Minimally Invasive Esophageal Procedures

Gastroesophageal Reflux ◽

Minimally Invasive ◽

Reflux Disease ◽

Paraesophageal Hernia ◽

Nissen Fundoplication ◽

Outcome Evaluation ◽

Barrett Esophagus ◽

Asymptomatic Patients

In most instances, laparoscopy has replaced open procedures as the standard of care. Nevertheless, equipoise remains in the literature regarding the benefits of surgery compared with alternative treatment strategies such as medications in the case of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or endoscopic procedures in the case of achalasia. According to Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) guidelines published in 2010, indications for surgery include (1) failure of medical management, (2) patient preference, (3) complications of GERD (Barrett esophagus, peptic stricture), and (4) extraesophageal manifestations (asthma, hoarseness, cough, chest pain, aspiration). This chapter is organized by surgical procedure, all of which are derivatives of the laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. In this chapter, the authors focus on minimally invasive surgical approaches to the treatment of the following benign esophageal disorders: GERD, achalasia, and paraesophageal hernias. New in this chapter is the in-depth coverage of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. The majority of patients with paraesophageal hernias are asymptomatic, and their hernias are found incidentally with a retrocardiac gastric bubble on an upright chest x-ray or herniated gastroesophageal junction seen on a chest or abdominal computed tomographic scan. For patients who are symptomatic, surgical repair is indicated as there is no medical treatment for this mechanical problem. For asymptomatic patients, clinical judgment needs to be used. All surgical procedures are covered by preoperative evaluation, operative planning, and operative technique, with a troubleshooting note for every step. Procedure complications, postoperative care, and outcome evaluation follow each procedure, listing the most current reports and data. This review contains 10 figures, 9 tables and 49 references Keywords: Minimally invasive surgery, esophagectomy, myotomy, gastroesophageal reflux disease, Barrett esophagus, Nissen fundoplication, fundoplication, paraesophageal hernia

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Hiatal Hernia

10.2310/tywc.2046 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Kyle A. Perry ◽

Vivian L. Wang

Keyword(s):

Gastroesophageal Reflux ◽

Hiatal Hernia ◽

Barrett’S Esophagus ◽

Reflux Disease ◽

Barrett's Esophagus ◽

Paraesophageal Hernia ◽

Nissen Fundoplication ◽

Symptomatic Gerd

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is common, affecting approximately 18 to 27% of adult Americans, and can have a considerable impact on quality of life. Hiatal hernias are present in 80% of patients with symptomatic GERD. This review covers the basic pathophysiology, evaluation, and treatment algorithms for patients with GERD and hiatal hernia. Figures show normal gastroesophageal junction anatomy, treatment algorithm for patients with symptomatic GERD, schematic and endoscopic images of long segment Barrett's esophagus, a normal barium esophagogram, esophageal intraluminal pressures assessed by esophageal manometry, test results from a 48-hour wireless pH study, laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication, laparoscopic gastroesophageal junction reinforcement, classification of paraesophageal hernia, and endoscopic view of Cameron ulcers at the level of the diaphragm in the setting of a type III paraesophageal hernia. Tables list risk factors for GERD and a standardized approach to Nissen fundoplication. This review contains 10 figures, 3 tables, and 68 references. Keywords: Gastroesophageal reflux disease, GERD, hiatal hernia, paraesophageal hernia, anti-reflux surgery, Nissen fundoplication, Barrett's esophagus, manometry, pH study

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Hiatal Hernia

10.2310/surg.2046 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Kyle A. Perry ◽

Vivian L. Wang

Keyword(s):

Gastroesophageal Reflux ◽

Hiatal Hernia ◽

Barrett’S Esophagus ◽

Reflux Disease ◽

Barrett's Esophagus ◽

Paraesophageal Hernia ◽

Nissen Fundoplication ◽

Symptomatic Gerd

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is common, affecting approximately 18 to 27% of adult Americans, and can have a considerable impact on quality of life. Hiatal hernias are present in 80% of patients with symptomatic GERD. This review covers the basic pathophysiology, evaluation, and treatment algorithms for patients with GERD and hiatal hernia. Figures show normal gastroesophageal junction anatomy, treatment algorithm for patients with symptomatic GERD, schematic and endoscopic images of long segment Barrett's esophagus, a normal barium esophagogram, esophageal intraluminal pressures assessed by esophageal manometry, test results from a 48-hour wireless pH study, laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication, laparoscopic gastroesophageal junction reinforcement, classification of paraesophageal hernia, and endoscopic view of Cameron ulcers at the level of the diaphragm in the setting of a type III paraesophageal hernia. Tables list risk factors for GERD and a standardized approach to Nissen fundoplication. This review contains 10 figures, 3 tables, and 68 references. Keywords: Gastroesophageal reflux disease, GERD, hiatal hernia, paraesophageal hernia, anti-reflux surgery, Nissen fundoplication, Barrett's esophagus, manometry, pH study

The Genesis of Barrett Esophagus: Has a Histologic Transition From Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease–Damaged Epithelium to Columnar Metaplasia Ever Been Seen in Humans?

Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine ◽

10.5858/2005-129-164-tgobeh ◽

2005 ◽

Vol 129 (2) ◽

pp. 164-169 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Robert H. Riddell

Keyword(s):

Gastroesophageal Reflux ◽

Reflux Disease ◽

Molecular Mechanisms ◽

Barrett Esophagus ◽

Columnar Metaplasia ◽

Alkaline Reflux ◽

Protein Transcription ◽

Multilayered Epithelium

Abstract Has a histologic transition from gastroesophageal reflux disease–damaged epithelium to columnar metaplasia ever been seen in humans? The answer to this question seems to be that it has but that we either do not readily recognize it or it is not readily recognizable with regular light microscopy. There are at least 3 possible mechanisms for the genesis of Barrett esophagus. The first is ulceration at the gastroesophageal junction with subsequent repair by an epithelium that differentiates into Barrett epithelium. The second is metaplasia through multilayered epithelium. The third is creeping columnar metaplasia at the Z-line proximally followed by intestinalization. These 3 hypotheses may not be mutually exclusive, and all may be operative, depending on the local circumstances, amount of inflammation, erosion, ulcers, healing, acid and alkaline reflux, and use of proton pump inhibitors. Any of the epithelial types involved could be stable and not progress. They might even be reversible, which may also in part explain the mosaic of epithelial types that typify Barrett esophagus, and may be modified by any of the molecular mechanisms that turn protein transcription on and off (eg, promoter methylation, mutations). These mechanisms ultimately may also be involved in the genesis of neoplastic transformation.