Acute severe asthma (status asthmaticus)

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 406-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neha T. Agnihotri ◽  
Carol Saltoun

Acute severe asthma, formerly known as status asthmaticus, is defined as severe asthma unresponsive to repeated courses of beta-agonist therapy. It is a medical emergency that requires immediate recognition and treatment. Albuterol in combination with ipratropium bromide in the emergency department (ED) has been shown to decrease the time spent in the ED and the hospitalization rates. The benefits of ipratropium are not sustained after admission to the hospital. Oral or parenteral corticosteroids should be administered to all patients with acute severe asthma as early as possible because clinical benefits may not occur for a minimum of 6 to 12 hours. Viral respiratory infections are a common trigger for acute asthma; other causes include medical nonadherence, allergen exposure (especially pets and mold [e.g., Alternaria species]) in individuals who are severely atopic, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory exposure in patients with aspirin allergy, irritant inhalation (e.g., smoke, paint), exercise, and insufficient use of inhaled or oral corticosteroids. The patient's history should focus on the acute assessment of asthma control and morbidity, including current use of oral or inhaled corticosteroids; the number of hospitalizations, ED visits, intensive care unit admissions, and intubations; the frequency of albuterol use; the presence of nighttime symptoms; activity intolerance; current medications; exposure to allergens; and other significant medical conditions. Severe airflow obstruction may be predicted by accessory muscle use, difficulty speaking, refusal to recline < 30°, a pulse of >120 beats/min, and decreased breath sounds. More objective measures of airway obstruction via peak flow or forced expiratory volume in 1 second and pulse oximetry before oxygen administration usually are helpful. Pulse oximetry values of >90% are reassuring, although CO2 retention and a low partial pressure of oxygen may be missed.

2009 ◽  
Vol 35 (7) ◽  
pp. 635-644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustavo Javier Rodrigo ◽  
Vicente Plaza ◽  
Jesús Bellido-Casado ◽  
Hugo Neffen ◽  
María Teresa Bazús ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE: Studies assessing the characteristics and management of patients hospitalized with asthma have been limited to a small number of facilities and have evaluated short time periods. The present study evaluated long-term changes among hospitalized asthma patients at a large number of facilities. METHODS: This was a retrospective, hospital-based observational case series, designated the Study of Severe Asthma in Latin America and Spain, which was conducted in Spain and in eight Latin-American countries. We reviewed the hospital records of 3,038 patients (age range, 15-69 years) hospitalized with acute severe asthma at one of nineteen tertiary-care hospitals in 1994, 1999 and 2004. RESULTS: Over time, the use of inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2 agonists increased significantly, whereas the use of theophylline as a controller medication decreased. The utilization of pulmonary function tests also increased. There was a significant reduction in the mean hospital stay (8.5 days, 7.4 days and 7.1 days in 1994, 1999 and 2004, respectively, p = 0.0001) and a significant increase in the mean of the lowest arterial pH at hospital admission. In contrast, there was a significant decrease in the proportion of cases in which PEF was determined in the emergency room (48.6% in 1994 vs. 43.5% in 2004, p = 0.0001). We found the quality of asthma management and care to be generally better in Spain than in Latin America. CONCLUSIONS: Although there have been certain improvements in the management of asthma between severe exacerbations and during hospitalization, asthma management remains suboptimal in Spain and, especially, in Latin America.


2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 47-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachna Shah ◽  
Carol A. Saltoun

1999 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sally E Wenzel

Leukotrienes (LTs), lipid mediators of inflammation, have proved to be important biochemicals involved in the symptoms and physiological changes of asthma. In the past year and a half, the development of three new drugs that modulate the LT pathway has been completed. The first subclass of these drugs, leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA) (zafirlukast and montelukast), blocks the interaction of the cysteinyl form of the LTs with the cell type bearing the receptor. The second subclass, the 5-lipoxygenase (5-LO) inhibitors (zileuton) inhibits the 5-LO enzyme, which prevents the formation of both cysteinyl LTs and LTB4. The LT modulators have shown efficacy in inhibiting the physiological changes occurring after allergen, acetylsalicylic acid and exercise challenge in asthmatics. In addition, they have shown efficacy in improving symptoms, beta-agonist use and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) in chronic, ‘day-to-day’ asthma in patients with mild disease. Comparison studies with low doses of inhaled corticosteroids suggest that LT modulators may have similar effects on symptom scores and beta-agonist use, but have lesser effects on FEV1. Finally, emerging data suggest that these drugs are beneficial in decreasing the dose of inhaled corticosteroids necessary to control more moderate to severe asthma. While long term studies will be helpful in determining the ‘disease modifying’ effects of these drugs, data suggest that these drugs are useful in the treatment of a broad range of asthmatic patients.


