Acquired resistance to irradiation or docetaxel is not associated with cross-resistance to cisplatin in prostate cancer cell lines

Purpose Platinum chemotherapy can be considered to treat metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with features of neuroendocrine differentiation. However, platinum compounds are generally only applied after the failure of multiple prior-line treatment options. This study investigated whether acquired resistance against ionizing radiation or docetaxel chemotherapy—two commonly applied treatment modalities in prostate cancer—influences the cisplatin (CDDP) tolerance in mCRPC cell line models. Methods Age-matched parental as well as radio- or docetaxel-resistant DU145 and PC-3 cell lines were treated with CDDP and their sensitivity was assessed by measurements of growth rates, viability, apoptosis, metabolic activity and colony formation ability. Results The data suggest that docetaxel resistance does not influence CDDP tolerance in all tested docetaxel-resistant cell lines. Radio-resistance was associated with sensitization to CDDP in PC-3, but not in DU145 cells. In general, DU145 cells tolerated higher CDDP concentrations than PC-3 cells regardless of acquired resistances. Furthermore, non-age-matched treatment-naïve PC-3 cells exhibited significantly different CDDP tolerances. Conclusion Like patients, different mCRPC cell lines exhibit significant variability regarding CDDP tolerance. The presented in vitro data suggest that previous radiation treatment may be associated with a moderate sensitization to CDDP in an isogenic and age-matched setting. Therefore, previous radiotherapy or docetaxel chemotherapy might be no contraindication against initiation of platinum chemotherapy in selected mCRPC patients.

Oncological outcomes of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with different therapies sequences after completion of docetaxel: a retrospective study in Songklanagarind Hospital

Objective: Many treatment options of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after docetaxel chemotherapy have proved efficacious in clinical trials but, to date, knowledge regarding oncological outcomes is limited. Materials and Methods: We assessed the oncological outcome of 4 drugs (abi- raterone acetate, cabazetaxel, enzalutamide and ketoconazole) in a normal clinical setting in a university-based hospital. Our cohort consisted of 69 patients with post-docetaxel mCRPC. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoint was predicted factor associated overall survival with all sec- ond-line mCRPC treatment outcomes according to the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Results: This cohort consisted of 69 patients with progressive mCRPC after docetaxel chemotherapy. Median overall survival following treatment with abiraterone acetate and ketoconazole was 25.92 and 9.59 months respectively (p < 0.05). Overall survival rates at 1-year following abiraterone acetate, cabazetaxel, enzalutamide and ketoconazole therapy were 76.3%, 83.3%, 100% and 41.9%, respectively. Multivariable analysis found that abiraterone acetate, cabazitaxel and enzalutamide significantly improved survival in comparison to ketoconazole (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Analysis of overall survival following second-line treatment of mCRPC post docetaxel in our study statistically significantly confirmed that abiraterone acetate, cabazitaxel and enzalutamide improve overall survival in comparison to ketoconazole. The study also found that enzalutamide treatment resulted in better outcomes in comparison to the other drugs.

The LEDGF/p75 Integrase Binding Domain Interactome Contributes to the Survival, Clonogenicity, and Tumorsphere Formation of Docetaxel-Resistant Prostate Cancer Cells

Patients with prostate cancer (PCa) receiving docetaxel chemotherapy invariably develop chemoresistance. The transcription co-activator lens epithelium-derived growth factor p75 (LEDGF/p75), also known as DFS70 and PSIP1, is upregulated in several human cancers, including PCa and promotes resistance to docetaxel and other drugs. The C-terminal region of LEDGF/p75 contains an integrase binding domain (IBD) that tethers nuclear proteins, including the HIV-1 integrase and transcription factors, to active chromatin to promote viral integration and transcription of cellular survival genes. Here, we investigated the contribution of the LEDGF/p75 IBD interactome to PCa chemoresistance. Quantitative immunoblotting revealed that LEDGF/p75 and its IBD-interacting partners are endogenously upregulated in docetaxel-resistant PCa cell lines compared to docetaxel-sensitive parental cells. Using specific human autoantibodies, we co-immunoprecipitated LEDGF/p75 with its endogenous IBD-interacting partners JPO2, menin, MLL, IWS1, ASK1, and PogZ, as well as transcription factors c-MYC and HRP2, in docetaxel-resistant cells, and confirmed their nuclear co-localization by confocal microscopy. Depletion of LEDGF/p75 and selected interacting partners robustly decreased the survival, clonogenicity, and tumorsphere formation capacity of docetaxel-resistant cells. These results implicate the LEDGF/p75 IBD interactome in PCa chemoresistance and could lead to novel therapeutic strategies targeting this protein complex for the treatment of docetaxel-resistant tumors.

Safety and Efficacy of Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors Compared With Docetaxel for NSCLC: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors versus docetaxel for non-small cell lung cancer by meta-analysis.Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors versus docetaxel on the treatment of NSCLC were searched in CNKI, WF, VIP, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and evaluated the risk of bias of eligible studies. Meta-analysis was performed by RevMan5.3 software.Results: Compared with the use of docetaxel chemotherapy for NSCLC, the overall survival and progression-free survival of the anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors regimen are better [overall survival: (HR= 0.73, 95%CI:0.69∼0.77, P&lt;0.00001], progression-free survival: (HR= 0.89, 95%CI:0.83∼0.94, P&lt;0.00001]), and lower incidence of treatment-related grade 3 or higher adverse events ([OR=0.20, 95% CI: 0.13∼0.31, P&lt;0.00001]).Conclusion: Compared with the docetaxel chemotherapy regimen, the anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors has certain advantages in terms of efficacy and safety. The results still need to be confirmed by a multi-center, large sample, and high-quality research.

