Technical Aspects of Laparoscopic Surgery

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Rabl ◽  
Guilherme M. Campos ◽  
James G. Bittner IV

Laparoscopic surgery is now an integral part of general surgery and is used in almost all known surgical procedures. There are many advantages to laparoscopic surgery, including faster patient recovery, shorter hospital stay, decreased pain and analgesic requirements, and faster return to work. A thorough understanding of the different technical aspects of laparoscopic surgery is necessary to perform procedures correctly, as well as to avoid certain predictable difficulties and complications that can occur. This review details operating room setup and patient and surgery team positioning; the laparoscope and instruments used; laparoscopic suturing; laparoscopic training and simulators; when and why to convert to open surgery; and the use of single-port or single-incision laparoscopic surgery. Figures show a schematic representation of a ceiling-mounted articulated boom for laparoscopic surgery; blueprints and photographs of the first endoscope; images of an articulated 5 mm scope and high-definition camera head, assorted laparoscopic instruments, 10 and 5 mm LigaSure sealing devices and a 5 mm Harmonic scalpel, an Endoloop ligature with a 2-0 polyglactin tie, various sizes of the 5 mm Nathanson retractor and the round Snake retractor, and 5 mm needle drivers and a 10 mm Endo Stitch suturing device; and an illustration of laparoscopic suturing (using a square knot). Tables list patient positions used for laparoscopic surgical procedures, guidelines for optimal laparoscopic surgery suites, and staple heights and colors. This review contains 9 figures, 2 tables, and 78 references.

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshio Shiraishi ◽  
Tetsuro Tominaga ◽  
Takashi Nonaka ◽  
Kiyoaki Hamada ◽  
Masato Araki ◽  
...  

AbstractSingle-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has the potential to improve perioperative outcomes, including less postoperative pain, shorter operation time, less blood loss, and shorter hospital stay. However, SILS is technically difficult and needs a longer learning curve. Between April 2016 and September 2019, a total of 198 patients with clinical stage I/II right colon cancer underwent curative resection. In the case of the SILS approach, an organ retractor was usually used to overcome SILS-specific restrictions. The patients were divided into two groups by surgical approach: the SILS with organ retractor group (SILS-O, n = 33) and the conventional laparoscopic surgery group (LAC, n = 165). Clinical T status was significantly higher in the LAC group (p = 0.016). Operation time was shorter and blood loss was lower in the SILS-O group compared to the LAC group (117 vs. 197 min, p = 0.027; 10 vs. 25 mL, p = 0.024, respectively). In the SILS-O group, surgical outcomes including operation time, blood loss, number of retrieved lymph nodes, and postoperative complications were not significantly different between those performed by experts and by non-experts. Longer operation time (p = 0.041) was significantly associated with complications on univariate and multivariate analyses (odds ratio 2.514, 95%CI 1.047–6.035, p = 0.039). SILS-O was safe and feasible for right colon cancer. There is a potential to shorten the learning curve of SILS using an organ retractor.


2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. S181-S182
Author(s):  
AHF Brandão ◽  
MB Noviello ◽  
G Peret ◽  
B Lima ◽  
AS Santos-Filho

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 216-220
Author(s):  
Dariusz Łaski ◽  
Tomasz J. Stefaniak ◽  
Wojciech Makarewicz ◽  
Maciej Bobowicz ◽  
Jarosław Kobiela ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document