scholarly journals Chromosome Numbers in Hieracium and Pilosella (Asteraceae) From Central and Southeastern Europe

Author(s):  
Tomasz Ilnicki ◽  
Zbigniew Szeląg
2017 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-87
Author(s):  
Krystyna Musiał ◽  
Agnieszka Janas ◽  
Zbigniew Szeląg

AbstractChromosome numbers for 13 species of Hieracium L. s.str. from Bulgaria, Macedonia, Poland and Romania are given and their metaphase plates are illustrated. Chromosome numbers are published for the first time for H. djimilense s.lat. 2n=3x=27, H. fiekii R. Uechtr. 2n=3x=27, H. glabrescens (F. W. Schultz) Murr 2n=3x=27, H. juranomorphum Zahn 2n=3x=27, H. sparsiflorum subsp. sparsiceps Zahn 2n=3x=27 and H. sparsum subsp. naegelianiforme Behr & Zahn 2n=3x=27.


2016 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-123
Author(s):  
Krystyna Musiał ◽  
Agnieszka Janas ◽  
Zbigniew Szeląg

Abstract Chromosome numbers for 12 Hieracium s.str. species from Bulgaria, Macedonia, Montenegro, Poland, Romania and Serbia are given and their metaphase plates are illustrated. Chromosome numbers are published for the first time for H. albinum Fries 2n=4x=36, H. bukovicae Rohlena & Zahn; 2n=3x=27, H. retyezatense subsp. subatratiforme Neičeff & Zahn 2n=4x=36, H. velenovskyi Freyn 2n=3x=27, as well as two undescribed species belonging to the H. bohatschianum agg. 2n=4x=36 and H. nigrescens agg. 2n=4x=36 and a hybrid between H. naegelianum Pančić and H. bifidum s.lat. 2n=4x=36.


2015 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krystyna Musiał ◽  
Zbigniew Szeląg

Abstract Chromosome numbers for 16 Hieracium s.str. species from Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Macedonia, Montenegro, Poland, Romania and Serbia are given and their metaphase plates are illustrated. Chromosome numbers are published for the first time for H. filarszkyi Jáv. & Zahn 2n = 3x = 27, H. fritschianum Hayek & Zahn 2n = 3x = 27, H. fritzeiforme Zahn 2n = 3x = 27, H. hercegovinicum (Freyn & Vandas) Szeląg 2n=3x=27, H. nivimontis (Oborny & Zahn) Chrtek fil. 2n = 4x = 36, H. vagneri Pax 2n = 4x = 36, as well as three undescribed species of hybrid origin between H. olympicum Boiss. and H. sparsum Friv. 2n = 4x = 36, H. naegelianum Panc. and H. scardicum Bornm. & Zahn 2n = 3x = 27, and H. transylvanicum Heuff. and H. umbellatum L. 2n = 4x = 36.


2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siegfried Gruber ◽  
Mikołaj Szołtysek

This article makes a new contribution to the discussion of historical European family forms. Its starting points are two recent contributions by Steven Ruggles in which the author discussed the historical appearances of stem and joint families across the globe. Drawing on most recent developments in census microdata infrastructure from historical Eastern, Central, and Southeastern Europe, the authors pinpoint limitations pertaining to the usage of IPUMS (Integrated Public Use Microdata Series) and NAPP (North Atlantic Population Project) collections for the investigation of European family systems. Using newly acquired materials and refined conceptual tools, they enhance the knowledge about the spatiotemporal distribution of stem- and joint-family arrangements in a broader European context. As the frequency of joint families in the regions under study cannot be fully accounted for by referring to measures of economic conditions and demographic structures alone, the authors speculate about some additional factors which may explain the observed differences in joint-family coresidence across historic Eastern Europe.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine Lebow ◽  
Małgorzata Mazurek ◽  
Joanna Wawrzyniak

The events of 1914 initiated the redrawing of many boundaries, both geopolitical and intellectual. At the outbreak of the war the London-based anthropologist Bronisław Malinowski was at a professional meeting in Australia. Technically an ‘enemy alien’ (a Pole of Austro-Hungarian citizenship), he was barred from returning to Britain; stranded in Australia, under surveillance by authorities and with insecure finances, Malinowski began fieldwork in the Trobriand Islands that would result in his groundbreakingArgonauts of the Western Pacific(1922).1Argonauts’ influence rested on its compelling portrait of the anthropologist as ‘participant-observer’, the insider/outsider uniquely poised to decode and recode cultures and meanings.2Malinowski thus adeptly retooled his own ambiguous status into a paradigm of the ethnographer’s optimal subject-position – quipping that he himself was particularly suited to this role, as ‘the Slavonic nature is more plastic and more naturally savage than that of Western Europeans’.3


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document