scholarly journals Block Bone Graft for Implant Placement

2004 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 306-314
Author(s):  
Takeya Uchida ◽  
Takuji Yoshida ◽  
Kouki Kashiwagi ◽  
Koichi Ito
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Block Bone Graft

scholarly journals Acellular mineralized allogenic block bone graft does not remodel during the 10 weeks following concurrent implant placement in a rabbit femoral model

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-48
Author(s):  
D. Joshua Cohen ◽  
Kayla M. Scott ◽  
Aniket N. Kulkarni ◽  
Jennifer S. Wayne ◽  
Barbara D. Boyan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Femoral Model ◽  
Block Bone Graft

Immediate Ridge Augmentation Using Autogenous Tooth Root as a Block Graft in a Periodontally Hopeless Extraction Site: A Pilot Study

2019 ◽  
pp. 0000-0000
Author(s):  
Shejali Jana ◽  
Raison Thomas ◽  
Tarun Kumar ◽  
Rucha Shah ◽  
Dhoom Singh Mehta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Bone Graft ◽  
Tooth Root ◽  
Defect Depth ◽  
Ridge Augmentation ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Extraction Site ◽  
Ridge Width ◽  
Atraumatic Extraction ◽  
Block Bone Graft

The aim of the our study was to assess the efficacy of autogenous tooth root as block bone graft in reconstructing the vertical and horizontal dimensions at periodontally hopeless extraction sites both clinically and radiographically. Methods: A total of 13 patients having a tooth with periodontally hopeless prognosis indicated for extraction were included in the study. Following atraumatic extraction the tooth was processed to create a decoronated cementum free dentin block which was used to augment the extraction socket. Results: The augmentation of periodontally hopeless socket with tooth block autograft resulted in gain of clinical ridge width of 5.9mm radiographically, apico-coronal defect depth reduced upto 8.2 mm (p 0.001) and gain in ridge width of 5.8 mm post-operatively after 6 months (p 0.001). Conclusion: The present study demonstrated the effectiveness of using tooth root as a block graft for ridge augmentation in the periodontally hopeless extraction site making it suitable for implant placement in future.

scholarly journals Implant Placement after Closure of Oroantral Communication by Sinus Bone Graft Using a Collagen Barrier Membrane in the Shape of a Pouch: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (6) ◽  
pp. 626
Author(s):  
Jae-Ha Baek ◽  
Byung-Ock Kim ◽  
Won-Pyo Lee
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Maxillary Sinusitis ◽  
Collagen Membrane ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Barrier Membrane ◽  
Membrane Perforation ◽  
Oroantral Communication ◽  
Sinus Membrane ◽  
Posterior Area

Oro-antral communication (OAC) acts as a pathway for bacteria between the maxillary sinus and oral cavity, and is a common complication after the removal of a dental implant or extraction of a tooth from the maxillary posterior area. In the case of an untreated OAC, oro-antral fistula develops and becomes epithelialized. We aimed to introduce a treatment for OAC closure via a sinus bone grafting procedure using bone tacks and a collagen membrane with an allograft. The procedure was performed by applying an absorbable membrane made in pouch form. This membrane acted as a barrier for closing the large sinus membrane perforation. Bone tacks were used to fix the membranes. Subsequently, the maxillary sinus was filled with the allograft, and the absorbable membrane was reapplied. Primary closure was achieved by performing a periosteum-releasing incision for a tension-free suture. After 6 months, sufficient bone dimensions were gained without any occurrence of maxillary sinusitis or recurrence of OAC. Additional bone grafts and implantation could be performed to rehabilitate the maxillary posterior area. We conclude that this technique might be a useful treatment for reconstructing the maxillary posterior area with simultaneous sinus bone graft and OAC closure.

Effect of Periosteum Attached to Autogenous Iliac Block Bone Graft on Bone Resorption in Rabbits

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 642-646
Author(s):  
Ki-Deog Park ◽  
Hooseok Hong ◽  
Seunggon Jung ◽  
Min-Suk Kook ◽  
Hee-Kyun Oh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Resorption ◽  
Bone Graft ◽  
Block Bone Graft

scholarly journals Immediate Implant Placement in Infected Sockets: A Consecutive Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashish Kakar ◽  
Kanupriya Kakar ◽  
Minas D. Leventis ◽  
Gaurav Jain
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Bone Graft Substitute ◽  
Graft Material ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Implant Surface ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Placement ◽  
Immediate Implant

Introduction: Immediate placement of implants in a fresh post-extraction socket is an increasingly popular and established treatment option. However, active infection in the extraction site may adversely affect the outcome of this procedure. This study was designed to assess the clinical results of immediate placement of dental implants in infected extraction sockets using a standardized protocol, which included (a) the use of an Er,Cr:YSGG laser for the decontamination of the infected socket prior to implant insertion, and (b) the utilization of an in situ hardening alloplastic bone graft substitute to augment the gap between the implant surface and the labial plate of bone. Patients and Methods: A retrospective record review was used to identify 68 patients who had implants placed as per the described protocol. A total of 126 implants were placed in 68 patients (65 implants in the maxilla, 61 implants in the mandible). The implants were loaded 136 ± 73 days (mean ± standard deviation; range: 37–400 days) after implant placement. Eight patients (16 implants) were subsequently lost to follow up. Results: 105 of the 110 implants (95.45%) placed immediately in the infected sites using the described protocol survived after prosthetic loading. Conclusion: Immediate implant placement in previously infected sites using the protocols mentioned in our study with laser decontamination of the socket, grafting with an in situ hardening alloplastic bone graft material and non-submerged healing shows a similar survival rate to the published success rates for immediate implants placed in non-infected sites.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document