U. S. aid programs. There is no single enforced purpose handed down from higher authority. Each citizen indicates and advances his own preferences with some sort of compromise or majority view prevailing when necessary. One peculiarity of a democratic society is the pluralism of motivations and purposes.

1967 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raul Branco

The great concern with the economic and social development in Latin America has made the issue of land reform a very fashionable subject of discussion. The importance of land reform has been officially acknowledged in South America as well as in North America by the signing of the Charter of Punta del Este, which established as one of the objectives of the Alliance for Progress the ; change in land tenure patterns wherever necessary in Latin America. The widespread acknowledgment of the importance of land reform has not led, though, to general agreement on the consequences of land reform for the process of economic development in Latin America. It would thus seem appropriate to re-examine the effects of large landholdings on economic development.


10.3386/w3161 ◽  
1989 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eliana Cardoso ◽  
Albert Fishlow

1996 ◽  
Vol 38 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 159-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Glade

The production of inequality has been one of the most enduring features of Latin American economic and social systems, and one in which the institutional structure has perhaps exhibited the greatest consistency over time. In a very real sense, inequality is what the Mexican Revolution was all about, as was the Bolivian Revolution of the early 1950s. So, too, with the rise, in the middle decades of this century, of assorted populist political parties and movements. By the 1960s, participatory development had become almost a Zeitgeist, and distributional concerns had ostensibly come to suffuse many of the development programs launched during that first United Nations Development Decade, including the Alliance for Progress. It is relevant to recall that, quite early in the postwar flowering of development studies, Viner (1952) had suggested that the chief aim (and test) of development should be the reduction of mass poverty.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier A. Reyes ◽  
W. Charles Sawyer

1992 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. 207
Author(s):  
Abraham F. Lowenthal ◽  
Miguel Urrutia

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document