scholarly journals The Effect of Distance and Tooth Structure on Laser Fluorescence Caries Detection

2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 150-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Markowitz ◽  
RM Stenvall ◽  
M Graye

Clinical RelevanceDevices used to aid occlusal caries diagnosis are supposed to detect small lesions deep in the pit and fissure system. In detecting small occlusal caries, distance and tooth structure may separate the instrument and the carious lesion. In this study distance and tooth structure were found to reduce the ability of the DIAGNOdent to detect caries.

2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 234-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Seremidi ◽  
P Lagouvardos ◽  
K Kavvadia

Clinical Relevance Laser/light fluorescence devices were highly reliable for occlusal caries diagnosis in permanent teeth but not superior in accuracy to visual methods.


2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. E23-E31 ◽  
Author(s):  
EPS Tagliaferro ◽  
A Valsecki Junior ◽  
FL Rosell ◽  
SRC Silva ◽  
JL Riley ◽  
...  

SUMMARY The aim of this study was to assess practices related to diagnosis of dental caries among dentists (n=217) from Araraquara, São Paulo State, Brazil. Data on sociodemographic information and practitioner characteristics were collected using a pretested questionnaire, and data on practices related to caries diagnosis were gathered by using a translated and culturally adapted questionnaire from the US National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. Descriptive statistics and regression analyses were used for data analysis. Respondents reported using in most of their patients radiographs (Rx) to diagnose proximal caries (59%), explorer (Ex) for the diagnosis of occlusal caries (64%) and on the margins of existing restorations (79%), as well as air jet (AJ) with drying (92%). Magnification (M) (25%), fiber optic transillumination (FOTI; 14%), and laser fluorescence (LF) (3%) were used in the minority of patients. Regression analysis revealed that the following dentists' characteristics were significantly associated (p<0.05) with the use of diagnostic methods on a greater percentage of their patients: advanced degree (Rx, FOTI), higher percentage of patients with individualized caries prevention (Rx, FOTI, M), more years since dental school graduation (Ex, M), and work in an exclusively private practice model (LF). In conclusion, most Brazilian dentists from Araraquara reported they most commonly use visual, tactile, and radiographic imaging for the diagnosis of dental caries. Some dentists' characteristics, such as time from dental school graduation and having a postgraduation course, were associated with the use of certain diagnostic methods.


2008 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 295-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Baffi Diniz ◽  
Jonas de Almeida Rodrigues ◽  
Andréia Bolzan de Paula ◽  
Rita de Cássia Loiola Cordeiro

2002 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 129-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanna M Alwas-Danowska ◽  
Alphons J.M Plasschaert ◽  
Stanislaw Suliborski ◽  
Emiel H Verdonschot

2016 ◽  
Vol 124 (2) ◽  
pp. 188-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lia S. Castilho ◽  
Fernanda V. M. D. Cotta ◽  
Audrey C. Bueno ◽  
Allyson N. Moreira ◽  
Efigênia F. Ferreira ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 597-607 ◽  
Author(s):  
AA Al-Khatrash ◽  
YM Badran ◽  
QD Alomari

Clinical Relevance Occlusal caries is the predominant form of dental caries at the present time. This study documents the variability in detection and treatment of occlusal caries among dentists graduating from different dental schools around the world and practicing in Kuwait. Furthermore, it shows that dentists tend to overtreat occlusal caries.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Friederike Litzenburger ◽  
Gerrit Schäfer ◽  
Reinhard Hickel ◽  
Jan Kühnisch ◽  
Katrin Heck

Abstract Background The purpose of this prospective clinical diagnostic study with validation was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of near-infrared transillumination (NIRT), laser fluorescence measurement (LF), alternating current impedance spectroscopy (ACIS) and their combinations as adjunct methods to visual examination (VE) for occlusal caries detection using a hybrid reference standard. Methods Ninety-six first and second non-cavitated permanent molars from 76 individuals (mean age 24.2) were investigated using (VE) (ICDAS) and bitewing radiography (BWR), as well as NIRT, LF and ACIS. The findings of BWR and NIRT were evaluated by two examiners while the other examinations were conducted by one calibrated dentist. The hybrid reference standard consisted of non-operative validation based on the results of VE and BWR and operative validation. Statistical analysis included cross-tabulations, calculation of sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve at three diagnostic thresholds: caries in general, enamel caries and dentin caries. Results NIRT, LF and ACIS exhibited high sensitivity for caries in general [1.00 (1.00–1.00), 0.77 (0.65–0.88), 0.75 (0.63–0.87)) and for dentin caries (0.97 (0.91–1.03), 0.76 (0.76–0.90), 0.64 (0.47–0.80)]. Sensitivity values for enamel caries were weak (0.21, 0.11, 0.37). Specificity values did not fall below 0.65 (NIRT) for all categories and methods, except for NIRT at the caries detection threshold (0.27). A combination of LF and ACIS with VE improved the diagnostic performance at the overall and the enamel caries threshold. The other methods showed fair to excellent discrimination at the overall caries threshold (NIRT 0.64, LF 0.89 and ACIS 0.86) and acceptable discrimination at the dentin caries threshold (NIRT 0.82, LF 0.81 and ACIS 0.79). AUROC for enamel caries exhibited the weakest discrimination. Accuracy was 65.6% for VE, 69.8% for BWR, 50.0% for NIRT, 53.1% for LF and 74.0% for ACIS. Reliability assessment for BWR and NIRT showed at least substantial agreements for all analyses. Conclusions The methods, NIRT, LF and ACIS, revealed different potential but no impeccable performance for occlusal caries detection. All are suitable instruments to detect hidden carious lesion in dentin. As auxiliaries to VE, LF and ACIS showed an increase in diagnostic performance.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melek Tassoker ◽  
Sevgi Ozcan ◽  
Said Karabekiroglu

Objective: Current diagnostic tools for non-cavitated occlusal caries are not very reliable. For this reason, newer systems need to be developed. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of visual inspection (ICDAS-II), laser fluorescence (DIAGNOdent pen), and the near-infrared transillumination technique (DIAGNOcam) in the detection of non-cavitated occlusal caries lesions under clinical and laboratory conditions in 90 third molar teeth planned for extraction. Materials and Methods:Ninety third molar teeth were firstly examined in clinical conditions, scored according to ICDAS-II criteria, and examined with DIAGNOdent pen and DIAGNOcam devices. After finishing the clinical examination, the teeth were re-evaluated shortly after the extractions with the same methods. Then, the teeth were sectioned for histological validation according to Downer’s criteria. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated based on the histological results. Results: For the D0–D1–4 threshold, the area under the ROC curve values ranged between 0.754 and 0.881 for all systems. Sensitivity values ranged between 80.5 and 96.1%, and specificity values ranged between 61.5 and 84.6% for the three caries detection methods. DIAGNOcam had the best correlation value (0.616) according to histological observations and demonstrated a sensitivity rate of 96.1%, a specificity rate of 61.5%, and an accuracy rate of 91.1%. Conclusions: DIAGNOcam was found to be the most effective method for the diagnosis of occlusal caries without cavitation in permanent molar teeth.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document