scholarly journals Underground Coal Gasification and CO2 Storage Support Bulgaria's Low Carbon Energy Supply

2013 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. 212-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie Nakaten ◽  
Philipp Kötting ◽  
Rafig Azzam ◽  
Thomas Kempka
Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (13) ◽  
pp. 3718
Author(s):  
Stefan Zelenak ◽  
Erika Skvarekova ◽  
Andrea Senova ◽  
Gabriel Wittenberger

Countries of the European Union have stated transition to carbon-neutral economy until the year of 2050. Countries with a higher share of coal-fired power generation currently have no solution to end their combustion and use clean, emission-free energy immediately. The solution to this problem in the energy industry appears to be the increased use of natural gas, which significantly reduces CO2 emissions. In this article, we investigated the possibility of using coal in situ, using UCG (underground coal gasification) technology. We focused on verified geological, hydrogeological, and tectonic information about the selected brown coal deposit in Slovakia. This information has been assessed in research projects in recent years at the Technical University. From the abovementioned information, possible adverse factors were evaluated. These factors affect the rock environment around the underground generator by UCG activity. As part of the process management, measures were proposed to eliminate the occurrence of pollution and adverse effects on the environment. In the final phase of the UCG technology, we proposed to carry out, in the boreholes and in the generator cavity, water flushing and subsequent grouting. The proposed are suitable materials for solidification and stabilization. Results of this article´s solutions are crucial in the case of usage of this so-called clean technology, not only in Slovakia but also worldwide.


2013 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. 428-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasilis Sarhosis ◽  
Dongmin Yang ◽  
Yong Sheng ◽  
Thomas Kempka

Energy Policy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 128 ◽  
pp. 830-837 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.R. Bohlmann ◽  
J.M. Horridge ◽  
R. Inglesi-Lotz ◽  
E.L. Roos ◽  
L. Stander

2014 ◽  
Vol 61 ◽  
pp. 74-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Till Jenssen ◽  
Andreas König ◽  
Ludger Eltrop

DYNA ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 87 (215) ◽  
pp. 34-38
Author(s):  
Vidal Félix Navarro Torres

In this study, an innovative numerical model was developed to quantify the environmental sustainability situation of in situ underground coal gasification (UCG) and the CO2 storage process, which is expressed in terms of the environmental sustainability index (ESI). This approach is based on four environmental indicators: rock and soil, groundwater, surface water, and atmosphere. Based on the ESI values, the methodology proposed herein is used to classify the environmental sustainability state of the UCG process and its corresponding threshold limit value. Finally, the developed mathematical model was applied to possible European coal deposits, specifically in a Bulgarian coal basin. Research efforts have focused on the development of a mathematical model for environmental impact assessments to pave the way for full-scale trial and commercial applications.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhavik Lodhia ◽  
Stuart Clark

Abstract Over the last decade, there has been an irreversible shift from hydrocarbon exploration towards carbon storage, low-carbon energy generation and hydrogen exploration. Whilst basin modelling techniques may be used to predict the migration of hydrocarbons through sedimentary basins on geological timescales, there remains little understanding of how fluids behave at the basin scale on present-day timescales. Maximum vertical fluid velocity, vmax, may be calculated as the product of mobility and buoyancy. We present am algorithm to determine the basin-scale mobilities of CO2 and methane with depth for sandstone and carbonate. CO2 and methane mobility and buoyancy increase by an order of magnitude at gas phase transitions and are significantly greater in sandstone than in carbonate. Critical properties of CO2 cause fluid mobility and buoyancy to be sensitive to changes in surface temperature. vmax for CO2 and methane are on scales of m/year. Our results indicate an optimal depth for CO2 storage of below 0.59 km and 1.24 km when surface temperature > 20oC and 0oC, respectively. vmax for hydrogen is approximately 2-10 times greater than other hydrocarbon fluids and this will have important consequences for the future use of basin modelling software for determining hydrogen migration for exploration and storage.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document