Microbial Diversity and Ecosystem Function

Oikos ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bland J. Finlay ◽  
Stephen C. Maberly ◽  
J. Ian Cooper

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Willis

AbstractUnderstanding the drivers of microbial diversity is a fundamental question in microbial ecology. Extensive literature discusses different methods for describing microbial diversity and documenting its effects on ecosystem function. However, it is widely believed that diversity depends on the number of reads that are sequenced. I discuss a statistical perspective on diversity, framing the diversity of an environment as an unknown parameter, and discussing the bias and variance of plug-in and rarefied estimates. I argue that by failing to account for both bias and variance, we invalidate analysis of alpha diversity. I describe the state of the statistical literature for addressing these problems, and suggest that measurement error modeling can address issues with variance, but bias corrections need to be utilized as well. I encourage microbial ecologists to avoid motivating their investigations with alpha diversity analyses that do not use valid statistical methodology.



2011 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheree Yau ◽  
Ricardo Cavicchioli

Driven by advances in DNA sequencing technologies, an astounding amount of data is being generated from genetic material sourced directly from the environment, and this exponential growth of data is set to continue. By surmounting the challenges of working with such vast datasets, a whole new level of understanding is being gained about microbial diversity, microbial evolution and whole ecosystem function. For precious, pristine and logistically difficult to obtain Antarctic samples, metagenomic and metaproteomic approaches are providing the basis for fundamental new discoveries about how Antarctic systems function.



1994 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret M. Roper

Micro-organisms (bacteria, archaeas, fungi, protozoa, algae and viruses) occur in all environments and are interrelated with all other life forms. Micro-organisms are largely responsible for maintaining ecosystem function. They are extremely important in biological control mechanisms and in the transformations of food, energy and chemicals, including the mineralization of nutrients. Despite their importance, our understanding of the role and diversity of micro-organisms is very limited largely because of our inability to culture more than a few per cent of them. Molecular techniques being developed should result in the identification of many new micro-organisms. Notwithstanding our limited knowledge it is essential to evaluate the threats to microbial diversity and to attempt to minimize losses. Micro-organisms and microbial diversity risk being lost due to environmental causes such as pollution (by sewage, oil, organic compounds, pesticides and heavy metals), habitat loss (e.g. pH and salinity changes, and flooding), overexploitation (e.g., in agriculture, forestry and fisheries), species introductions and global changes. Micro-organisms that are particularly vulnerable to extinction, be it on a local or global scale, are those with a limited distribution, in specific habitats or those in habitats subject to widespread stress. Accompanying the loss of microbial diversity is the potential for losses of ecosystem function. A number of measures are needed to conserve microbial diversity. It is necessary to improve identification and measurement in terms of taxonomy, genetics and function. Ex situ collections are a means of securing micro-organisms for use and study by man. Where populations are poorly understood in situ conservation in protected habitats is the only option. Systems of indices and bioindicators need to be developed to monitor changes in microbial communities in such habitats. In order to co-ordinate conservation efforts it is essential to develop a global network of information. This can best be done through national and international policies being developed to conserve biological diversity.



1996 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 1226
Author(s):  
K. Newsham ◽  
D. Allsopp ◽  
R. R. Colwell ◽  
D. L. Hawksworth


Oikos ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 90 (2) ◽  
pp. 279-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. S. Griffiths ◽  
K. Ritz ◽  
R. D. Bardgett ◽  
R. Cook ◽  
S. Christensen ◽  
...  


2016 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne E. Bernhard ◽  
John J. Kelly


Ecology ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 77 (5) ◽  
pp. 1641
Author(s):  
David C. Coleman ◽  
D. Allsopp ◽  
R. R. Colwell ◽  
D. L. Hawksworth


2016 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne E. Bernhard ◽  
John J. Kelly


1996 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 321
Author(s):  
Ann Wood ◽  
D. Allsopp ◽  
R. R. Colwell ◽  
D. L. Hawksworth


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document