Surface-enhanced raman spectroscopy of serum predicts sensitivity to docetaxel-based chemotherapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

Docetaxel-based chemotherapy, as the first-line treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), has succeeded in helping quite a number of patients to improve quality of life and prolong survival time. However, almost half of mCRPC patients are not sensitive to docetaxel chemotherapy initially. This study aimed to establish models to predict sensitivity to docetaxel chemotherapy in patients with mCRPC by using serum surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS). A total of 32 mCPRC patients who underwent docetaxel chemotherapy at our center from July 2016 to March 2018 were included in this study. Patients were dichotomized in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response group ([Formula: see text]) versus PSA failure group ([Formula: see text]) according to the response to docetaxel. 64 matched spectra from 32 mCRPC patients were obtained by using SERS of serum at baseline ([Formula: see text]0) and after 1 cycle of docetaxel chemotherapy ([Formula: see text]1). Comparing Raman peaks of serum samples at baseline ([Formula: see text]0) between two groups, significant differences revealed at the peaks of 638, 810, 890 ([Formula: see text]) and 1136[Formula: see text]cm[Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]). The prediction models of peak 1363[Formula: see text]cm[Formula: see text] and principal component analysis and linear discriminant analysis (PCA–LDA) based on Raman data were established, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the prediction models were 71%, 80% and 69%, 78% through the way of leave-one-out cross-validation. According to the results of five-cross-validation, the PCA–LDA model revealed an accuracy of 0.73 and AUC of 0.83.

The efficacy of enzalutamide (ENZA) plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) on bone oligometastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: A post hoc analysis of ARCHES.

5071 Background: In ARCHES (NCT02677896), ENZA + ADT reduced the risk of radiographic progression and improved secondary clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) with variable patterns of disease spread over placebo (PBO) + ADT. This post hoc analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ENZA + ADT in patients with bone oligometastatic mHSPC compared to polymetastatic mHSPC in ARCHES. Methods: Patients with mHSPC (n = 1150) were randomized 1:1 to ENZA (160 mg/day) + ADT or PBO + ADT, stratified by disease volume and prior docetaxel chemotherapy. This post hoc analysis included patients with bone metastases only, categorized as oligometastatic (1–≤5 metastases) or as polymetastatic (≥6 metastases) based on central review at screening. Efficacy outcomes were compared across treatment arms. Results: Of the ARCHES population with bone metastases (n = 512), the largest subgroup included patients with ≤5 metastases (ENZA + ADT, n = 160; PBO + ADT, n = 136). Baseline characteristics were generally comparable between treatment arms and across subgroups. When compared to PBO + ADT, ENZA + ADT improved rPFS and secondary endpoints in patients with ≤5 metastases (Table). Similar results were observed across other oligometastatic subgroups (1–≤4) as well as in polymetastatic disease (≥6). The safety profile of ENZA + ADT versus PBO + ADT was similar across subgroups and consistent with previous findings. Conclusions: This post hoc analysis demonstrates that ENZA + ADT provides clinical benefit across bone oligometastatic as well as polymetastatic mHSPC, supporting the utility of ENZA irrespective of metastatic burden in the ARCHES study. Clinical trial information: NCT02677896. [Table: see text]

Prostate epithelial genes define therapy-relevant prostate cancer molecular subtype

Background and objectives Transcriptomic landscape of prostate cancer (PCa) shows multidimensional variability, potentially arising from the cell-of-origin, reflected in serum markers, and most importantly related to drug sensitivities. For example, Aggressive Variant Prostate Cancer (AVPC) presents low PSA per tumor burden, and characterized by de novo resistance to androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARIs). Understanding PCa transcriptomic complexity can provide biological insight and therapeutic guidance. However, unsupervised clustering analysis is hindered by potential confounding factors such as stromal contamination and stress-related material degradation. Materials and methods To focus on prostate epithelial cell-relevant heterogeneity, we defined 1,629 genes expressed by prostate epithelial cells by analyzing publicly available bulk and single- cell RNA sequencing data. Consensus clustering and CIBERSORT deconvolution were used for class discovery and proportion estimate analysis. The Cancer Genome Atlas Prostate Adenocarcinoma dataset served as a training set. The resulting clusters were analyzed in association with clinical, pathologic, and genomic characteristics and impact on survival. Serum markers PSA and PAP was analyzed to predict response to docetaxel chemotherapy in metastatic setting. Results We identified two luminal subtypes and two aggressive variant subtypes of PCa: luminal A (Adipogenic/AR-active/PSA-high) (30.0%); luminal S (Secretory/PAP-high) (26.0%); AVPC-I (Immune-infiltrative) (14.7%), AVPC-M (Myc-active) (4.2%), and mixed (25.0%). AVPC-I and AVPC-M subtypes predicted to be resistant to ARI and have low PSA per tumor burden. Luminal A and AVPC-M predicted to be resistant to docetaxel and have high PSA/PAP Ratio. Metastatic PCa patients with high PSA/PAP ratio (>20) had significantly shorter progression-free survival than those with low ratio (≤20) following docetaxel chemotherapy. Conclusion We propose four prostate adenocarcinoma subtypes with distinct transcriptomic, genomic, and pathologic characteristics. PSA/PAP ratio in advanced cancer may aid in determining which patients would benefit from maximized androgen receptor inhibition or early use of antimicrotubule agents.