Selection of Consequences: Adaptive Behavior from Random Reinforcement

1985 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 379-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Marken

The behavior of subjects in a human operant conditioning experiment was “shaped” using a random reinforcement contingency. Bar-press responses kept a moving cursor near a target although the consequence of each response was a random change in the direction of the cursor. The apparent effect of reinforcement on behavior is shown to be an illusion created by ignoring the consistency of behavioral results.

2017 ◽  
pp. 362-363
Author(s):  
A. Obrist Paul ◽  
Jasper Brener A.H. Black ◽  
DiCara Leo V.

1989 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard L. Shull ◽  
P. Scott Lawrence ◽  
Mary E. Tota ◽  
Jennifer A. Sharp ◽  
Mark A. Drusdow ◽  
...  

1962 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 329-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon L. Paul ◽  
Charles W. Eriksen ◽  
Lloyd G. Humphreys

1976 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth B. Koffer ◽  
Grant Coulson ◽  
Leslie Hammond

During discussion of a variety of topics by 2 undergraduates a target response, 1 of 3 affirmatives, was reinforced by one of the discussants by delivery of a nickel. Although nickel delivery increased the frequency of the target response, neither of the 2 subjects could describe the reinforcement contingency until the end of the third session. It was concluded that operant conditioning without awareness occurred even when the response was reinforced by the highly discriminable event of delivery of a nickel.


1963 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 155-157
Author(s):  
James R. Morris ◽  
John E. Hannon ◽  
Michael Dinoff

Six chronic, regressed schizophrenic Ss who had been identified as “poor” generalizers in an earlier operant conditioning experiment designed to foster interaction behavior, e.g., other-oriented speech, were Ss. By partially reinstating the cues from the original operant conditioning situation, generalization of interaction behavior appeared in five of the six Ss.


1968 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 371-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert F. McClure

Operant conditioning techniques were used to study talking behavior of retarded peers. A design using concurrent verbal and nonverbal operants was devised to test several hypotheses. Verbal social responding increased in a group with contingent reinforcement and verbal instructions about the reinforcement contingency but not in groups with either condition alone.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document