scholarly journals Geological CO2 Storage by Underground Coal Gasification

2010 ◽  
Vol 126 (10/11) ◽  
pp. 602-607 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sohei SHIMADA ◽  
Hitoshi KOIDE ◽  
Ken-ichi YAMAZAKI
2013 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. 428-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasilis Sarhosis ◽  
Dongmin Yang ◽  
Yong Sheng ◽  
Thomas Kempka

2013 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. 212-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie Nakaten ◽  
Philipp Kötting ◽  
Rafig Azzam ◽  
Thomas Kempka

DYNA ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 87 (215) ◽  
pp. 34-38
Author(s):  
Vidal Félix Navarro Torres

In this study, an innovative numerical model was developed to quantify the environmental sustainability situation of in situ underground coal gasification (UCG) and the CO2 storage process, which is expressed in terms of the environmental sustainability index (ESI). This approach is based on four environmental indicators: rock and soil, groundwater, surface water, and atmosphere. Based on the ESI values, the methodology proposed herein is used to classify the environmental sustainability state of the UCG process and its corresponding threshold limit value. Finally, the developed mathematical model was applied to possible European coal deposits, specifically in a Bulgarian coal basin. Research efforts have focused on the development of a mathematical model for environmental impact assessments to pave the way for full-scale trial and commercial applications.


2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dipankar Chatterjee ◽  
◽  
Satish Gupta ◽  
Chebolu Aravind ◽  
Rakesh Roshan

Author(s):  
Marian Wiatowski ◽  
Roksana Muzyka ◽  
Krzysztof Kapusta ◽  
Maciej Chrubasik

AbstractIn this study, the composition of tars collected during a six-day underground coal gasification (UCG) test at the experimental mine ‘Barbara’ in Poland in 2013 was examined. During the test, tar samples were taken every day from the liquid product separator and analysed by the methods used for testing properties of typical coke oven (coal) tar. The obtained results were compared with each other and with the data for coal tar. As gasification progressed, a decreasing trend in the water content and an increasing trend in the ash content were observed. The tars tested were characterized by large changes in the residue after coking and content of parts insoluble in toluene and by smaller fluctuations in the content of parts insoluble in quinoline. All tested samples were characterized by very high distillation losses, while for samples starting from the third day of gasification, a clear decrease in losses was visible. A chromatographic analysis showed that there were no major differences in composition between the tested tars and that none of the tar had a dominant component such as naphthalene in coal tar. The content of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in UCG tars is several times lower than that in coal tar. No light monoaromatic hydrocarbons (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes—BTEX) were found in the analysed tars, which results from the fact that these compounds, due to their high volatility, did not separate from the process gas in the liquid product separator.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document