The Learning Process and Programmed Instruction

1963 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 102
Author(s):  
J. E. Richardson ◽  
Edward J. Green
1965 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 640-644
Author(s):  
James H. Zant

We shall make a basic assumption that we are interested in media which will be useful in the mainstream of instruction in the day-to-day mathematics classroom. For our purposes, new media are considered as materials which can be integrated with more conventional materials to provide a multimedia approach to the instructional-learning process in mathematics. Moreover, this discussion will be limited to communication media, which includes television, moving picture films, single concept films, projectuals, filmstrips, programmed instruction, and the like. That is, media to be used as a part of the instructional program will be that which communicates something about the concepts and principles of mathematics to the children in much the same way that the teacher or textbook communicates with them.


1968 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 162-164
Author(s):  
Sister Mary Joetta Sneider

With the continual developments in programed instruction, educators are responding in varied ways. Advocates assure that programmed instruction provides for the individual differences of students. Goldberg and his colleagues grant the advantages of programmed learning to be most evident with respect to the slower learner in helping him to obtain a direct familiarity with course materials.1 Fillmer finds that it guarantees personal attention to each student working with it.2 Clark claims, “A well-built program will allow a pupil to learn mathematics, to learn good mathematics, and to learn it with interest and understanding.”3 Heimer holds that there are three values to the student who is using programmed instruction: (1) He is continuously involved in the learning process, (2) he gains immediate reinforcement, and (3) he proceeds at his own rate.4


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document