scholarly journals Risk of total knee replacement after proximal tibia fracture: a register-based study of 7,841 patients

2022 ◽  
pp. 179-184
Author(s):  
Valtteri S Tapper ◽  
Konsta J Pamilo ◽  
Jaason J Haapakoski ◽  
Alar Toom ◽  
Juha Paloneva

Background and purpose — Post-traumatic knee osteoarthritis following proximal tibia fracture (PTF) is a common complication that may lead to total knee replacement as secondary treatment (TKRS). We determined the risk of TKRS following PTF, whether treated nonoperatively or operatively, and compared the results with a 38-fold control group without prior PTF. Patients and methods — We identified all patients over 18 years of age in Finland with PTF treated during the period 2009–2018 from the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register (FHDR) and Finnish Arthroplasty Register (FAR). Age, sex, treatment method, follow-up time, and possible TKRS were recorded. Results — 7,701 patients were treated for PTF during the period 2009–2018. Over the 5.1-year (SD 3.1) follow-up, TKRS was performed in 340 (4.3%) patients with a prior PTF after a mean of 2.1 (SD 2.0) years post-fracture. TKRS was needed in 138 (3.7%, HR 1.8) patients in the nonoperatively treated group and in 202 (5.0%, HR 3.2) patients in the operatively treated group. Operative treatment, female sex, and high age were identified as risk factors for TKRS. The incidence of TKRS was highest during the first 2 years after fracture and remained elevated throughout the follow-up. Interpretation — Patients with a prior PTF had a 1.8- to 3.2-fold higher risk of TKRS compared with controls during the first 5 years post-fracture. Risk of TKRS was associated with an operatively treated PTF, female sex, and high age. The patients in the operative group likely sustained more complex fractures, while female sex and age may be explained by more osteoporotic bone quality.

The Knee ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 329-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Yeoh ◽  
Nick Nicolaou ◽  
Richard Goddard ◽  
Henry Willmott ◽  
Kim Miles ◽  
...  

1991 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-58
Author(s):  
Eiji Kawaguchi ◽  
Tetuya Hirano ◽  
Kunihiko Tomoda ◽  
Kenichi Yamashiro ◽  
Kiminori Sakamoto ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Baig ◽  
M Ferrari ◽  
A Lukaszewicz

Abstract Background There is a longstanding culture of repeat x-rays after total knee replacement (TKR) as part of follow up, often combined with a clinic review. This is to check that the prosthesis is in a satisfactory position. There are inherently a number of issues with this historic approach including exposure of patients to further radiation who may be asymptomatic, time delays in busy clinics or x-ray departments and costs. Objectives The aim of this audit was to assess whether follow up plain films after TKR are methodically undertaken and of benefit to confirm satisfactory appearance if immediate post -operative x-rays were unremarkable. The findings of a six month follow up x-ray was specifically evaluated. The secondary aim was to establish the timing of further follow up x-rays within the department. Method 200 patients were included within the analysis, they all received a TKR at a major trauma centre, over a one-year period between December 2017 and December 2018. Results It was found that 100% of those patients having a post-operative film had a satisfactory appearance. 78% of patients had at least one further follow op x-ray of which 99.4% were satisfactory. Up to five follow up x-rays were taken with 53.5% of patients having a follow up x-ray at 6 months. Conclusions From the above results there is minimal, if any, evidence within the data set to support routine, additional follow up imaging if initial post-operative films are satisfactory, and the patient is asymptomatic.


1997 ◽  
Vol 79 (4) ◽  
pp. 575-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
DAVID R. DIDUCH ◽  
JOHN N. INSALL ◽  
W. NORMAN SCOTT ◽  
GILES R. SCUDERI ◽  
DAVID FONT-RODRIGUEZ

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document