scholarly journals Third Party Funding for Litigation in Dispute Resolution Mechanism and its Recent Developments in International Commercial Arbitration

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 1153-1164
Author(s):  
Seemasmiti Pattjoshi et al., Seemasmiti Pattjoshi et al., ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Commercial Arbitration ◽  
International Commercial Arbitration ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
Dispute Resolution Mechanism ◽  
Party Funding

scholarly journals Critical Appraisal of Third Party Funding in India

2021 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 3462-3467
Author(s):  
Ms. Seemasmiti Pattjoshi, Dr. Puranjoy Ghosh
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Critical Appraisal ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
Commercial Arbitration ◽  
Present Discussion ◽  
International Commercial Arbitration ◽  
The World ◽  
Substantive Justice ◽  
Party Funding

Third-party funding in International Commercial Arbitration is one of the most contemporaneous and controversial issue in the normative framework in India. The last several years have witnessed increasing involvement of Third Party Funders in International Commercial Arbitration proceedings. Third-party funding has been considered as one of the means of access to justice for those who have a credible claim but no financial means to pursue it.  Dispute resolution in India tends to be a cost-heavy proposition for the parties involved. The present discussion highlights critical appraisal regarding TPF (Third Party Funding) from the delivery of procedural and substantive justice as well as suggesting legal and jurisprudential grounds in third party funding governance all across the world.

scholarly journals International Commercial Arbitration Put to the Test in the Commonwealth

2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 357
Author(s):  
Petra Butler
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Commercial Arbitration ◽  
International Commercial Arbitration ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
Border Trade ◽  
Dispute Resolution Mechanism ◽  
Rare Opportunity

The article discusses the Commonwealth Study on international commercial arbitration conducted in 2019. The importance of the availability of international commercial arbitration as a dispute resolution mechanism lies in the link between trade and the accessibility of a dispute resolution mechanism that reflects the needs of cross-border trade. Given that the Commonwealth has a unique legal and trade ecosystem the Study provides a rare opportunity to consider what a best practice modern international commercial arbitration framework should look like to encourage cross-border trade.

Delays Expected but Duration of Delays Unpredictable: Causes, Types, and Symptoms of Procedural Applications in Investment Arbitration

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julien Chaisse
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Empirical Analysis ◽  
International Investment ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Common Phenomenon ◽  
Investment Arbitration ◽  
Party Funding

Abstract Delays are becoming a common phenomenon in international investment arbitration and challenging the conventional belief that it is a time-effective mode of dispute resolution. These delays, majorly stemming from interim procedural applications, are known to arise due to the different interests and types of stakeholders involved in the process. This article provides an empirical analysis of such arbitration proceedings to cull out the types, nature, and effects of delay tactics in such proceedings. This article identifies three types of applications that play an increasing role in investment arbitration, namely, applications for ‘security for costs’, applications for disclosure of third-party funding, and the objections of manifest lack of legal merit of claims. Such delays can particularly become a cause of concern for investment arbitration as they have impacts beyond those which are on the parties involved.

Emergency Arbitrator: Indian Prospects

LAW REVIEW ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dr. Ashish Kumar Srivastava
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Real Problem ◽  
Anglo Saxon ◽  
Commercial Arbitration ◽  
International Commercial Arbitration ◽  
National Courts ◽  
High Courts ◽  
Interim Measures ◽  
Indian Perspective

International commercial arbitration is one of the most favourite mode of dispute resolution in world for resolving commercial disputes. Speed and cost are two important features what makes arbitrationa sought-after mode for dispute resolution because in conventional dispute resolution by courts ‘Remedy becomes worse than malady’ due to delay and cost. Legalism and authoritative courts in Anglo Saxon societies make the justice dilatory and expensive which is termed analogically as a disease of ‘Adversariasis’. Judicial minimalism is encouraged by entrepreneurs and business class of world which results in enhanced thrust on international commercial arbitration. In any arbitration interim measures are sine quo non. The irreparable loss and balance of convenience demands intervention by authoritative body to order and issue processes which can binds parties and third parties. In such cases unless interim measures are sought by municipal national courts no effective and binding interim remedies can be granted to the parties and third parties. The arbitrator once appointed is competent enough to grant interim measures and it can also decide about its jurisdiction based on doctrine of Kompetenz-Kompetenz. However, if before the appointment of arbitrator, the need of urgent interim measures arises then obviously parties have to go to the municipal national courts but this judicial intervention is not the intent of parties as they are seeking judicial minimalism. In such situations the urgent interim measures can be granted by emergency arbitrator. The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is silent about emergency arbitrator but Delhi and Bombay High Courts have given some pragmatic judgments, making the provision of emergency arbitrator, a reality. The real problem in emergency arbitrator is how one can grant interim relief even without being in existence i.e. when arbitrator itself is non est. ICC, SIAC and LCIA provide for emergency arbitrator. In this paper the author has tried to make an analytical and comparative overview of emergency arbitrator in Indian Perspective.

Part III Arbitral Rules, 16 Rules of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baumann Antje
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Arbitral Tribunal ◽  
Commercial Arbitration ◽  
International Commercial Arbitration ◽  
Time Limits ◽  
Chamber Of Commerce ◽  
International Court ◽  
Arbitral Proceedings ◽  
Number Of Parties ◽  
International Chamber Of Commerce

This chapter discusses the arbitration rules of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC). It begins with a background on the ICC International Court of Arbitration, with emphasis on its role in the development of international commercial arbitration. It then examines the 2017 ICC Arbitration Rules, citing some relevant figures related to ICC arbitration for the year 2017, including the number of parties involved in cases, the arbitral tribunals, and awards rendered by arbitral tribunals. Figures on other ICC dispute resolution rules are also given. The chapter concludes with a commentary of Articles 1–42 of the ICC Arbitration Rules, which cover topics such as definitions; time limits for written notifications or communications; request for arbitration and the respondent’s counterclaims to such a request; effect of the arbitration agreement; constitution of the arbitral tribunal; appointment, confirmation, challenge, and replacement of arbitrators; and rules of law applicable to the arbitral proceedings.

Arbitration from a Law & Economics Perspective

2020 ◽  
pp. 873-894
Author(s):  
Anne van Aaken ◽  
Tomer Broude
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Cognitive Abilities ◽  
Supply And Demand ◽  
The Other ◽  
Third Party ◽  
International Arbitration ◽  
General Welfare ◽  
Welfare Consequences ◽  
Party Funding

This chapter offers a Law & Economics (L&E) perspective on international arbitration. L&E scholars tend to view dispute resolution as a market. They thus look at the supply and demand of such third-party adjudication, usually comparing litigation to arbitration. Predominantly, in the literature, there are two interrelated L&E perspectives on this: one is focused on the general welfare consequences of arbitration; the other is focused on why disputants choose one kind of third-party settlement over another. There are many ways of resolving disputes between contractual parties: arbitration is also in competition with mediation, conciliation, litigation, and other forms of resolving disputes, including so-called ‘extra-legal’, socially normative ones. Most literature has focused either on the choice between litigation and arbitration or on the influence of arbitration on negotiation and settlement between the parties. The chapter then addresses other disputant choices relating to third-party funding and arbitrator appointment. It also looks at the incentives and behaviour of arbitrators, including their cognitive abilities.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document