scholarly journals Genetic Risk Score Enhances Coronary Artery Disease Risk Prediction in Individuals With Type 1 Diabetes

Diabetes Care ◽  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raija Lithovius ◽  
Anni A. Antikainen ◽  
Stefan Mutter ◽  
Erkka Valo ◽  
Carol Forsblom ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE Individuals with type 1 diabetes are at a high lifetime risk of coronary artery disease (CAD), calling for early interventions. This study explores the use of a genetic risk score (GRS) for CAD risk prediction, compares it to established clinical markers, and investigates its performance according to the age and pharmacological treatment. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This study in 3,295 individuals with type 1 diabetes from the Finnish Diabetic Nephropathy Study (467 incident CAD, 14.8 years follow-up) used three risk scores: a GRS, a validated clinical score, and their combined score. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated with Cox regression, and model performances were compared with the Harrell C-index (C-index). RESULTS A HR of 6.7 for CAD was observed between the highest and the lowest 5th percentile of the GRS (P = 1.8 × 10−6). The performance of GRS (C-index = 0.562) was similar to HbA1c (C-index = 0.563, P = 0.96 for difference), HDL (C-index = 0.571, P = 0.6), and total cholesterol (C-index = 0.594, P = 0.1). The GRS was not correlated with the clinical score (r = −0.013, P = 0.5). The combined score outperformed the clinical score (C-index = 0.813 vs. C-index = 0.820, P = 0.003). The GRS performed better in individuals below the median age (38.6 years) compared with those above (C-index = 0.637 vs. C-index = 0.546). CONCLUSIONS A GRS identified individuals at high risk of CAD and worked better in younger individuals. GRS was also an independent risk factor for CAD, with a predictive power comparable to that of HbA1c and HDL and total cholesterol, and when incorporated into a clinical model, modestly improved the predictions. The GRS promises early risk stratification in clinical practice by enhancing the prediction of CAD.

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raija Lithovius ◽  
Anni A. Antikainen ◽  
Stefan Mutter ◽  
Erkka Valo ◽  
Carol Forsblom ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE Individuals with type 1 diabetes are at a high lifetime risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) calling for early interventions. This study explores the use of a genetic risk score (GRS) for CAD risk prediction, compares it to established clinical markers and investigates its performance according to the age and pharmacological treatment. <p>RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This study in 3,295 individuals with type 1 diabetes from the Finnish Diabetic Nephropathy Study (467 incident CAD, 14.8 years follow-up) employed three risk scores: a GRS, a validated clinical score and their combined score. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated with Cox regression and model performances compared with Harrel’s C-index. </p> <p>RESULTS A HR of 6.7 for CAD was observed between the highest and the lowest 5<sup>th</sup> percentile of the GRS (<i>P</i>=1.8×10<sup>-6</sup>). The performance of GRS (C-index [C] 0.562) was similar to HbA<sub>1c</sub> (C=0.563, <i>p</i>-value for difference 0.96), HDL (C=0.571, <i>P</i>=0.6) and total cholesterol (C=0.594, <i>P</i>=0.1). The GRS was not correlated with the clinical score (<i>r</i>=-0.013, <i>P</i>=0.5). The combined score outperformed the clinical score (C=0.813 vs C=0.820, <i>P</i>=0.003). The GRS performed better in individuals below the median age (38.6 years) compared to those above (C=0.637 vs C=0.546). </p> <p>CONCLUSIONS A GRS identified individuals at high risk of CAD and worked better in younger individuals. GRS was also an independent risk factor for CAD with a predictive power comparable to that of HbA<sub>1c</sub>, HDL and total cholesterol and, when incorporated into a clinical model, modestly improved the predictions. The GRS promises early risk stratification in clinical practice by enhancing the prediction of CAD. </p>


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raija Lithovius ◽  
Anni A. Antikainen ◽  
Stefan Mutter ◽  
Erkka Valo ◽  
Carol Forsblom ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE Individuals with type 1 diabetes are at a high lifetime risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) calling for early interventions. This study explores the use of a genetic risk score (GRS) for CAD risk prediction, compares it to established clinical markers and investigates its performance according to the age and pharmacological treatment. <p>RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This study in 3,295 individuals with type 1 diabetes from the Finnish Diabetic Nephropathy Study (467 incident CAD, 14.8 years follow-up) employed three risk scores: a GRS, a validated clinical score and their combined score. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated with Cox regression and model performances compared with Harrel’s C-index. </p> <p>RESULTS A HR of 6.7 for CAD was observed between the highest and the lowest 5<sup>th</sup> percentile of the GRS (<i>P</i>=1.8×10<sup>-6</sup>). The performance of GRS (C-index [C] 0.562) was similar to HbA<sub>1c</sub> (C=0.563, <i>p</i>-value for difference 0.96), HDL (C=0.571, <i>P</i>=0.6) and total cholesterol (C=0.594, <i>P</i>=0.1). The GRS was not correlated with the clinical score (<i>r</i>=-0.013, <i>P</i>=0.5). The combined score outperformed the clinical score (C=0.813 vs C=0.820, <i>P</i>=0.003). The GRS performed better in individuals below the median age (38.6 years) compared to those above (C=0.637 vs C=0.546). </p> <p>CONCLUSIONS A GRS identified individuals at high risk of CAD and worked better in younger individuals. GRS was also an independent risk factor for CAD with a predictive power comparable to that of HbA<sub>1c</sub>, HDL and total cholesterol and, when incorporated into a clinical model, modestly improved the predictions. The GRS promises early risk stratification in clinical practice by enhancing the prediction of CAD. </p>


Diabetologia ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 259-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingchuan Guo ◽  
Sebhat A. Erqou ◽  
Rachel G. Miller ◽  
Daniel Edmundowicz ◽  
Trevor J. Orchard ◽  
...  

Diabetes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1931-P
Author(s):  
KATHERINE V. WILLIAMS ◽  
CHRISTINA M. SHAY ◽  
JULIE PRICE ◽  
TREVOR J. ORCHARD ◽  
DAVID KELLEY

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document