The Origin of Long-Term Cohort Differences in the Distribution of Greater Flamingos Phoenicopterus ruber roseus in Winter

10.2307/4847 ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 543 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. E. Green ◽  
G. J. M. Hirons ◽  
A. R. Johnson
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K. B. Seglem ◽  
R. Ørstavik ◽  
F. A. Torvik ◽  
E. Røysamb ◽  
M. Vollrath

Abstract Background Long-term sickness absences burden the economy in many industrialized countries. Both educational attainment and health behaviors are well-known predictors of sickness absence. It remains, however, unclear whether these associations are causal or due to confounding factors. The co-twin control method allows examining causal hypotheses by controlling for familial confounding (shared genes and environment). In this study, we applied this design to study the role of education and health behaviors in sickness absence, taking sex and cohort differences into account. Methods Participants were two cohorts of in total 8806 Norwegian twins born 1948 to 1960 (older cohort, mean age at questionnaire = 40.3, 55.8% women), and 1967 to 1979 (younger cohort, mean age at questionnaire = 25.6, 58.9% women). Both cohorts had reported their health behaviors (smoking, physical activity and body mass index (BMI)) through a questionnaire during the 1990s. Data on the twins’ educational attainment and long-term sickness absences between 2000 and 2014 were retrieved from Norwegian national registries. Random (individual-level) and fixed (within-twin pair) effects regression models were used to measure the associations between educational attainment, health behaviours and sickness absence and to test the effects of possible familial confounding. Results Low education and poor health behaviors were associated with a higher proportion of sickness absence at the individual level. There were stronger effects of health behaviors on sickness absence in women, and in the older cohort, whereas the effect of educational attainment was similar across sex and cohorts. After adjustment for unobserved familial factors (genetic and environmental factors shared by twin pairs), the associations were strongly attenuated and non-significant, with the exception of health behaviors and sickness absence among men in the older cohort. Conclusions The associations between educational attainment, health behaviors, and sickness absence seem to be confounded by unobserved familial factors shared by co-twins. However, the association between health behaviors and sickness absence was consistent with a causal effect among men in the older cohort. Future studies should consider familial confounding, as well as sex and age/cohort differences, when assessing associations between education, health behaviors and sickness absence.


2006 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 261-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. BATTY ◽  
N. S. JARRETT ◽  
N. FORBES ◽  
M. J. BROWN ◽  
S. STANDLEY ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Hammarström ◽  
Pekka Virtanen

Background and aim: Referring to the ecosocial theory and utilising the ‘natural experiment’ setting provided by the global recession at the beginning of 1990s, the aim of our study was to analyse the short- and long-term associations between trade and mental health in young students followed until mid-adulthood. Method: The study was based on two prospective cohort studies, the older and the younger Northern Swedish Cohort which both consisted of all pupils in a middle-sized industrial town in Northern Sweden. At age 21, the younger cohort entered the labour market during the deep recession of the early 1990s, while the older cohort entered the labour market during the boom of the 1980s. Both cohorts were followed up with a high response rate in mid adulthood. For this study, all students were selected at age 21. Results: At age 21, those who studied during recession had more depressive and functional somatic symptoms than those who studied during boom. The cohort differences did not remain over age: by the follow-up in early middle age the differences between the cohorts were non-significant, most notably due to decreased depressive symptoms in the younger cohort and increase of functional somatic symptoms in the older cohort. Conclusions: The short-term mental health consequences of the business cycle seem to be more extensive than limited only to those who are unemployed, even though the possible long-term consequences seem to be more complex. Thus, the macrolevel had a great short-term impact on the individual level in relation to the microlevel setting of university/school. The chronosystem was also of major importance. Future research would benefit from taking the context into account.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 942-942
Author(s):  
Felicia Wheaton ◽  
Matilda Johnson ◽  
Thometta Cozart

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic has caused major disruption to society, including education, the economy, daily life, etc. To understand the impact of the pandemic on both short-term and anticipated long-term mental and physical health, as well as potential period and cohort differences, surveys were emailed to all students, faculty and staff at a Florida HBCU. The survey included the GAD-7 anxiety scale, PHQ-9 scale of depression severity and the UCLA Revised Loneliness Scale (3rd revision), as well as questions about the pandemic’s impact on physical and mental wellbeing in the month of April and long-term physical and mental health. Although loneliness did not differ among groups, students reported the highest levels of moderate/severe depression (46.6%), followed by faculty (21.1%) and staff (6.9%). Students also reported the highest levels of moderate/severe anxiety (48.6%) compared with faculty (29.4%) and staff (12.1%). Students were more likely to say the pandemic moderately or very much impacted their overall physical and mental wellbeing in April. However, faculty were more likely to report that their long-term physical and mental health would be somewhat/greatly affected, followed by students, and then staff. Staff reported the highest levels of optimism about the future, followed by students and faculty. Taken together, these findings indicate substantial differences in the perceived impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.


1997 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Mateo ◽  
Joan Carles Dolz ◽  
José M. Aguilar Serrano ◽  
Josabel Belliure ◽  
Ralmon Guitart

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document