Serial Learning of Heterogeneous Items in Ordered and Unordered Sequences

1975 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-11
Author(s):  
E. Rae Harcum

The present study tests the acquisition-strategy hypothesis of serial learning, which attributes the serial-position effect to consistent orders of item acquisition among individual Ss, and over-all learning difficulty in part to the ease of establishing an order of acquisition. As predicted, lists of CVC trigrams which were organized in terms of associative values to facilitate a temporal beginning-to-end strategy of acquisition were learned faster than unorganized lists or lists organized from end to beginning. Also as predicted, an unorganized array of heterogeneous trigrams produced more errors and less regularity of the serial-position curves than a homogeneous series. Results thus supported the strategy hypothesis of serial learning.

1972 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 340-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey Underwood

To determine the influence of response organization factors in selective attention, a comparison was made between the shadowing and monitoring techniques of attention control and a one-trial serial recall technique in which subjects were instructed to remember one message (attended channel) of a dichotic presentation. Detections of semantic targets in the attended and unattended messages from the remembering condition were quantitatively similar to those from the monitoring condition. This suggests that the low detection rates in the unattended message when subjects are shadowing are a function of the higher processing demands of overt response organization required by this task. A serial position effect was also in evidence: the detection probability was enhanced if the target was positioned towards either end of the serial presentation of 16 items. The primacy observed here, common to all three attention control conditions, indicates more efficient perceptual processing and subsequent categorizing of end items than of central, embedded items. The hypothesis is offered that the principles governing the present primacy effects may also underlie primacy in serial position curves of short-term memory studies.


1962 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 307-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
EDWARD A. FEIGENBAUM ◽  
HERBERT A. SIMON

2004 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 465-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew R. Powell ◽  
Jeffrey D. Gfeller ◽  
Michael V. Oliveri ◽  
Shannon Stanton ◽  
Bryan Hendricks

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document