State infrastructure policy and planning

2017 ◽  
pp. 125-142
2019 ◽  
pp. 144-148
Author(s):  
H. Yu. Zubko

The article forms a scientific argument regarding the allocation of a particular type of infrastructure – space infrastructure. The justification about the need to develop relevant directions of the state infrastructure policy is presented. The foreign experience of forming a state policy on the protection of space infrastructural facilities is analysed. The organic connection between the effective protection of space infrastructure and the functioning of the infrastructure system in the other four spaces is proved. The militarization of space infrastructure is argued. Proposals on improving the legislation of Ukraine regulating relations in the field of infrastructure are made. The need to create infrastructure legislation is demonstrated. The necessity of consolidation of such kind of infrastructure as space infrastructure at the level of legislation is substantiated. Threats to the national security of Ukraine in the area of critical infrastructure are identified. It is emphasized that the efficient functioning of space infrastructure will be a guarantee of the effectiveness of the infrastructure system in general in all dimensions: land, air, water, cyberspace, and space. The conclusion is substantiated that Ukraine should develop space infrastructure, launch its satellites into orbit, and create a powerful space infrastructure. Noted that in order to achieve the set goal and tasks, it is necessary to develop appropriate directions of the state policy in this field and adequate directions of their administrative and legal support.


Land ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 133
Author(s):  
Raghu Dharmapuri Tirumala ◽  
Piyush Tiwari

A rapid increase in land and property values has been one of the driving forces of urban ecosystem development in many countries. This phenomenon has presented project proponents/policymakers with multiple options and associated challenges, nudging them to configure or incorporate elements of land-based financing in their policies and legislations. Specifically, the Government of India and various state governments have sought to monetize land through diverse instruments, for augmenting the financial viability of infrastructure and area development projects. This paper compares Indian central and state infrastructure policies/acts with regard to land monetization strategies. The analysis indicates that policies and legislations are taking a turn towards promoting land monetization mechanisms as a financing tool for cities and project implementation agencies. However, the approach is cautiously used and implementation is often seen to fall behind actual project timelines. Based on the findings, key determinants of a successful policy that captures an increase in land values, are identified. The learnings provide useful inputs for states to strengthen their policy documents and legislative/institutional frameworks, for ensuring the effectiveness of land-based financing tools.


1997 ◽  
Vol 52 (8) ◽  
pp. 869-872
Author(s):  
No authorship indicated

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document