The role of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scan in biochemical recurrence after primary treatment for prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature

Author(s):  
Ahmed Eissa ◽  
Ahmed Elsherbiny ◽  
Rafael F. Coelho ◽  
Jens Rassweiler ◽  
John W. Davis ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 98-104
Author(s):  
Mehmet Erdoğan ◽  
Emine Elif Özkan ◽  
Sefa Alperen Öztürk ◽  
Mustafa Yıldız ◽  
Sevim Süreyya Şengül

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Éder Silveira Brazão ◽  
André Marcondes Braga Ribeiro ◽  
Eduardo Nobrega Pereira Lima ◽  
Walter Henriques da Costa ◽  
Stênio de Cássio Zequi

2015 ◽  
Vol 193 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Oderda ◽  
Paolo Gontero ◽  
Guglielmo Melloni ◽  
Stefania Munegato ◽  
Marco Falcone ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rang Wang ◽  
Guohua Shen ◽  
Mingxing Huang ◽  
Rong Tian

BackgroundDiagnosing the biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer (PCa) is a clinical challenge, and early detection of BCR can help patients receive optimal treatment. We conducted a meta-analysis to define the diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT using 18F-labeled choline, fluciclovine, and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) in patients with BCR.MethodsMultiple databases were searched until March 30, 2021. We included studies investigating the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-choline, 18F-fluciclovine, and 18F-PSMA PET/CT in patients with BCR. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and detection rate of 18F-labeled tracers were calculated with a random-effects model.ResultsA total of 46 studies met the included criteria; 17, 16, and 13 studies focused on 18F-choline, fluciclovine, and PSMA, respectively. The pooled sensitivities of 18F-choline and 18F-fluciclovine were 0.93 (95% CI, 0.85–0.98) and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.65–0.897), and the specificities were 0.91 (95% CI, 0.73–0.97) and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.50–0.79), respectively. The pooled detection rates of 18F-labeled choline, fluciclovine and PSMA were 66, 74, and 83%, respectively. Moreover, the detection rates of 18F-labeled choline, fluciclovine, and PSMA were 35, 23, and 58% for a PSA level less than 0.5 ng/ml; 41, 46, and 75% for a PSA level of 0.5–0.99 ng/ml; 62, 57, and 86% for a PSA level of 1.0–1.99 ng/ml; 80, 92, and 94% for a PSA level more than 2.0 ng/ml.ConclusionThese three 18F-labeled tracers are promising for detecting BCR in prostate cancer patients, with 18F-choline showing superior diagnostic accuracy. In addition, the much higher detection rates of 18F-PSMA showed its superiority over other tracers, particularly in low PSA levels.Systematic Review RegistrationPROSPERO, identifier CRD42020212531.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13-13
Author(s):  
Andrew Schmidt ◽  
Jeffrey C. Goh ◽  
Manoj Bhatt ◽  
Paul Thomas ◽  
Aneta Suder

13 Background: The low sensitivity of standard imaging (SI) techniques in detecting metastases (Ms) may lead to unnecessary local treatment for patients (Pts) with newly diagnosed or recurrent prostate cancer (PC). Ga-68-PSMA (Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen)-PET-CT is a novel imaging technique with increased sensitivity in detection of PC especially at low PSA values and may change the decision to pursue primary local or salvage treatment. This study quantified changes in definitive local treatment secondary to occult Ms detected on Ga-68-PSMA not visualized on SI. Methods: A retrospective study was performed of 509 consecutive PSMA scans (and 481 Pts) at our tertiary cancer centre, the Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital between Sept 2014 and Dec 2015. PSMA imaging was compared with a CT scan and bone scan to determine whether PSMA results altered the decision to pursue local treatment. Results: 81 (16%) Pts had PSMA-PET-CT scan and no Ms on SI, 40 prior to definitive local treatment and 41 as work up for recurrence. 9/40 Pts (23%) undergoing primary work-up had PSMA-identified Ms not visible on SI and altered these patients treatment pathway (mean PSA 20.5 ng/mL). Because of PSMA-diagnosed Ms, 3 did not receive local treatment. 4 had pelvic nodal involvement and received definitive radiotherapy (RT) including nodal fields. 2 Pts proceeded to radical prostatectomy with the addition of lymph node dissection. 41 Pts investigated for recurrence following local treatment had SI for comparison, (mean PSA 4.7, range 0.11 – 35 ng/mL). 11/41 (27%) were found to have distant or nodal Ms not visualized on SI. 7/11 with prior surgery did not proceed to salvage RT and the remaining Pts who had Ms were referred for an earlier medical oncology opinion. In total 20/81 (25%) of Pts had a direct change in treatment due to the additional information conferred by PSMA imaging. Conclusions: PSMA is more sensitive in the detection of prostate cancer Ms for patients being evaluated for primary treatment or looking for recurrence following local treatment. These results show clinically meaningful changes in management with avoidance of local treatment because of enhanced detection of metastases.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document