scholarly journals Food habits of the frilled shark Chlamydoselachus anguineus collected from Suruga Bay, central Japan.

1991 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadashi Kubota ◽  
Yoshihisa Shiobara ◽  
Tsunemi Kubodera
Keyword(s):  
1973 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 267-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryuzo Marumo ◽  
Sachiko Nagasawa
Keyword(s):  

2004 ◽  
Vol 70 (6) ◽  
pp. 978-987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kouki KANOU ◽  
Mitsuhiko SANO ◽  
Hiroshi KOHNO
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 304-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taishi Suzuki ◽  
Seiki Takatsuku ◽  
Aki Higuchi ◽  
Ikki Saito

2000 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiro Horinouchi ◽  
Mitsuhiko Sano
Keyword(s):  

1996 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 161-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shotaro Yokoyama ◽  
Toru Koizumi ◽  
Ei'ichi Shibata

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Hayato Takada ◽  
Akiyoshi Sato ◽  
Setsuko Katsuta

Abstract Knowledge of food habits is essential for understanding the life history of a species; however, such information about the enigmatic Murina genus of bats is little known. In this study, we examined the food habits of Murina hilgendorfi and Murina ussuriensis over four years in Hayakawa, central Japan, using traditional morphological fecal analysis. Fragments of arthropods of six orders (five identified families), and of five orders (five identified families), were found in the feces of M. hilgendorfi and M. ussuriensis, respectively. Both species consumed wingless arthropods (caterpillars and spiders), insects that rarely fly (ground beetles and bush crickets), or diurnal insects (dragonflies and hoverflies; i.e., that are resting at night) during the night, which is a clear indication of gleaning behavior in these bats. In spring, the large-bodied M. hilgendorfi more frequently consumed hard-bodied insects such as beetles and bush crickets, whereas the small-bodied M. ussuriensis more frequently consumed soft-bodied insects such as caterpillars, moths, spiders, and dipterans, suggesting that the body size difference influences their food habits, which may have contributed to food resource partitioning between these closely related bats. For M. hilgendorfi, beetles were the main prey in spring and autumn, while caterpillars and grasshoppers were more frequently consumed in spring and autumn, respectively, suggesting that they may have changed prey items according to seasonal fluctuations in food availability. To our knowledge, this study provides the first record of differences in the food habits of these two species.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document