Immunochemical Quantitation of Thymine Glycol in Oxidized and X-Irradiated DNA

1989 ◽  
Vol 118 (2) ◽  
pp. 257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Hubbard ◽  
Haimei Huang ◽  
Michael F. Laspia ◽  
Hiroshi Ide ◽  
Bernard F. Erlanger ◽  
...  

1982 ◽  
Vol 257 (3) ◽  
pp. 1508-1515
Author(s):  
J.M. Wilson ◽  
P.E. Daddona ◽  
H.A. Simmonds ◽  
K.J. Van Acker ◽  
W.N. Kelley






2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Almaz Nigatu Tesfahun ◽  
Marina Alexeeva ◽  
Miglė Tomkuvienė ◽  
Aysha Arshad ◽  
Prashanna Guragain ◽  
...  

DNA polymerase III mis-insertion may, where not corrected by its 3′→ 5′ exonuclease or the mismatch repair (MMR) function, result in all possible non-cognate base pairs in DNA generating base substitutions. The most thermodynamically unstable base pair, the cytosine (C)⋅C mismatch, destabilizes adjacent base pairs, is resistant to correction by MMR in Escherichia coli, and its repair mechanism remains elusive. We present here in vitro evidence that C⋅C mismatch can be processed by base excision repair initiated by the E. coli formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase (Fpg) protein. The kcat for C⋅C is, however, 2.5 to 10 times lower than for its primary substrate 8-oxoguanine (oxo8G)⋅C, but approaches those for 5,6-dihydrothymine (dHT)⋅C and thymine glycol (Tg)⋅C. The KM values are all in the same range, which indicates efficient recognition of C⋅C mismatches in DNA. Fpg activity was also exhibited for the thymine (T)⋅T mismatch and for N4- and/or 5-methylated C opposite C or T, Fpg activity being enabled on a broad spectrum of DNA lesions and mismatches by the flexibility of the active site loop. We hypothesize that Fpg plays a role in resolving C⋅C in particular, but also other pyrimidine⋅pyrimidine mismatches, which increases survival at the cost of some mutagenesis.



DNA Repair ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 313-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica M. McTigue ◽  
Robert A. Rieger ◽  
Thomas A. Rosenquist ◽  
Charles R. Iden ◽  
Carlos R. de los Santos


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document