Effects of prior serial learning of solution words upon anagram problem solving: A serial position effect.

1968 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary A. Davis ◽  
Mary E. Manske
1970 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-142
Author(s):  
Charles J. Gadway

Since the serial-position effect has been demonstrated to diminish as learning progresses, it was hypothesized that only a weak recency serial-position effect would result from demand recall of concepts in a complex problem-solving situation. Six groups of 14 Ss solved 15 problems, 5 soluble by each of 3 concepts (rules), recalled from prior instruction. Each group received a different permutation of the 3 concepts. The serial-position effect appeared to be minimal for demand recall of concepts with the predicted weak recency effect (.01 < p < .05) but no primacy effect.


1975 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-11
Author(s):  
E. Rae Harcum

The present study tests the acquisition-strategy hypothesis of serial learning, which attributes the serial-position effect to consistent orders of item acquisition among individual Ss, and over-all learning difficulty in part to the ease of establishing an order of acquisition. As predicted, lists of CVC trigrams which were organized in terms of associative values to facilitate a temporal beginning-to-end strategy of acquisition were learned faster than unorganized lists or lists organized from end to beginning. Also as predicted, an unorganized array of heterogeneous trigrams produced more errors and less regularity of the serial-position curves than a homogeneous series. Results thus supported the strategy hypothesis of serial learning.


1962 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 307-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
EDWARD A. FEIGENBAUM ◽  
HERBERT A. SIMON

2004 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 465-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew R. Powell ◽  
Jeffrey D. Gfeller ◽  
Michael V. Oliveri ◽  
Shannon Stanton ◽  
Bryan Hendricks

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document