scholarly journals A comparision of 3-dimensional and standard miniplates fixation in the management of mandibular fractures

2017 ◽  
Vol 08 (05) ◽  
pp. 16839-16843
Author(s):  
Balakrishna Manohar CH ◽  
◽  
Mastan Shaik ◽  
Vamsi Krishna Reddy.D ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mandibular Fractures ◽  
3 Dimensional

scholarly journals Comparison of Bite Force in Patients After Treatment of Mandibular Fractures With 3-Dimensional Locking Miniplate and Standard Miniplates

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-10
Author(s):  
Gaurav Singh ◽  
Madan Mishra ◽  
Amit Gaur ◽  
Dhritiman Pathak
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Bite Force ◽  
Mandibular Fractures ◽  
Time Intervals ◽  
Experimental Conditions ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Drilling Conditions ◽  
Group 1

Background: Fractures of the mandible can be studied and described in anatomic terms, functional considerations, treatment strategies, and outcome measures. The performance of any fixation system depends on multiple factors including plate adaptation, screw placement, bone quality, drilling conditions, and postoperative patient compliance. Bite force assesses masticatory muscle function under clinical and experimental conditions. Method: 30 patients with isolated, noncomminuted mandibular fractures were randomly divided into two equal groups. Group 1 patients were treated using 3-dimensional locking miniplates and group 2 patients were treated with standard miniplates. The bite forces were recorded at definite time intervals: preoperatively, and second week, sixth week, third month, and sixth month postoperatively. Result: At 6 weeks postoperative, 3 month postoperative, and 6 month postoperative, the mean bite force was found to be significantly higher among group 1 patients as compared to those in group 2 in all the sites. While at 2 week postoperative, the mean bite force was found to be significantly higher in Group 2 as compared to Group 1 at incisor region. Conclusion: The overall results of the present study show better performance in bite force for the 3-dimensional locking miniplate when compared with standard miniplates.

Comparison of 3-Dimensional and Standard Miniplate Fixation in the Management of Mandibular Fractures

2010 ◽  
Vol 68 (7) ◽  
pp. 1568-1572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manoj Kumar Jain ◽  
K.S. Manjunath ◽  
B.K. Bhagwan ◽  
Dipit K. Shah
Keyword(s):  
Mandibular Fractures ◽  
3 Dimensional

scholarly journals 3-Dimensional Plates Versus Conventional Mini plates in Maxillofacial Trauma- A Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (SPL4) ◽  
pp. 1222-1225
Author(s):  
Subhashini Ramasubbu ◽  
Shivangi Gaur ◽  
Ramvihari Thota ◽  
Abdul Wahab P U
Keyword(s):  
Bone Fractures ◽  
Soft Tissue Injury ◽  
Nasal Bone ◽  
Maxillofacial Trauma ◽  
Mandibular Fractures ◽  
Facial Bone ◽  
Facial Bones ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
Maxillomandibular Fixation ◽  
Wire Osteosynthesis

Maxillofacial trauma is any physical injury to the facial bones. Facial bones are frequently fractured bones in RTA, Assault, Domestic violence etc. Facial trauma includes Maxillary fractures, Mandibular fractures, Orbital Fractures, Nasal Bone Fractures, soft tissue injury such as lacerations, bruises etc. Over the years, there are many refinements in the management of maxillofacial trauma. The incidence of maxillofacial trauma is more in males because they are involved in more physical activities and assault compared to women. In Older times for facial bone fractures, surgeons performed maxillomandibular fixation using wire osteosynthesis for minimum three weeks to 6 weeks, and mouth opening was difficult, poor oral hygiene leading to periodontal problems, difficulty in speech and masticatory functions. The management of maxillofacial trauma includes the use of Maxillomandibular fixation using wire osteosynthesis, conventional mini plates and 3-D plates. For the management of facial bone fractures, Maxillofacial surgeons perform open reduction and internal fixation(ORIF) whenever needed. In the case of ORIF, Surgeons use mini plates either 3D or Conventional Plates for stabilising the fractured segments. This technique requires skill and experience and is also expensive. The advantages of this method are improved quality of life. The objective of this review is to compare 3-Dimensional plates and Conventional Plates in Maxillofacial trauma.

Mandibular Fractures: Diagnosis and Management

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kanvar Panesar ◽  
Srinivas M. Susarla
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Fixation ◽  
Intraoperative Imaging ◽  
Surgical Anatomy ◽  
Mandibular Fractures ◽  
Non Union ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
Diagnosis And Management ◽  
Facial Esthetics ◽  
And Function ◽  
Fixation Principles

AbstractAccurate evaluation, diagnosis, and management of mandibular fractures is essential to effectively restore an individual's facial esthetics and function. Understanding of surgical anatomy, fracture fixation principles, and the nuances of specific fractures with respect to various patient populations can aid in adequately avoiding complications such as malocclusion, non-union, paresthesia, and revision procedures. This article reviews comprehensive mandibular fracture assessment, mandibular surgical anatomy, fracture fixation principles, management considerations, and commonly encountered complications. In addition, this article reviews emerging literature examining 3-dimensional printing and intraoperative imaging.

scholarly journals Comparative Study of 3 Dimensional and Standard Miniplate in Management of Anterior Mandibular Fractures

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Revati Singh ◽  
Ajoy Kumar Shahi ◽  
V.K. Prajapati ◽  
Swati Sharma ◽  
Subhash Chandra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Mandibular Fractures ◽  
3 Dimensional

scholarly journals Clinical Analysis and CT 3D-Mediated Precise Internal Fixation in Maxillofacial Fracture

2019 ◽  
pp. 014556131988211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zainure Wubulihasimu ◽  
Meiheriban Tuerhong ◽  
Zhifei Zhang ◽  
Huilin Li ◽  
Nurahmat Kadir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Clinical Analysis ◽  
Zygomatic Arch ◽  
Mandibular Fractures ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
Epidemiological Features ◽  
Maxillofacial Fractures ◽  
Optimized Treatment

Background/Purpose: To retrospectively analyze the epidemiological features, clinical diagnosis, and treatment of 610 patients with maxillofacial fractures, while providing a reference for the prevention and optimized treatment of maxillofacial fractures. Methods: Data of patients with maxillofacial fractures who were treated and followed up at the Second People’s Hospital of Kashi Prefecture from June 2012 to April 2018 were summarized. The epidemiological features, clinical manifestations, fracture sites, treatment methods, and results were analyzed. Results: The highest incidence was in the age range of 20 to 49 years. The main cause of fracture was traffic injury. Mandibular fractures accounted for 37.77%, zygoma and zygomatic arch fractures for 37.00%, and maxillary fractures for 21.19%. Atypical zygomatic arch fractures were more common in the maxilla, followed by Le Fort I and II fractures. Closed fractures accounted for 85.97%. Many (73.39%) patients were treated with computed tomography 3-dimensional (3D)-mediated precision modified incision internal fixation with satisfactory results. Conclusions: There is a high incidence of maxillofacial fractures among young men, especially in summer, with the most common injuries being traffic-related injuries. The most common site is the mandible, followed by the zygomatic arch, zygomatic complex, and maxilla. Computed tomography 3D-mediated precision modified incision internal fixation can achieve satisfactory results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document