scholarly journals The Effect of Surface Preparation and Luting Agent on Bond Strength to a Zirconium-based Ceramic

10.2341/07-14 ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 623-630 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. P. Senyilmaz ◽  
W. M. Palin ◽  
A. C. C. Shortall ◽  
F. J. T. Burke
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Surface Preparation ◽  
Adhesive Layer ◽  
Tooth Size ◽  
Luting Cements ◽  
Luting Agent ◽  
Adhesive Luting ◽  
Ceramic Restorations ◽  
Effect Of Surface

Clinical Relevance Although clinical situations may exist where the adhesive luting of high-density milled ceramics for crown or fixed partial dentures are not required, certain clinical situations, such as the chairside repair of existing ceramic restorations, poor retention or inadequate abutment tooth size, will require a durable adhesive layer between the resin and ceramic. This study investigates the efficacy of modern “self-adhesive” luting cements on a zirconia-based ceramic following various surface preparations

Effect of Surface Preparation on Bond Strength of Resin Luting Cements to Dentin

2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 624-633 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Peerzada ◽  
C. K. Y. Yiu ◽  
N. Hiraishi ◽  
F. R. Tay ◽  
N. M. King
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Tungsten Carbide ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Surface Preparation ◽  
Luting Cements ◽  
Bond Strengths ◽  
Self Etch ◽  
Effect Of Surface

Clinical Relevance For Panavia F2.0, higher bond strengths are achieved on dentin surfaces prepared with tungsten carbide bur. Proper bur selection is essential to optimize dentin adhesion of self-etch resin luting cements.

Durability of Enamel Bonding Using Two-step Self-etch Systems on Ground and Unground Enamel

10.2341/07-42 ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. D. Loguercio ◽  
S. K. Moura ◽  
A. Pellizzaro ◽  
K. Dal-Bianco ◽  
R. T. Patzlaff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Surface Preparation ◽  
The Self ◽  
Self Etch ◽  
Effect Of Surface

Clinical Relevance The effect of surface preparation was adhesive-dependent. Improvements in resin-enamel bond strength after enamel preparation were observed only for AdheSE and Optibond Solo plus Self-Etch Primer. Among the self-etch systems, mild, self-etch Clearfil SE Bond showed the highest bond strength values. No degradation of resin-enamel bonds was observed after 12 months of water storage, regardless of the adhesive tested.

The Influence of Luting Systems on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Dentin to Indirect Resin-based Composite and Ceramic Restorations

2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 328-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. D'Arcangelo ◽  
F. De Angelis ◽  
M. D'Amario ◽  
S. Zazzeroni ◽  
C. Ciampoli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Glass Ceramic ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
The Self ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Luting Agents ◽  
Adhesive Luting ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Ceramic Restorations ◽  
Self Etch

Clinical Relevance Compared to self-etch and self-adhesive luting systems, the two etch-and-rinse luting agents evaluated in the current study provided more reliable bonding when used to bond indirect resin-based composite restorations to sound dentin. On the contrary, the self-adhesive luting system showed the highest mean bond strength for the cementation of glass ceramic restorations.

The Effect of Surface Treatments on the Micro-shear Bond Strength of a Resin Luting Agent and Four All-ceramic Systems

10.2341/08-87 ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 399-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. M. P. Torres ◽  
G. A. Borges ◽  
A. M. Spohr ◽  
A. A. D. B. Cury ◽  
S. Yadav ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Ceramic Surface ◽  
Ceramic Composition ◽  
Luting Agent ◽  
All Ceramic ◽  
Effect Of Surface

Clinical Relevance The bond strength between ceramics and a resin luting agent is affected by the ceramic surface treatment, which is dependent on the ceramic composition.

Effects of ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength of an adhesive luting agent to CAD–CAM ceramic

2007 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 282-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Peumans ◽  
K. Hikita ◽  
J. De Munck ◽  
K. Van Landuyt ◽  
A. Poitevin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Ceramic Surface ◽  
Luting Agent ◽  
Adhesive Luting ◽  
Cad Cam

Effect of Immediate Dentin Sealing on the Bond Strength of Monolithic Zirconia to Human Dentin

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. E167-E179
Author(s):  
AE Rigos ◽  
C Dandoulaki ◽  
E Kontonasaki ◽  
M Kokoti ◽  
L Papadopoulou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Silica Coating ◽  
Fracture Type ◽  
Surface Pretreatment ◽  
Luting Agent ◽  
Adhesive Luting ◽  
Human Dentin ◽  
Cad Cam ◽  
Monolithic Zirconia ◽  
Dentin Conditioning

SUMMARY Objective: This study evaluated the shear bond strength (SBS) of pretreated monolithic zirconia surfaces bonded to human dentin following immediate dentin sealing (IDS) using two different self-adhesive resin luting agents. Methods and Materials: Sixty intact human third molars were collected, stored, sectioned appropriately, and molded according to ISO 29022:2013, resulting in 120 dentin specimens. Ceramic cylindrical specimens were fabricated using CAD/CAM technology and sintered as recommended (final bonding area A=2.56 mm2). Specimens were randomly assigned to eight groups (15≥n≥14) depending on dentin conditioning method (IDS or delayed dentin sealing [DDS]), zirconia surface pretreatment (airborne particle abrasion [APA] with 50 μm Al2O3 particles at 3 bar for 10 seconds or tribochemical silica coating [TBC] with 30 μm CoJet particles at 2.8 bar for 10 seconds), and adhesive luting agent type (Panavia F2.0 [PAN] or PermaCem Dual Smartmix [PER]). Bonded specimens were water-stored (37°C, 24 hours) and subjected to SBS testing (50-kgF load cell, 1 mm/min). Fracture type was evaluated with stereomicroscopy. Data (MPa) were statistically analyzed using three-way analysis of variance (α=0.05). Results: All factors significantly affected SBS values (p<0.001). Dentin conditioning method presented the greatest effect. Mean SBS values ranged from 12.603 MPa (PER-APA-DDS) to 40.704 MPa (PER-TBC-IDS). Based on the fracture type, adhesive failures at the luting agent–zirconia interface were the least common. Conclusion: Bonding strategies for monolithic zirconia restorations could potentially benefit from IDS, regardless of the adhesive luting agent system used.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document