The Economics and Politics of Public Education. (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, Published November 1962 to February 1963. Each volume $1.75.) - Schoolmen and Politics: A Study of State Aid to Education in the Northeast. BY Stephen K. Bailey, Robert C. Wood, Richard T. Frost, and Paul E. Marsh. Pp. xv, 111. Volume 1. - Government and the Suburban School. By Roscoe C. Martin. Pp. x, 115. Volume 2. - National Politics and Federal Aid to Education. By Frank J. Munger and Richard F. FennoJr. Pp. ix, 193. Volume 3. - Issues in Federal Aid to Education. By Sidney C. Suprin. Pp. xiv, 64. Volume 4. - Cost and Quality in Public Education. By Harold F. Clark, Pp. ix, 54. Volume 5. - Federal Aid to Science Education: Two Programs. BY Paul E. Marsh and Ross F. Gortner. Pp. xiii, 97. Volume 6. - Administering the National Defense Education Act. By Sidney C. Sufrin. Pp. x, 76. Volume 8.

1963 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 979-980
Author(s):  
Robert J. Koblitz
2016 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 301-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brent D. Maher

The National Defense Education Act (NDEA) of 1958 was the first federal investment in low-interest student loans and became a precedent for expansion of student loans in the Higher Education Act of 1965. In its controversial loyalty provisions, the NDEA required loan recipients to affirm loyalty to the U.S. government. Between 1958 and 1962, thirty-two colleges and universities refused to participate or withdrew from the NDEA loan program, arguing that the loyalty provisions unfairly targeted students and violated principles of free inquiry. This essay argues that debate over the loyalty provisions fractured a partnership between progressives who favored general aid to education and conservatives who supported short-term investment for defense purposes. Although debates over the NDEA loyalty requirements seem specific to the Cold War, a close examination of the arguments illuminates their alignment with long-standing ideological conflicts over legitimacy of federal aid to higher education.


1965 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 172-173
Author(s):  
Morvin A. Wirtz

Two recent amendments to The National Defense Education Act of 1958 enlarged its scope to include the education of exceptional children. The new Title XI allows colleges and universities to plan institutes in critical subjects for teachers of exceptional children. The amended Title III provides for instructional materials to be used for all school children, including the exceptional. This paper briefly presents the Titles' provisions and indicates those who would be eligible.


PMLA ◽  
1965 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 29-32
Author(s):  
Donald D. Walsh

Our major activities this year, as in each of the past five years, have been undertaken either with foundation support or through contracts with the United States Office of Education under the National Defense Education Act. In February John Harmon became Director of the Materials Center, changing places with Glen Willbern, who became Director of Research. Under Mr. Willbern's direction and through a government contract we have just completed a survey of modern-foreign-language enrollments in junior and senior colleges as of the fall of 1963. We are currently negotiating several contracts through Title VI of the National Defense Education Act. The first is to gather statistics on offerings and enrollments in all foreign languages in public and non-public secondary schools. The second is to make a survey of current college enrollments in all foreign languages. Since gathering statistics on the classical languages is not a justifiable expenditure of national defense funds, the Modern Language Association will pay out of its own funds the proportion of the total cost needed to gather the facts on Latin and Greek in schools and colleges.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document