scholarly journals A rapidly progressing wound, a mistaken identity

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-74
Author(s):  
Shahrul Hisham Sulaiman ◽  
Nur Ashikin Ahmad
Keyword(s):  
Mistaken Identity

A case of mistaken identity

1991 ◽  
Vol 36 (11) ◽  
pp. 1017-1017
Author(s):  
William Gardner
Keyword(s):  
Mistaken Identity

North Korea and the Opinion of Fascism: A Case of Mistaken Identity

2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alzo David-West
Keyword(s):  
North Korea ◽  
Mistaken Identity

scholarly journals Banach’s Doctorate: A Case of Mistaken Identity

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danuta Ciesielska ◽  
Krzysztof Ciesielski
Keyword(s):  
Mistaken Identity

Sheep in wolf's clothing: A case of mistaken identity—Intestinal mesenteritis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Advait Pandya ◽  
Krishna Kotecha ◽  
Edward Li ◽  
Anthony J. Gill ◽  
Jaswinder S. Samra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mistaken Identity

The Man in the Background: The Search for Maecenas

Antichthon ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 54-79
Author(s):  
Ronald T. Ridley
Keyword(s):  
Sixteenth Century ◽  
Current Understanding ◽  
List Type ◽  
Type Number ◽  
Large Role ◽  
Mistaken Identity ◽  
Augustan Era ◽  
Ara Pacis ◽  
Made In

AbstractSince the late sixteenth century parts of the ‘imperial frieze’ of the Ara Pacis have been known. The most striking figure in the background of the southern frieze is that long thought to be a portrait of Maecenas, the Etruscan prince and literary patron of the Augustan era. This article attempts three things: to discover 1.Where and how this identification originated,2.What evidence there now is for that identification, and3.What alternative identifications can be offered.The bibliography is substantial, the trail is complicated and highly paradoxical, and fantasy has often played a large role. The ‘evidence’ in play for centuries has sometimes evaporated into thin air. The identities proposed are, in fact, numerous. Not of least interest is the hidden or mistaken identity, in turn, of crucial modern scholars. A method is proposed at last for evaluating the identifications of this background portrait, including obvious comparison with other background figures. This analysis emphasizes how much is still not known about the most famous piece of Augustan art. An attempt is nevertheless made in the last analysis, to support what can be offered, in the light of current understanding, as the most plausible identification.

Operating system framed in case of mistaken identity

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristian Bravo-Lillo ◽  
Lorrie Cranor ◽  
Julie Downs ◽  
Saranga Komanduri ◽  
Stuart Schechter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Operating System ◽  
Mistaken Identity

Malignant Melanoma: a Case of Mistaken Identity—Case Report

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rong R. Khaw ◽  
Kashif Jamil ◽  
Ramy Aly ◽  
Anca N. Breahna
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Malignant Melanoma ◽  
Mistaken Identity

A case of mistaken identity

1983 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 52-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.G. Cogger
Keyword(s):  
Mistaken Identity

Immunostaining of small-cell carcinoma: mistaken identity?

The Lancet ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 362 (9395) ◽  
pp. 1583
Author(s):  
Roland Schmitt ◽  
Wilko Weichert
Keyword(s):  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Small Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Mistaken Identity

Anonymous Works and Their Ascription to Famous Authors: Are They Cases of Mistaken Identity of an Outright Forgery?

Arabica ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 62 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 404-410
Author(s):  
Ismail K. Poonawala
Keyword(s):  
Middle Ages ◽  
Very Old ◽  
Mistaken Identity ◽  
Islamic Tradition ◽  
The Middle Ages

The false attribution of anonymous works to famous authors is not unique to Islamic tradition in general and to Ismāʿīlī tradition in particular. Rather it is a very old problem dating back to ancient Greeks. The students of philosophy are familiar with this question as a number of spurious books circulated in the Middle Ages known as “pseudo-Aristotelian” or “pseudo-Ammonius.” However, the scholars have succeeded to disentangle the genuine from the counterfeit by using various critical tools at their disposal. In what follows I have tried to demonstrate that both Minhāǧ al-farāʾiḍ and Kitāb al-Yanābīʿ are falsely ascribed to the famous Ismāʿīlī law giver al-Qāḍī l-Nuʿmān. Any scholar who is fully familiar with the whole corpus of al-Nuʿmān’s works, especially with his numerous works on jurisprudence, would reject Cilardo’s claim to the contrary.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document