Hybridization of Free-Ranging White-Tailed and Mule Deer in Texas

1986 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 688 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzy S. Stubblefield ◽  
Robert J. Warren ◽  
Brian R. Murphy
Keyword(s):  
1996 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 326-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon K. Taylor ◽  
Victor G. Vieira ◽  
Elizabeth S. Williams ◽  
Rupert Pilkington ◽  
Sharon L. Fedorchak ◽  
...  

1989 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 347-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glenn D. DelGiudice ◽  
Paul R. Krausman ◽  
Elizabeth S. Bellantoni ◽  
Richard C. Etchberger ◽  
Ulysses S. Seal

2006 ◽  
Vol 84 (11) ◽  
pp. 1576-1583 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.W. Kuzyk ◽  
R.J. Hudson

Dry matter intake (DMI) of free-ranging mule deer ( Odocoileus hemionus (Rafinesque, 1817)) in the aspen parkland of east-central Alberta was estimated using the double n-alkane ratio and bite count methods. Eleven female mule deer were given an intraruminal capsule containing synthetic n-alkanes and released into 4–8 ha paddocks. Known concentration of even-chained carbon (C32) was released from the capsules and recovered 7–10 days later from freshly voided faeces. Odd carbon chains of adjacent length (C31:C33) were extracted from vegetation samples gathered during behavioural observations of four tame deer. Calculations from the pairings (C31:C32; C33:C32) provided estimates of DMI that ranged from 1.29 to 2.73 kg/day. DMI was highest during autumn, possibly to prepare for increased energy demands for the upcoming winter. No differences were found in seasonal or annual comparisons of bite rates, but bite sizes differed in all comparisons, suggesting bite size was a critical factor affecting consumption rates for mule deer on northern ranges. Maximum bite sizes rose from 49 ± 5 mg/bite in July to 213 ± 58 mg/bite in October. Maximum consumption rates were in October of both years (3.6–4.4 g/min) and occasionally approached theoretical maxima (14.3–15.6 g/min).


1997 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 381-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana L. Whipple ◽  
P. Ryan Clarke ◽  
Jerald L. Jarnagin ◽  
Janet B. Payeur

Mycobacterium bovis isolates from cattle, captive elk, and free-ranging mule deer and coyotes were examined by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis. DNA extracted from each isolate was digested with restriction endonucleases AluI and PvuII. DNA probes used for Southern hybridizations were a 37-base oligonucleotide and a 123-base–pair sequence specific for the insertion sequence IS 6110 and a plasmid, pTBN12, which contains a polymorphic GC-rich repetitive sequence present in several species of mycobacteria. Generally, M. bovis isolates originating from a single herd of either cattle or captive elk had identical RFLP patterns, whereas isolates from unrelated sources had distinct patterns. The RFLP patterns for M. bovis isolates from free-ranging mule deer and coyotes were identical to patterns observed for isolates from a captive elk herd that was located in the area where the free-ranging animals were found. These results indicate that the captive elk herd may have been the source of M. bovis that infected the free-ranging animals. Results of this study show that RFLP analysis is a useful tool for differentiation of M. bovis isolates and for molecular epidemiology studies to determine possible sources of infection in outbreaks of tuberculosis in animals.


1995 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 432-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack Rhyan ◽  
Keith Aune ◽  
Brian Hood ◽  
Ryan Clarke ◽  
Janet Payeur ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 125-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Woodrow L. Myers ◽  
William J. Foreyt ◽  
Patricia A. Talcott ◽  
James F. Evermann ◽  
Wan-Ying Chang

2005 ◽  
Vol 86 (8) ◽  
pp. 2127-2134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean E. Jewell ◽  
Mary M. Conner ◽  
Lisa L. Wolfe ◽  
Michael W. Miller ◽  
Elizabeth S. Williams

