Milkweed Pollinia and Predation Risk to Flower-visiting Insects by the Crab Spider Misumena vatia

1989 ◽  
Vol 121 (1) ◽  
pp. 188
Author(s):  
Douglass H. Morse ◽  
Robert S. Fritz

2013 ◽  
Vol 67 (5) ◽  
pp. 785-794 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bianca Unglaub ◽  
Jasmin Ruch ◽  
Marie E. Herberstein ◽  
Jutta M. Schneider






2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 673-682
Author(s):  
Qichen Su ◽  
Lin Qi ◽  
Wei Zhang ◽  
Yueli Yun ◽  
Yao Zhao ◽  
...  

Abstract Many arthropods exhibit flower-visiting behavior, including a variety of spider species. However, as spiders are assumed to be strictly predatory, flower-visiting spiders are an often neglected group. We conducted a systematic biodiversity study of flower-visiting spiders based on published papers and field surveys. Most previous studies have focused on the herbivorous behavior of flower-visiting spiders (nectivory or pollinivory) and their effects on host flowers (tritrophic interactions with flower-visiting insects). In our field survey, we utilized standard transect walks (active sampling) and colored pan traps (passive sampling) to investigate species occurrence, diurnal and seasonal variation, and flower color preference of flower-visiting spiders. From the transect walks, crab spider species were found to be the dominant flower-visiting spiders and, based on all spider species, juvenile visitors were significantly more common than adults. Furthermore, in terms of spider number and species richness, tulips were the preferred flower to visit. For the pan traps, wolf spiders were found to be the dominant spider species. No significant differences were observed in the number of spiders caught in different colored pans, suggesting that color may not be an important flower trait in regard to spider preference. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to propose the term ‘flower-visiting spiders’ and conduct a systematic investigation of their diversity. However, this is preliminary research and further studies are required, especially as biodiversity is often closely linked to survey sites and ecotopes.



2011 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert R. Junker ◽  
Simon Bretscher ◽  
Stefan Dötterl ◽  
Nico Blüthgen




Ecology ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 172-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglass H. Morse ◽  
Robert S. Fritz


1994 ◽  
Vol 72 (9) ◽  
pp. 1583-1588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos F. Greco ◽  
Peter G. Kevan

Field-collected individuals of Misumena vatia and Phymata americana were compared experimentally as to the kind of vegetation and flower cues they use to choose a hunting site, by introducing them into choice arenas with variously manipulated natural stems of three species of plant and with artificial flowers. Misumena vatia showed a strong preference for stems with flowers or leaves or both; P. americana did not prefer normal stems as strongly and it did not show a statistically significant preference among the various manipulated patches. Both predators discriminated among Solidago canadensis, Daucus carota, and Cirsium arvense, showing a clear preference for the first. Misumena vatia showed a clear preference for yellow artificial flowers on wooden sticks when given a choice of four different colours. Phymata americana preferred yellow or blue to white or red, showing no discrimination between colours of the same group (yellow vs. blue or white vs. red). Misumena vatia took the longest time (ca. 43 min) to complete its choice of stem; female and male P. americana took 18 and 15 min, respectively. In all the experiments P. americana showed sexual diethism, the females being more choosy than the males. The ranking of discrimination from greatest to least was as follows: M. vatia, females of P. americana, and males of P. americana. We suggest that both species of predators have different strategies of patch choice and that in the case of P. americana, males and females have different patterns of patch selection, the males searching not only for prey but also for mates.





Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document