scholarly journals Monitoring the impact of COVID-19 in Myanmar: Agricultural commodity traders - Late June 2020 survey round

Author(s):  
Joseph Goeb ◽  
A. Myint Zu ◽  
Nang Lun Kham Synt ◽  
Phoo Pye Zone ◽  
Duncan Boughton ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Goeb ◽  
Duncan Boughton ◽  
Mywish K. Maredia ◽  
A. Myint Zu ◽  
Nang Lun Kham Synt

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Goeb ◽  
Duncan Boughton ◽  
Mywish K. Maredia ◽  
A. Myint Zu ◽  
Nang Lun Kham Synt

2018 ◽  
Vol 78 (5) ◽  
pp. 571-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steffen Volkenand ◽  
Guenther Filler ◽  
Martin Odening

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate and compare the impact of order imbalance on returns, liquidity and price volatility in agricultural futures markets on an intraday basis. The authors examine whether order imbalance is more powerful to explain variations in asset prices compared to other indicators of trading activity, particularly trading volume.Design/methodology/approachUsing Chicago Mercantile Exchange best bid best offer data, the impact of order imbalance is analyzed via regression analyses. The analyses are carried out for corn, wheat, soy, live cattle and lean hogs in March 2008 and March 2016.FindingsResults confirm the positive relation between order imbalance and returns as well as between order imbalance and price volatility as suggested by market microstructure models. Order imbalance, however, does not generally outperform trading volume as an explanatory variable.Practical implicationsFor some contracts, returns can be predicted using lagged order imbalance. This offers the opportunity to derive profitable trading strategies.Originality/valueThis paper is one of the first attempts to explore the relationship between order imbalance and returns, liquidity and volatility for agricultural commodity futures on an intraday basis, accounting for the increased trading volume and for the high speed at which new information enters the market in an electronic trading environment.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (SI) ◽  
pp. 79-89
Author(s):  
Sanjay Mansabdar ◽  
Hussain C Yaganti

Agricultural commodity futures in India are settled by physical delivery and the seller can choose the location of delivery from a list described in the contract specifications. Cash markets at these locations represent the deliverable basket for the futures contract and are the underlying assets for the delivery options granted to the seller by virtue of contract design.  These cash markets are generally heterogenous. This paper studies the impact of heterogeneity of the underlying cash markets in different locations on the hedging effectiveness of the associated futures contract. The hedging effectiveness of cottonseed oilcake and soybean futures is regressed against several variables that represent heterogeneity of the underlying cash markets using ridge regression. We find that in general, the greater the heterogeneity, the poorer the hedging effectiveness of the contract. This paper is unique in that it provides a framework for guidance for contract designers at exchanges and regulators who will find this research useful in optimizing delivery specifications for agricultural futures contracts.  This is especially important given the declining volumes in Indian agricultural commodity futures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document