2006 ◽  
Vol 41 (12) ◽  
pp. 1213-1217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher L. Carroll ◽  
Anita Bhandari ◽  
Craig M. Schramm ◽  
Aaron R. Zucker

1992 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. William Kelly ◽  
Shirley Murphy

OBJECTIVE: To critically review the use of beta-adrenergic agonists in acute, severe asthma with particular focus on aerosol administration. DATA SOURCES: English language articles published since 1971 on the use of beta-agonists for acute asthma. Studies were identified from bibliographies of book chapters, review articles, and other research articles. STUDY SELECTION: All studies (21 total) comparing systemic with inhaled beta-agonists were reviewed, regardless of their design or outcome. Selected studies highlighting specific aspects of beta-agonist use in acute asthma such as beta-agonists versus other bronchodilators, aerosol delivery, and intravenous beta-agonists were also reviewed. DATA EXTRACTION: Performed subjectively by the authors with specific aspects of quality discussed within the body of the article. DATA SYNTHESIS: The beta-agonists provide superior bronchodilation in acute severe asthma compared with either the methylxanthines and/or anticholinergics. The majority of studies found aerosolized beta-agonists to be either as effective as or more effective than parenteral beta-agonists and to produce fewer adverse cardiovascular effects. Studies showing preference for parenteral therapy have either been of poor design or used low doses of an aerosolized beta-agonist. Based on studies of aerosol delivery, there is no advantage of jet nebulization over metered-dose inhalers; however, other aspects, including ease of administration, favor nebulization as the delivery method of choice. The articles recommending intravenous beta-agonists consist of a series of uncontrolled cases. CONCLUSIONS: Aerosolized selective beta2-agonists are the bronchodilator treatments of choice for acute, severe asthma. Attention to the details of dosing and delivery are required for optimal results. The final dose and dosing interval are determined by the patient's response. Intravenous beta-agonists are hazardous and cannot be recommended.


2001 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. William Kelly

Acute severe asthma exacerbations resulting in emergency department visits and hospitalization usually constitute a failure of long-term control therapy. However, even patients with relatively mild asthma can have severe life-threatening episodes. In both children and adults, viral respiratory infections are the major triggering event, although outbreaks of severe asthma have been associated with high concentrations of aeroallergens. Patients should be provided with written action plans on what to do for acute deterioration, and more severe patients may keep prednisone at home to begin after consultation with their physician. The primary therapy of acute asthma exacerbations remains frequent administration of aerosol β2-agonists and systemic corticosteroids for those patients not fully responding to the β2-agonists. Mild exacerbations may be treated with an increased dosage of inhaled corticosteroids. Patients at risk for acute exacerbations may benefit from peak flow measurement, particularly those who have difficulty perceiving airway obstruction. It is recommended that patients remain on full dose of prednisone until they achieve 70-80 percent of predicted normal or personal best peak flow. In the emergency department, the use of β2-agonists by metered-dose inhaler and holding chamber is as effective as nebulizer if given in a sufficient dose 6-10 puffs equivalent to 5 mg via nebulizer. In those patients not responding completely, the addition of ipratropium bromide has shown to produce additive bronchodilation and reduce hospitalizations. Other therapies such as magnesium sulfate, intravenous β2-agonists, heliox and ketamine have been used, but data demonstrating efficacy are insufficient to warrant recommending their general use.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 403-405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A. Greenberger

Potentially (near) fatal asthma (PFA) defines a subset of patients with asthma who are at increased risk for death from their disease. The diagnosis of PFA should motivate treating physicians, health professionals, and patients to be more aggressive in the monitoring, treatment, and control of this high-risk type of asthma. A diagnosis of PFA is made when any one of the following are present: (1) a history of endotracheal intubation from asthma, (2) acute respiratory acidosis (pH < 7.35) or respiratory failure from acute severe asthma, (3) two or more episodes of acute pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum from asthma, (4) two or more episodes of acute severe asthma, despite the use of long-term oral corticosteroids and other antiasthma medications. There are two predominant phenotypes of near-fatal exacerbations: “subacute” exacerbation and “hyperacute” exacerbation. The best way to “treat” acute severe asthma is 3‐7 days before it occurs (i.e., at the onset of symptoms or change in respiratory function) and to optimize control of asthma by decreasing the number of symptomatic days and the days and/or nights that require rescue therapy and increasing baseline respiratory status in “poor perceivers.” PFA is treated with a multifaceted approach; physicians and health-care professionals should appreciate limitations of pharmacotherapy, including combination inhaled corticosteroid‐long-acting β-agonist products as well as addressing nonadherence, psychiatric, and socioeconomic issues that complicate care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document