The prion protein (PrP) gene was characterized in 1482 free-ranging mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) from Wyoming and Colorado. Using DNA sequences from 363 deer, dimorphisms at codons 20 (aspartate/glycine) and 225 [serine (S)/phenylalanine (F)] were found; silent changes occurred at codons 131 (tyrosine) and 247 (isoleucine). The remaining samples were surveyed for codon 225 genotype and all were characterized for chronic wasting disease (CWD) infection status. A total of 112 deer with the genotype 225SF or FF were found, of which one was CWD-positive; 1370 were 225SS, with 289 positive for CWD. Among CWD-negative deer, the frequency of 225SF/FF genotypes was 9·3 % but among CWD-positive deer it was only 0·3 %. For all samples combined, CWD status was not independent of codon 225 genotype (P<0·0001). The odds that a deer of the 225SS genotype was CWD-infected were 30 times greater (95 % confidence intervals=4–213) than for a 225SF deer. The proportion of 225SF animals in sampled subpopulations varied from 0 to 18 %; the CWD prevalence varied from 0 to 25 %. However, no relationship was observed between genotype frequency and CWD prevalence in different areas. The PrP sequences of experimentally infected mule deer were analysed from pre-existing projects and 10 animals were found with 225SF genotypes, all of which were positive for CWD. Data available from some of these animals suggest that the 225SF genotype could be associated with longer incubation periods in CWD infection compared with the 225SS genotype.


PeerJ ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. e4968 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amélie Mathieu ◽  
Mark Flint ◽  
Patrick M. Stent ◽  
Helen M. Schwantje ◽  
Thomas E. Wittum

Background The provincial wildlife management agency, British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations and Rural Development, performed a translocation to control the urban mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus; uMD) overpopulation and supplement the declining non-urban mule deer (nuMD) population in the Kootenay region, British Columbia, Canada. The objectives of this cross-sectional study were to evaluate the health of the urban and nuMD populations by comparing pathogen exposure, body condition scores (BCS) and pregnancy rates, to characterize the health risks associated with the translocation and to investigate the role of infectious diseases in the decline of the nuMD deer population. Methods Two hundred free-ranging mule deer were captured in urban and non-urban environments in the Kootenay region from 2014 to 2017. BCS and morphometric examinations were performed for each deer. Blood samples collected from each deer were tested for exposure to selected pathogens and pregnancy status. Results Body condition scores averaged 3.4 on a five-point scale, was greater in nuMD, and significantly differed between years. Antibodies were detected for adenovirus hemorrhagic disease virus (38.4% (uMD 43.7%, nuMD 33.3%)), bluetongue virus (0.6% (uMD 1.2%, nuMD 0%)), bovine respiratory syncytial virus (8.4% (uMD 4.6%, nuMD 12.1%)), bovine viral diarrhea virus (1.1% (uMD 0%, nuMD 2.2%)), bovine parainfluenza-3 virus (27.0% (uMD 27.6%, nuMD 26.4%)), Neospora caninum (22.1% (uMD 24.4%, nuMD 19.7%)) and Toxoplasma gondii (8.2% (uMD 12.3%, nuMD 3.9%)). No antibodies against epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus were detected. Pregnancy rates did not differ between the two deer populations (90.7% (uMD 90.6%, nuMD 90.9%)). Exposure to N. caninum was associated with a reduced probability of being pregnant. uMD were more likely to be exposed to T. gondii than nuMD. Discussion Comparison of BCS, pregnancy rates and pathogen exposure of uMD and nuMD showed that the health of the two populations did not significantly differ, suggesting uMD translocations do not pose a severe risk of pathogen transmission between mule deer populations and that these selected pathogens do not factor in the decline of the nuMD population. However, inclusion of additional health indicators and creation of a robust predictive disease model are warranted to further characterize the health of mule deer and the health risks associated with uMD translocations. These results should be considered as part of a formal risk assessment for future uMD translocations in southeastern British Columbia.


2017 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 296-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amélie Mathieu ◽  
Nigel Caulkett ◽  
Patrick M. Stent ◽  
Helen M. Schwantje

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document