scholarly journals On the Factorization of Polynomials Over Discrete Valuation Domains

2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 273-280
Author(s):  
Doru Ştefănescu

AbstractWe study some factorization properties for univariate polynomials with coefficients in a discrete valuation domain (A,v). We use some properties of the Newton index of a polynomial to deduce conditions on v(ai) that allow us to find some information on the degree of the factors of F.

2003 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 439-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pudji Astuti ◽  
Harald K. Wimmer

A submodule W of a torsion module M over a discrete valuation domain is called stacked in M if there exists a basis ℬ of M such that multiples of elements of ℬ form a basis of W. We characterise those submodules which are stacked in a pure submodule of M.


Author(s):  
Hagen Knaf

A theorem of Lichtenbaum states, that every proper, regular curve [Formula: see text] over a discrete valuation domain [Formula: see text] is projective. This theorem is generalized to the case of an arbitrary valuation domain [Formula: see text] using the following notion of regularity for non-noetherian rings introduced by Bertin: the local ring [Formula: see text] of a point [Formula: see text] is called regular, if every finitely generated ideal [Formula: see text] has finite projective dimension. The generalization is a particular case of a projectivity criterion for proper, normal [Formula: see text]-curves: such a curve [Formula: see text] is projective if for every irreducible component [Formula: see text] of its closed fiber [Formula: see text] there exists a closed point [Formula: see text] of the generic fiber of [Formula: see text] such that the Zariski closure [Formula: see text] meets [Formula: see text] and meets [Formula: see text] in regular points only.


2006 ◽  
Vol 295 (1) ◽  
pp. 269-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Arnold ◽  
K.M. Rangswamy ◽  
Fred Richman

1978 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
David E. Dobbs

In [7], Hedstrom and Houston introduce a type of quasilocal integral domain, therein dubbed a pseudo-valuation domain (for short, a PVD), which possesses many of the ideal-theoretic properties of valuation domains. For the reader′s convenience and reference purposes, Proposition 2.1 lists some of the ideal-theoretic characterizations of PVD′s given in [7]. As the terminology suggests, any valuation domain is a PVD. Since valuation domains may be characterized as the quasilocal domains of weak global dimension at most 1, a homological study of PVD's seems appropriate. This note initiates such a study by establishing (see Theorem 2.3) that the only possible weak global dimensions of a PVD are 0, 1, 2 and ∞. One upshot (Corollary 3.4) is that a coherent PVD cannot have weak global dimension 2: hence, none of the domains of weak global dimension 2 which appear in [10, Section 5.5] can be a PVD.


2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Zanardo

AbstractLet R be a non-discrete Archimedean valuation domain, G an R-module, Φ ∈ EndR(G).We compute the algebraic entropy entv(Φ), when Φ is restricted to a cyclic trajectory in G. We derive a special case of the Addition Theorem for entv, that is proved directly, without using the deep results and the difficult techniques of the paper by Salce and Virili [8].


2002 ◽  
Vol 01 (04) ◽  
pp. 451-467 ◽  
Author(s):  
PAOLO ZANARDO

A commutative ring R is said to be almost perfect if R/I is perfect for every nonzero ideal I of R. We prove that an almost perfect local domain R is dominated by a unique archimedean valuation domain V of its field of quotients Q if and only if the integral closure of R contains an ideal of V. We show how to construct almost perfect local domains dominated by finitely many archimedean valuation domains. We provide several examples illustrating various possible situations. In particular, we construct an almost perfect local domain whose maximal ideal is not almost nilpotent.


1991 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Fuchs ◽  
E. Monari-Martinez

Let R be a commutative domain with 1, Q its field of quotients, and M a torsion-free R module. By a balanced submodule of M is meant an RD-submodule N [i.e. rN = N ∩ rM for each r ∈ R] such that, for every R-submodule J of Q, every homomorphism η : J → M/N can be lifted to a homomorphism χ:J → M. This definition extends the notion of balancedness as introduced in abelian groups (see e.g. [10, p. 113]). The balanced-projective R-modules can be characterized as summands of completely decomposable R-modules (i.e. summands of direct sums of submodules of Q). If R is a valuation domain, then such summands are again completely decomposable; see [12, p. 275].


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document