Juvenile Probation: An Analysis of the Case Records of 500 Children Studied at the Judge Baker Foundation Guidance Clinic and Placed on Probation in the Juvenile Court of Boston.

1936 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 1034
Author(s):  
Pauline V. Young ◽  
Belle Boone Beard
2001 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
RONALD J. SEYKO

On November 17, 1995, the governor of Pennsylvania signed into law Special Session Act 33 of 1995, which redefined the purpose of Pennsylvania's juvenile justice system to incorporate the principles of the Balanced Approach and Restorative Justice (BARJ) philosophy. This article describes the genesis of the new law, explains the BARJ model, and illustrates the effect that the law is having on the juvenile court system in Allegheny County. The article specifically focuses on the numerous projects that the Allegheny County juvenile probation department has instituted to meet the BARJ obligation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-87
Author(s):  
Gayle Rhineberger-Dunn ◽  
Kristin Y. Mack

The purpose of this article is to extend the existing literature on the workplace experiences of staff who work with juvenile offenders. We do this by assessing the extent of secondary trauma among a sample of juvenile detention officers and juvenile probation officers, and examine whether or not predictors of secondary trauma differ by position. Ordinary least squares (OLS) regression results based on a survey of 298 staff reveal that secondary trauma is relatively low among both juvenile detention officers and juvenile court/probation officers. Additionally, results indicate predictors of secondary trauma differ for each of these job positions. Experiencing threat or harm from offenders increased secondary trauma for detention officers but not for probation/court officers. However, having a higher level of education and input into decision-making decreased secondary trauma for probation/court officers, but not for detention officers. Greater support from coworkers led to decreased secondary trauma for both detention and probation/court officers. Implications for detention and probation agencies include efforts to improve supervisor and coworker support, as well as debriefing sessions after threat of harm incidents have occurred.


Author(s):  
Daniel Scott ◽  
Jennifer Boyer

In 2008, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania made national headlines when the “Kids for Cash Scandal” broke. As a result of the actions of the Juvenile Court Judge and other juvenile system personnel, the Interbranch Commission on Juvenile Justice was created to develop rules to prevent the juvenile jus-tice system in Pennsylvania from failing again. The purpose of this study was to determine how juvenile probation practices have changed since the scandal and if those departments were following through with the recommendations of the Commission. While many policies and practices have changed since the scandal, such as the policies regarding gifts and gratuities, there was a lack of consistency in the magnitude of those changes.


1970 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 172-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
William C. Brennan ◽  
Jefferson H. Ware

The Gault decision has resulted in the widespread use of at torneys in juvenile court. The purpose of this study was to ex amine the impact of this change on a group of thirty-two juvenile probation officers who had attended special institutes related to the lawyer's entrance into juvenile court. Their perceptions of counsel's role were conceptualized within the framework of (1) the nature of the attorney's participation in juvenile court, (2) the effects of the attorney's involvement, (3) perceived conflict between the lawyer and the juvenile officer, and (4) resolution of conflicts. Several attitudinal-type statements were included under each of these main areas to operationalize the juvenile officers' responses.


2001 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 573-609 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chad Trulson ◽  
Ruth Triplett ◽  
Clete Snell

In the past few years, several dramatic incidents have spurred renewed efforts to control violence and prevent crime in schools. Although it has yet to become a matter of much public discussion, what is particularly notable about many of these efforts is the increased collaboration of criminal and juvenile justice agencies with schools in their capacity as formal agents of control. In the present study, the authors evaluate one program that embodies this type of collaboration—Specialized Treatment and Rehabilitation (STAR). STAR is an innovative juvenile boot camp program in a public school setting that is operated through the combined efforts of the school, the juvenile court, and the juvenile probation department. Results of the evaluation revealed that although the program had a relatively small impact on recidivism, perceptions garnered from parents, teachers, and STAR participants were quite favorable for the program overall.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document