Osgood's Contributions to the Natural History of the Queen Charlotte Islands and the Cook Inlet Region of Alaska Natural History of the Queen Charlotte Islands, British Columbia. Natural History of the Cook Inlet Region, Alaska Wilfred H. Osgood

The Auk ◽  
1902 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 108-110

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 259-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. G. Sealy

From 1890 to 1899, the Reverend John Henry Keen collected plants and animals in the vicinity of the Anglican mission at Massett, on the north-central coast of the Queen Charlotte Islands (Haida Gwaii), British Columbia, Canada. Keen's prodigious collecting efforts resulted in the first detailed information on the natural history of that region, particularly of the beetle fauna. Keen also observed and collected mammals, depositing specimens in museums in Canada, England and the United States, for which a catalogue is given. Several mammal specimens provided the basis for new distributional records and nine new taxa, two of which were named for Keen. In 1897, Keen prepared an annotated list of ten taxa of land mammals of the Queen Charlotte Islands, including the first observations of natural history for some of the species. Particularly important were the insightful questions Keen raised about the evolution of mammals isolated on the Islands, especially why certain species, abundant on the mainland, were absent.



1901 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 1-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilfred H. Osgood


Polar Biology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (11) ◽  
pp. 1851-1871 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamara L. McGuire ◽  
Amber D. Stephens ◽  
John R. McClung ◽  
Christopher D. Garner ◽  
Kim E. W. Shelden ◽  
...  


Neurology ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 65 (12) ◽  
pp. 1919-1923 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Tremlett ◽  
D. Paty ◽  
V. Devonshire


1960 ◽  
Vol 92 (6) ◽  
pp. 401-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. T. Silver

The history of the black-headed budworm, Acleris variana (Fern.), in the western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla (Raf.) Sarg.) forests of coastal British Columbia is one of recurring cycles of outbreaks. The latest cycle occurred from 1952 to 1957 and was represented by three main outbreaks in the Portland Canal area from Prince Rupert to Stewart, the Queen Charlotte Islands, and on northern Vancouver Island. Previous to this, groups of West Coast outbreaks were recorded from 1940 to 1945, and from 1927 to 1931 (Prebble and Graham, 1945a).



1999 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 141-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert W Teasell ◽  
Harold Merskey

Two studies on whiplash-associated disorders that were generated by insurance companies were reviewed. The Quebec Task Force (QTF) report was comprised of a cohort study, a best evidence synthesis and consensus recommendations. The British Columbia Whiplash Initiative (BCWI) propagated the QTF recommendations.The Quebec Task Force Cohort Study:This study was designed to determine retrospectively the natural history of whiplash injuries, however, recovery from whiplash injuries was determined by the discontinuation of payments and not by the resolution of symptoms. Patients complaining of 'recurrences', who comprised a substantial percentage of the total number of patients studied, were specifically excluded from the data set. When these patients were included in the data set, the percentage of patients who failed to recover (based on whether they were still receiving compensation) had risen from the reported 2.9% to as high as 12.4% after one year. It is impossible to draw valid conclusions about the natural history of whiplash injuries from this study because it did not study recovery from whiplash symptoms and excluded the majority of patients who were classified as 'recurrences' from the final study analysis.The Quebec Task Force Best Evidence Synthesis Including Interventions:This analysis identified the paucity of conclusive research regarding treatments for whiplash. The paucity of conclusive research limited the number of conclusions that could be drawn.The Quebec Task Force Consensus Recommendations:Despite a recognized lack of quality research, a consensus report that focused on therapeutic interventions was made. This consensus report is of concern because there was limited evidence to support the consensus, the classifications and recommendations were entirely arbitrary, the cohort data that the consensus panel relied upon to identify a natural history was seriously flawed, funding for the study was partisan, there was potential for abuse of guidelines, and there was a failure to deal with chronic whiplash injuries.The British Columbia Whiplash Initiative:This report, which was designed as a set of educational modules, relied heavily on the QTF, particularly the cohort study and the consensus recommendations. As a result, the report was based upon a flawed and overly optimistic picture of the natural history of whiplash disorders, and an arbitrary classification and management system. Both the QTF and the BCWI draw attention to the potential dangers of insurance industry initiatives designed to persuade medical and allied health professionals to accept viewpoints that appear overoptimistic and potentially self-serving.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document