Satisfaction, quality of life and perception of patients regarding burdens and benefits of vitamin K antagonists compared with direct oral anticoagulants in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. ALADIN Study.

Vitamin K antagonists (eg, warfarin) have been the standard of care for stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation. The direct oral anticoagulants dabigatran (direct thrombin inhibitor) and rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban (direct factor Xa inhibitors) are as efficacious as and in some instances superior to vitamin K antagonists in the prevention of stroke, systemic embolism, and major bleeding compared with warfarin for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Benefits of direct oral anticoagulants include a rapid onset of therapeutic effect, fixed dose-response relationships without the need for routine monitoring, a short half-life, and infrequent need for periprocedural bridging with a parenteral agent. However, direct oral anticoagulants differ in subsets of patients. Critical care and advanced practice nurses must understand these differences, prescribing considerations, drug aherence interventions, drug-drug interactions, and periprocedural management. This article presents an update and review of direct oral antigcoagulants based on the latest national guidelines.

Download Full-text

EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF DIRECT ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS VERSUS VITAMIN K ANTAGONISTS IN PATIENTS WITH ATRIAL FIBRILLATION AND BIOPROSTHETIC VALVES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Journal of the American College of Cardiology ◽

10.1016/s0735-1097(21)03083-7 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 77 (18) ◽

pp. 1727

Author(s):

Neha Patel ◽

Ahmed Elzanaty ◽

Mitra Patel ◽

Eman Elsheikh

Keyword(s):

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Systematic Review ◽

Vitamin K ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Vitamin K Antagonists ◽

Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Bioprosthetic Valves

Download Full-text

Direct Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Patients Aged 80 Years or Older With Atrial Fibrillation in a “Real-world” Nationwide Registry: Insights From the FANTASIIA Study

Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics ◽

10.1177/1074248420916316 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 25 (4) ◽

pp. 316-323

Author(s):

Martín Ruiz Ortiz ◽

Javier Muñiz ◽

María Asunción Esteve-Pastor ◽

Francisco Marín ◽

Inmaculada Roldán ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Vitamin K ◽

Real World ◽

Vitamin K Antagonists ◽

Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Left Ventricular ◽

Anticoagulant Treatment ◽

Cancer History

Objective: To describe major events at follow up in octogenarian patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) according to anticoagulant treatment: direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Methods: A total of 578 anticoagulated patients aged ≥80 years with AF were included in a prospective, observational, multicenter study. Basal features, embolic events (stroke and systemic embolism), severe bleedings, and all-cause mortality at follow up were investigated according to the anticoagulant treatment received. Results: Mean age was 84.0 ± 3.4 years, 56% were women. Direct oral anticoagulants were prescribed to 123 (21.3%) patients. Compared with 455 (78.7%) patients treated with VKAs, those treated with DOACs presented a lower frequency of permanent AF (52.9% vs 61.6%, P = .01), cancer history (4.9% vs 10.9%, P = .046), renal failure (21.1% vs 32.2%, P = .02), and left ventricular dysfunction (2.4% vs 8.0%, P = .03); and higher frequency of previous stroke (26.0% vs 16.6%, P = .02) and previous major bleeding (8.1% vs 3.6%, P = .03). There were no significant differences in Charlson, CHA2DS2VASc, nor HAS-BLED scores. At 3-year follow up, rates of embolic events, severe bleedings, and all-cause death (per 100 patients-year) were similar in both groups (DOACs vs VKAs): 0.34 vs 1.35 ( P = .15), 3.45 vs 4.41 ( P = .48), and 8.2 vs 11.0 ( P = .18), respectively, without significant differences after multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.25, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.03-1.93, P = .19; HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.44-1.76, P = .72 and HR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.53-1.33, P = .46, respectively). Conclusion: In this “real-world” registry, the differences in major events rates in octogenarians with AF were not statistically significant in those treated with DOACs versus VKAs.

Download Full-text

Optimal Anticoagulation Strategy for Cardioversion in Atrial Fibrillation

Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review ◽

10.15420/aer.2015.4.1.44 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 4 (1) ◽

pp. 44 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Philipp Bushoven ◽

Sven Linzbach ◽

Mate Vamos ◽

Stefan H Hohnloser ◽

◽

...

Keyword(s):

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Vitamin K ◽

Stroke Prevention ◽

Vitamin K Antagonists ◽

Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Prospective Trial ◽

Bleeding Complications ◽

Order Of Magnitude ◽

Pharmacological Cardioversion

For many patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation, cardioversion is performed to restore sinus rhythm and relieve symptoms. Cardioversion carries a distinct risk for thromboembolism which has been described to be in the order of magnitude of 1 to 3 %. For almost five decades, vitamin K antagonist therapy has been the mainstay of therapy to prevent thromboembolism around the time of cardioversion although not a single prospective trial has formally established its efficacy and safety. Currently, three new direct oral anticoagulants are approved for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. For all three, there are data regarding its usefulness during the time of electrical or pharmacological cardioversion. Due to the ease of handling, their efficacy regarding stroke prevention, and their safety with respect to bleeding complications, the new direct oral anticoagulants are endorsed as the preferred therapy over vitamin K antagonists for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation including the clinical setting of elective cardioversion.

Download Full-text