scholarly journals PENGATURAN HUKUM SERTIFIKAT HAK ATAS MEREK SEBAGAI JAMINAN FIDUSIA DALAM PROSES PENGAJUAN KREDIT DI PERBANKAN BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 20 TAHUN 2016

Author(s):  
Made Bagus Satria Yudistira

United Nations Commission on Intellectual Trade Law (UNCITRAL) in a conference held on 39th round in 2006, this round brought to the result of intellectual properties, specifically on the Trademarks that has been the source of bank financing. Then the things that to be discussed regarding to the legal arrangements of the rights certificate on the trademark as fiduciary assurance in the process of application for bank credit and also the ideal form provisions of the trademark as an object that used as an assurance object. The purpose of this writing is to find the explication of the rule of law concerning about the rights provision to the trademark as a fiduciary assurance after the issuance of the constitutions number 20 of 2016 about trademark and geographical indications, because in that constitution there was nothing firm as it stated on the article that related to the rights of the trademark as fiduciary assurance or the norm is blurred and implicitly stated that the rights of the trademark can be used as an object of fiduciary assurance. Besides that there was also the non-law factor and the bank policy that complicates the process in banking. Nevertheless there is a legal basis that arranged by the constitutions number 42 of 1999 regarding the fiduciary assurance and the code of civil law concerning the elements of the trademark that can be used as fiduciary assurance in the process of credit application. United Nations Comission on Intellectual Trade Law (UNCITRAL) dalam pertemuan yang diselenggarakan pada putaran ke 39 yaitu pada tahun 2006, putaran in menghasilkan kekayaan intelektual, khususnya Merek telah menjadi sumber pembiayaan Perbankan. Maka yang perlu dibahas mengenai Pengaturan Hukum sertifikat Hak atas Merek sebagai jaminan Fidusia dalam proses pengajuan kredit di perbankan serta ketentuan wujud ideal dari merek sebagai benda yang dijadikan obyek jaminan. Tujuan dari Penulisan adalah mencari kejelasan aturan hukum mengenai ketentuan Hak atas merek sebagai jaminan fidusia setelah diterbitkannya Undang-undang no 20 tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis, karena di dalam Undang-undang tersebut tidak menyatakan dengan tegas Pasal yang berkaitan dengan hak Merek sebagai jaminan fidusia atau norma kabur yang tidak secara tegas menyatakan Hak atas Merek dapat dijadikan objek sebagai Jaminan fidusia. Di samping itu juga terdapat faktor non-hukum serta kebijakan Bank yang mempersulit prosesnya di perbankan. Walaupun demikian sesungguhnya terdapat dasar hukum yang diatur oleh Undang-undang no 42 tahun 1999 tentang jaminan Fidusia dan Kitab Undang-undang hukum Perdata mengenai unsur-unsur Merek bahwa dapat dijadikan sebagai jaminan fidusia dalam proses pengajuan kredit.

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-180
Author(s):  
Bronik Matwijkiw ◽  
Anja Matwijkiw

AbstractIn this article, the two authors examine the leap from business management to contemporary international law in the context of stakeholder theory. Because stakeholder theory was developed for business management, they provide a thorough account of the original framework. Furthermore, to illustrate the theory's application as a recently adopted parameter for the United Nations, they use former Secretary-General Kofi Atta Annan's 2004-report to the Security Council, "The Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies". Proceeding on the hypothesis that while all premises ultimately match traditional positions in general jurisprudence, it appears that stakeholder theory nevertheless forces the United Nations to take sides in an unprecedented manner, especially pertaining to rights-typology and the credentials-checking for this. Finally, some of the most important implications are distilled as part of an attempt to formulate a few recommendations for United Nations justice managers and administrators.


1999 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olufemi Taiwo

These are the best of times for the Rule of Law. In all parts of the world, states, governments, and individuals, have found in the rule of law, at various times, a rallying cry, a principle of social ordering that promises the dawn of a just society that its supporters in Euro-American democracies claim to be its crowning glory, or a set of practices that is a sine qua non of a good society. The pursuit of the ideal is nothing new: after all, even those states where it was observed more often in its breach always paid lip service to it. And the defunct socialist countries of Eastern Europe, while they existed, could not escape its lure even as they sought to give it a different nomenclature—socialist legality. The movement towards the rule of law has accelerated after the collapse of Soviet communism and its foster progeny in different parts of the world. Given the present momentum towards the rule of law and the widespread enthusiasm with which it is being embraced and pursued at the global level, some would consider it somewhat churlish for anyone to inject any note of doubt or caution. This is more so when such a note emanates from Marxist quarters. But that is precisely what I wish to do in this essay. Although I do not intend to rain on the rule of law’s entire parade, I surely propose to rain on a segment of it: the Marxist float. I propose to look at the issue within the context of the Marxist politico-philosophical tradition.


Author(s):  
L. C. Green

SummaryThe author considers the application of relevant human rights provisions to the Balkans both historically and in terms of contemporary issues. In particular, he discusses the legality of the measures taken under the auspices of NATO in respect of Kosovo and queries whether such measures are able to remedy such a breakdown of civil administration and respect for human rights. In the author's view, in such circumstances, administration of a country by the United Nations itself provides the only viable alternative.


2020 ◽  
pp. 174387212097533
Author(s):  
Johan van der Walt

This short article on Peter Fitzpatrick’s conception of “responsive law” analyzes the ambiguous temporality that Fitzpatrick discerned in modern law. On the one hand, law makes the claim of being fully present and therefore already and completely contained in itself. This aspect of law reflects the law’s claim to “immanence,” that is, its claim of always being able to rely strictly on its own operational terms without having to take recourse to any consideration not already contained within itself. It is this aspect of law that renders the ideal of the “rule of law” feasible. On the other hand, the law’s claim to doing justice to every unique and therefore every new case also demands that it takes leave of that which is already settled within it. This aspect of law can be called its “imminence.” The imminence of the law concerns the reality that law always finds itself on the threshold of that which has not yet been said and must still be said. The article shows how Fitzpatrick relied on Freud’s concept of the totem to explain the “wondrous” unity of its immanence and imminence.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document